Paper · 2019 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus to enhance nitrogen use efficiency and close the wheat yield gap on varying soils in semi‐arid conditions

Therese M. McBeath; Vadakattu V. S. R. Gupta; Rick S. Llewellyn; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract A primary driver of the wheat yield gap in Australia and globally is the supply of nitrogen (N) and options to increase N use efficiency (NUE) are fundamental to closure of the yield gap. Co‐application of N with phosphorus (P) is suggested as an avenue to increase fertiliser NUE, and inputs of N and P fertiliser are key variable costs in low rainfall cereal crops. Within field variability in the response to nutrients due to soil and season offers a further opportunity to refine inputs for increased efficiency. The response of wheat to N fertiliser input (0, 10, 20, 40 and 80 kg N ha ‐1 ) under four levels of P fertiliser (0, 5, 10 and 20 kg P ha −1 ) was measured on three key low rainfall cropping soils (dune, mid‐slope and swale) across a dune‐swale system in a low rainfall semi‐arid environment in South Australia, for three successive cropping seasons. Wheat on sandy soils produced significant and linear yield and protein responses across all three seasons, while wheat on a clay loam only produced a yield response in a high rainfall season. Responses to P fertiliser were measured on the sandy soils but more variable in nature and a consistent effect of increased P nutrition leading to increased NUE was not measured.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat on sandy soils showed significant linear yield responses to nitrogen in all three seasons.

Treatment
N fertilisere1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
responsese0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat on sandy soils produced significant and linear yield and protein responses across all three seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“N fertiliser input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat on sandy soils showed significant linear protein responses to nitrogen in all three seasons.

Treatment
N fertilisere1
Outcome
proteine0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat on sandy soils produced significant and linear yield and protein responses across all three seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“N fertiliser input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat on clay loam showed a yield response only in a high rainfall season.

Treatment
N fertilisere1
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
high rainfall seasone0
Setting
clay loame0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat on a clay loam only produced a yield response in a high rainfall season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1067 · show in text ↑
e1

“N fertiliser input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat on sandy soils responded to phosphorus fertiliser, with variable responses.

Treatment
P fertilisere0
Outcome
Responsese0
Setting
sandy soilse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Responses to P fertiliser were measured on the sandy soils but more variable in nature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased phosphorus nutrition did not show a consistent increase in wheat nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
increased P nutritione0
Outcome
NUEe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a consistent effect of increased P nutrition leading to increased NUE was not measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat yield gap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.