Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Rootstocks and Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production

T. El-Gazzar; K. Dawa; E. Ibrahim; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study was carried out at a private nursery in Mansoura city and a private farm at Zayyan region, Belqas district, Dakahlia Governorate during the two summer seasons of 2014 and 2015 to study the effects of different rootstocks and grafting methods on growth, yield and fruit quality of watermelon cv. Aswan F1. The experiment included thirteen treatments resulted from the combinations of four rootstocks [Jumbo F1 and Nun 6001 F1 hybrids (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata), Bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Standl.) and Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata L.)] and three grafting methods [ Hole insertion (HIG), Splice (SG) and Tongue approach (TAG)] as well as non-grafted plants (control). The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete blocks design with three replicates. The results indicated that grafting, especially onto Jumbo rootstock using Tongue approach grafting method, recorded the greatest values of vegetative growth parameters (lateral stems number, leaves number and foliage dry matter %), female flowers number and early and total fruit yield compared to non-grafted plants in both seasons. Grafting combinations didn’t show any significance differences with regard to sex ratio. Furthermore, there was a balance between number of fruits per plant and average fruit weight which eventually led to early and total yield increasing compared to non-grafted plants in both seasons. The highest values of total soluble solids (TSS), reducing sugars, vitamin C and Lycopene were estimated in the fruits of grafted plants onto Jumbo rootstock compared to other rootstocks in both seasons. On the other hand, the grafting methods had insignificant effects on fruit quality during both seasons. Therefore, the using of Jumbo as rootstock and Tongue approach as grafting method may be a successful strategy to increase vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality of watermelon cv. Aswan F1 under similar conditions of this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting onto Jumbo rootstock by tongue approach gave the greatest vegetative growth parameters compared to non-grafted plants.

Taxon
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)Citrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafting, especially onto Jumbo rootstock using Tongue approach grafting methode1
Outcome
vegetative growth parameterse1
Direction
greatest valuese1
Qualifier
lateral stems number, leaves number and foliage dry matter %e1
Comparator
non-grafted plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafting, especially onto Jumbo rootstock using Tongue approach grafting method, recorded the greatest values of vegetative growth parameters (lateral stems number, leaves number and foliage dry matter %), female flowers number and early and total fruit yield compared to non-grafted plants in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting onto Jumbo rootstock by tongue approach gave the greatest number of female flowers compared to non-grafted plants.

Taxon
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)Citrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafting, especially onto Jumbo rootstock using Tongue approach grafting methode1
Outcome
female flowers numbere1
Direction
greatest valuese1
Comparator
non-grafted plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafting, especially onto Jumbo rootstock using Tongue approach grafting method, recorded the greatest values of vegetative growth parameters (lateral stems number, leaves number and foliage dry matter %), female flowers number and early and total fruit yield compared to non-grafted plants in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting onto Jumbo rootstock by tongue approach gave the greatest early and total fruit yield compared to non-grafted plants in both seasons.

Taxon
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)Citrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafting, especially onto Jumbo rootstock using Tongue approach grafting methode1
Outcome
early and total fruit yielde1
Direction
greatest valuese1
Comparator
non-grafted plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“grafting, especially onto Jumbo rootstock using Tongue approach grafting method, recorded the greatest values of vegetative growth parameters (lateral stems number, leaves number and foliage dry matter %), female flowers number and early and total fruit yield compared to non-grafted plants in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting combinations showed no significant difference in sex ratio.

Taxon
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)Citrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Grafting combinationse2
Outcome
sex ratioe2
Direction
didn’t show any significance differencese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grafting combinations didn’t show any significance differences with regard to sex ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits of plants grafted onto Jumbo rootstock had the highest total soluble solids, reducing sugars and vitamin C compared to other rootstocks.

Taxon
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)Citrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
fruitse3
Treatment
grafted plants onto Jumbo rootstocke3
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS), reducing sugars, vitamin Ce3
Direction
highest valuese3
Comparator
other rootstockse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest values of total soluble solids (TSS), reducing sugars, vitamin C and Lycopene were estimated in the fruits of grafted plants onto Jumbo rootstock compared to other rootstocks in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits of plants grafted onto Jumbo rootstock had the highest lycopene compared to other rootstocks.

Taxon
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)Citrullus lanatust0
Organ / stage
fruitse3
Treatment
grafted plants onto Jumbo rootstocke3
Outcome
Lycopenee3
Direction
highest valuese3
Comparator
other rootstockse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest values of total soluble solids (TSS), reducing sugars, vitamin C and Lycopene were estimated in the fruits of grafted plants onto Jumbo rootstock compared to other rootstocks in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting methods had insignificant effects on fruit quality in both seasons.

Taxon
Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus)Citrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafting methodse4
Outcome
fruit qualitye4
Direction
insignificant effectse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Methods on Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“the grafting methods had insignificant effects on fruit quality during both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1722 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Using Jumbo as rootstock and the tongue approach as grafting method may be a successful strategy to increase watermelon vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality under similar conditions.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse5
Treatment
Jumbo as rootstock and Tongue approach as grafting methode5
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield and fruit qualitye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“the using of Jumbo as rootstock and Tongue approach as grafting method may be a successful strategy to increase vegetative growth, yield and fruit quality of watermelon cv. Aswan F1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1916 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

66 papers: 59 positive, 7 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Grafting increased watermelon fruit size.

    Fruit yield and quality of watermelon in relation to grafting · 2007 · compared with non-grafted control

    Same directionCited by this paper

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

69 papers: 62 positive, 7 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

grafting · phenology · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

grafting · quality: grain · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.