Paper · 2006 · Journal of Productivity and Development

EFFECT OF INTERCROPPING AND NEIGHBOR SYSTEMS OF COTTON PLANTS AND OTHER SUMMER CROPS ON THE OCCURRANCE OF SOME COTTON PESTS AND ASSOCIATED NATURAL ENEMIES

Mohamed Ibraheem; Atef Abd Allah; Hatem Al-Shannaf

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of intercropping and neighbor cotton plants with other summer plants on the occurrence levels of some cotton pests in Graia village at Zagazig, Sharkia Governorate during 2003 and 2004 seasons. The results show that Intercropping cotton with tomato or onion increased Aphis gossypii ( Glover) average numbers significantly on cotton plants. While with cucumber and pepper the average numbers were decreased in both 2003 and 2004 seasons. The average numbers of Tetranychus spp. increased in intercropping system of cotton with tomato or cucumber, while the contrast results was found with onion or pepper intercropping system in comparing with the solid cotton plants during 2003 and 2004 seasons. The all intercropping systems increased the population density of Thrips tabaci (Lind.) on cotton plants in comparable with solid plants in both of seasons. The influences of intercropping systems on Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) and Empoasca sp. were differed from season to another and from system to another. With respect to the occurrence of associated natural enemies under intercropping systems, the highest population density of predators, Scymnus spp. and Orius spp. were recorded on cotton plants intercropped with tomato in both seasons. While, the highest number of predators ( Syrphus sp.,) Paederus alfierii, true spider mites, predator mite (Phytoseiulus sp.) and parasitoids, Encarsia sp. and Ertmocerus sp. were recorded on solid cotton plants compared to the intercropping systems in the two study seasons. The highest numbers of Chrysoperla carnea were detected on cotton plants intercropped with cucumber, whereas, the highest average number of Coccinella spp. recorded on cotton plants intercropped with onion in the first season and cotton plants intercropped with tomato in the second one. As neighbor effect, the numbers of Empoasca sp. and T.tabaci was increased on cotton plants, while the numbers of A. gossypii, B. tabaci and Tetranychus spp. were decreased in both of seasons 2003 and 2004. The neighbor of cotton plants by tomato, cucumber, onion or pepper was increased the numbers of predators (Chrysoperla carnea, Orius spp., Paederus alfierii) and parasitoid, Encarsia sp. on cotton plants; while the numbers of Coccinella spp. Scymnus spp., Syrphus spp., true spider mites and Ertmocerns sp. were decreased in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping cotton with tomato or onion increased Aphis gossypii ( Glover) average numbers significantly on cotton plants.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
tomato or onione0
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
numberse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping cotton with tomato or onion increased Aphis gossypii ( Glover) average numbers significantly on cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–388 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber and pepper intercropping reduced Aphis gossypii numbers.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
cucumber and peppere0
Interactor
Aphis gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
Aphis gossypii ( Glover) average numberse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intercropping cotton with tomato or onion increased Aphis gossypii ( Glover) average numbers significantly on cotton plants. While with cucumber and pepper the average numbers were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato or cucumber intercropping increased Tetranychus spp. numbers.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
tomato or cucumbere0
Interactor
Tetranychus spp.Tetranychuse0pest
Outcome
average numbers of Tetranychus spp.e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus
Tetranychus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)J. Holopainen · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average numbers of Tetranychus spp. increased in intercropping system of cotton with tomato or cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion or pepper intercropping decreased Tetranychus spp. numbers versus solid cotton.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
onion or pepper intercropping systeme0
Interactor
Tetranychus spp.Tetranychuse0pest
Outcome
average numbers of Tetranychus spp.e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Comparator
solid cotton plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus
Tetranychus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)J. Holopainen · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average numbers of Tetranychus spp. increased in intercropping system of cotton with tomato or cucumber, while the contrast results was found with onion or pepper intercropping system in comparing with the solid cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All intercropping systems raised Thrips tabaci population density relative to solid cotton.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
all intercropping systemse0
Interactor
Thrips tabaciThrips tabacie0pest
Outcome
population density of Thrips tabaci (Lind.)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
solid plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The all intercropping systems increased the population density of Thrips tabaci (Lind.) on cotton plants in comparable with solid plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bemisia tabaci and Empoasca responses to intercropping varied by season and system.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
intercropping systemse0
Interactor
Bemisia tabaci (Genn.)Bemisia tabacie0pest
Second interactor
Empoasca sp.Empoascae0pest
Outcome
Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) and Empoasca sp.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The influences of intercropping systems on Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) and Empoasca sp. were differed from season to another and from system to another”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato intercropping produced the highest densities of Scymnus spp. and Orius spp. predators.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
intercropped with tomatoe0
Interactor
Scymnus spp.Scymnuse0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Orius spp.Oriuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population density of predatorse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scymnus
