Paper · 2015 · Journal of Dryland Agriculture

Effect of Water Stress and Variety on Phenology of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Sokoto, Sudan Savannah, Nigeria

M.B. Sokoto; I. U. Abubakar; A. Singh

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of water stress on phenology and identify drought resistance mechanism in bread wheat and also to find out the most crucial stage of growth with respect to water stress in wheat variety. The experimental materials consisted of and two bread wheat varieties (Star 11 TR 77173/SLM and Kauz/Weaver). Water stress was imposed at three critical growth stages by withholding water at (tillering, flowering, grain filling stages, there was also the control with no water stress treatments. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replications. Water stress was allocated to the main plot, while variety was assigned to the sub plot. The research was conducted during the 2009/10 and 2010/11 dry seasons at the Usmanu Danfodiyo University, teaching and research Fadama farm, Sokoto in the Sudan Savanna ecological zone of Nigeria (latitude 130011N; longitude 50151E and at an altitude of about 350 m above sea level). Water stress at tillering resulted in significant (P<0.05) reduction in days to 50% booting, heading and anthesis, Water stress at grain filling resulted to significant reduction in grain filling duration and such limitation caused the canopy to senesce prematurely, The variety Star II TR 77173/ SLM had shorter days to booting, heading and anthesis than Kauz/Weaver. Star II TR 77173/ SLM was better than Kauz/Weaver in its ability to complete its growth period and mature before the drought stress appeared to exert its limiting effect. The phonological stages of booting, heading, flowering and maturity were all influenced by water stress/drought. Star II TR 77173/ SLM is recommended to this area and other areas with similar climate due to its superiority over Kauz/Weaver through its ability to complete its growth period and mature before the drought stress appears to exert its limiting effect. Key words: Water stress; variety; bread wheat; phenology; Sudan savannah

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at tillering significantly shortened time to 50% booting, heading and anthesis.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Water stress at tilleringe0
Outcome
days to 50% booting, heading and anthesise0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress at tillering resulted in significant (P<0.05) reduction in days to 50% booting, heading and anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at grain filling significantly shortened grain filling duration.

Treatment
Water stress at grain fillinge0
Outcome
grain filling duratione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress at grain filling resulted to significant reduction in grain filling duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at grain filling caused premature canopy senescence.

Treatment
such limitatione0
Outcome
canopy to senescee0
Direction
prematurelye0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“such limitation caused the canopy to senesce prematurely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Star II TR 77173/ SLM reached booting, heading and anthesis sooner than Kauz/Weaver.

Material
Star II TR 77173/ SLMe0
Outcome
days to booting, heading and anthesise0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
Kauz/Weavere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The variety Star II TR 77173/ SLM had shorter days to booting, heading and anthesis than Kauz/Weaver.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Star II TR 77173/ SLM was better able than Kauz/Weaver to mature before drought became limiting.

Material
Star II TR 77173/ SLMe0
Outcome
ability to complete its growth period and mature before the drought stress appeared to exert its limiting effecte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Kauz/Weavere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Star II TR 77173/ SLM was better than Kauz/Weaver in its ability to complete its growth period and mature before the drought stress appeared to exert its limiting effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1527 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress influenced booting, heading, flowering and maturity.

Treatment
water stress/droughte0
Outcome
phonological stages of booting, heading, flowering and maturitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The phonological stages of booting, heading, flowering and maturity were all influenced by water stress/drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1640 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Star II TR 77173/ SLM for this and climatically similar areas.

Material
Star II TR 77173/ SLMe0
Outcome
recommended to this area and other areas with similar climatee0
Comparator
Kauz/Weavere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Star II TR 77173/ SLM is recommended to this area and other areas with similar climate due to its superiority over Kauz/Weaver”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1767 · show in text ↑

tillage · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · phenology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

17 papers: 0 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.