Scymnus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJ. Poorani · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orius
Orius · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Michael J. Raupach, Lars Hendrich, Stefan M. Kuchler, Fabian Deister, Jérome Moriniére, Martin M. Gossner · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest population density of predators, Scymnus spp. and Orius spp. were recorded on cotton plants intercropped with tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solid cotton had the highest densities of Syrphus, Paederus, spiders, Phytoseiulus and two parasitoids.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
solid cotton plantse0
Interactor
Syrphus sp.Syrphuse0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Paederus alfieriie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
highest number of predatorse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
true spider mites, predator mite (Phytoseiulus sp.) and parasitoids, Encarsia sp. and Ertmocerus sp.e0
Comparator
intercropping systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Syrphus
Syrphus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest number of predators ( Syrphus sp.,) Paederus alfierii, true spider mites, predator mite (Phytoseiulus sp.) and parasitoids, Encarsia sp. and Ertmocerus sp. were recorded on solid cotton plants compared to the intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber intercropping had the highest Chrysoperla carnea numbers.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
intercropped with cucumbere0
Interactor
Chrysoperla carneaChrysoperla carneae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
numbers of Chrysoperla carneae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest numbers of Chrysoperla carnea were detected on cotton plants intercropped with cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion intercropping had the highest Coccinella numbers in the first season.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
intercropped with onione0
Interactor
Coccinella spp.Coccinellae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
average number of Coccinella spp.e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
first seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coccinella
Coccinella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)JJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest average number of Coccinella spp. recorded on cotton plants intercropped with onion in the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato intercropping had the highest Coccinella numbers in the second season.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
intercropped with tomatoe0
Interactor
Coccinella spp.Coccinellae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
average number of Coccinella spp.e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
second onee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coccinella
Coccinella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)JJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest average number of Coccinella spp. recorded on cotton plants intercropped with onion in the first season and cotton plants intercropped with tomato in the second one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neighbor crops increased Empoasca and Thrips tabaci on cotton.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
neighbor effecte0
Interactor
Empoasca sp.Empoascae0pest
Second interactor
T.tabaciThrips tabacie0pest
Outcome
numbers of Empoasca sp. and T.tabacie0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Empoasca
Empoasca · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Hectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“As neighbor effect, the numbers of Empoasca sp. and T.tabaci was increased on cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–1942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neighbor crops decreased Aphis gossypii, Bemisia tabaci and Tetranychus numbers.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor
A. gossypiiAphis gossypiie0pest
Second interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
numbers of A. gossypii, B. tabaci and Tetranychus spp.e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
Tetranychus spp.e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · Second interactorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the numbers of A. gossypii, B. tabaci and Tetranychus spp. were decreased in both of seasons 2003 and 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1950–2056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neighbor crops increased Chrysoperla, Orius, Paederus and Encarsia on cotton.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
neighbor of cotton plants by tomato, cucumber, onion or peppere0
Interactor
Chrysoperla carneaChrysoperla carneae0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Orius spp.Oriuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
numbers of predatorse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Paederus alfieriie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orius
Orius · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Michael J. Raupach, Lars Hendrich, Stefan M. Kuchler, Fabian Deister, Jérome Moriniére, Martin M. Gossner · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“The neighbor of cotton plants by tomato, cucumber, onion or pepper was increased the numbers of predators (Chrysoperla carnea, Orius spp., Paederus alfierii) and parasitoid, Encarsia sp. on cotton plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neighbor crops decreased Coccinella, Scymnus, Syrphus, spiders and Ertmocerns.

Taxon
COTTON PLANTSGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor
Coccinella spp.Coccinellae0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Scymnus spp.Scymnuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
numbers of Coccinella spp. Scymnus spp., Syrphus spp., true spider mites and Ertmocerns sp.e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
Syrphus spp., true spider mites and Ertmocerns sp.e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Coccinella
Coccinella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)JJ Harrison ( https://www.jjharrison.com.au/ ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Scymnus
Scymnus · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJ. Poorani · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the numbers of Coccinella spp. Scymnus spp., Syrphus spp., true spider mites and Ertmocerns sp. were decreased in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2269–2395 · show in text ↑

Allium cepa · Aphis gossypii · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · Chrysoperla carnea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.