Paper · 2015 · Journal of Productivity and Development

EFFECT OF APPLICATION METHODS AND CONCENTATION OF CHITOSAN ON GROWTH, YIELD, TUBER ROOTS QUALITY AND STORABILITY OF SWEET POTATO PLANTS GROWN UNDER SANDY SOIL CONDITIONS

Elsayied Abou El-Khair

19
claims
37
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This work was carried out during the two successive summer seasons of 2013 and 2014 at a Private Vegetable Farm in El-Khattara distract, Sharkia, Governorate, to investigate the effect of different application methods and concentrations of chitosan ( 0, 0.025, 0.075 and 0.125 %) on growth , yield , tuber roots quality and storability of sweet potato cv. Buregard grown under sandy soil conditions using drip irrigation system. Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosan was the best method for increasing dry weight of shoots, N,P and K uptake by shoots, marketable yield and total yield and also, for decreasing weight loss (%) and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period. Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period. Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution gave the highest values of vine length , dry weight of shoots/ plant, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll ( a+b) concentration in leaf tissues, average weight of tuber root, total yield , whereas the same treatment gave the lowest values of weight loss percentage and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period. On the other hand, the base of stem cuttings in 0.125 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.125 % chitosan gave the highest values of N,P and K uptake, marketable yield, starch and total sugar contents in tuber roots. Conclusively, from the foregoing results of this study, it could be concluded that, under the same conditions, dipping the base of the stem cutting in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution three times at 15 days intervals beginning 25 days after transplanting gave the best interaction treatment for increasing plant growth, yield and its components, tuber roots quality and storability of sweet potato plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cutting dip and foliar chitosan was best for increasing shoot dry weight.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosane0
Outcome
dry weight of shootse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosan was the best method for increasing dry weight of shoots, N,P and K uptake by shoots, marketable yield and total yield and also, for decreasing weight loss (%) and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cutting dip and foliar chitosan was best for increasing shoot N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosane0
Outcome
N,P and K uptake by shootse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosan was the best method for increasing dry weight of shoots, N,P and K uptake by shoots, marketable yield and total yield and also, for decreasing weight loss (%) and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cutting dip and foliar chitosan was best for increasing marketable and total yield.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosane0
Outcome
marketable yield and total yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosan was the best method for increasing dry weight of shoots, N,P and K uptake by shoots, marketable yield and total yield and also, for decreasing weight loss (%) and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined cutting dip and foliar chitosan was best for reducing stored tuber weight loss and decay.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosane0
Outcome
weight loss (%) and decay (%) in tuber rootse0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in chitosan solution before planting + foliar spraying of the plants with chitosan was the best method for increasing dry weight of shoots, N,P and K uptake by shoots, marketable yield and total yield and also, for decreasing weight loss (%) and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.075% increased growth and average tuber weight.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Chitosan solution 0.075 %e0
Outcome
growth, average tuber weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.075% increased total yield.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Chitosan solution 0.075 %e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.075% increased tuber starch and sugar.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Chitosan solution 0.075 %e0
Outcome
starch and total sugar in tuber rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.125% increased leaf chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
chitosan 0.125 %e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissuese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.125% increased shoot N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
chitosan 0.125 %e0
Outcome
N,P and K uptake by shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.125% increased marketable yield.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
chitosan 0.125 %e0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan at 0.125% produced minimum stored tuber weight loss and decay.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
chitosan 0.125 %e0
Outcome
weight loss and decay (%) in tuber rootse0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan solution 0.075 % increased growth, average tuber weight , total yield, starch and total sugar in tuber roots, whereas chitosan 0.125 % increased chlorophyll a, total (a+b) in leaf tissues, N,P and K uptake by shoots and marketable yield and also recorded minimum values of weight loss and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1106 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.075% chitosan dip and spray produced highest vine length and shoot dry weight.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solutione0
Outcome
vine length , dry weight of shoots/ plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution gave the highest values of vine length , dry weight of shoots/ plant, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll ( a+b) concentration in leaf tissues, average weight of tuber root, total yield , whereas the same treatment gave the lowest values of weight loss percentage and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.075% chitosan dip and spray produced highest leaf chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solutione0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll ( a+b) concentration in leaf tissuese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution gave the highest values of vine length , dry weight of shoots/ plant, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll ( a+b) concentration in leaf tissues, average weight of tuber root, total yield , whereas the same treatment gave the lowest values of weight loss percentage and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.075% chitosan dip and spray produced highest average tuber weight and total yield.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solutione0
Outcome
average weight of tuber root, total yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution gave the highest values of vine length , dry weight of shoots/ plant, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll ( a+b) concentration in leaf tissues, average weight of tuber root, total yield , whereas the same treatment gave the lowest values of weight loss percentage and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.075% chitosan dip and spray produced lowest stored tuber weight loss and decay.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solutione0
Outcome
weight loss percentage and decay (%) in tuber rootse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping the base of the stem cuttings in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution gave the highest values of vine length , dry weight of shoots/ plant, chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll ( a+b) concentration in leaf tissues, average weight of tuber root, total yield , whereas the same treatment gave the lowest values of weight loss percentage and decay (%) in tuber roots during storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.125% chitosan dip and spray produced highest shoot N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
the base of stem cuttings in 0.125 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.125 % chitosane0
Outcome
N,P and K uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, the base of stem cuttings in 0.125 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.125 % chitosan gave the highest values of N,P and K uptake, marketable yield, starch and total sugar contents in tuber roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1795 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.125% chitosan dip and spray produced highest marketable yield.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
the base of stem cuttings in 0.125 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.125 % chitosane0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, the base of stem cuttings in 0.125 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.125 % chitosan gave the highest values of N,P and K uptake, marketable yield, starch and total sugar contents in tuber roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1795 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 0.125% chitosan dip and spray produced highest tuber starch and sugar contents.

Taxon
SWEET POTATO PLANTSIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
the base of stem cuttings in 0.125 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.125 % chitosane0
Outcome
starch and total sugar contents in tuber rootse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the other hand, the base of stem cuttings in 0.125 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.125 % chitosan gave the highest values of N,P and K uptake, marketable yield, starch and total sugar contents in tuber roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1795 · show in text ↑
t0

“SWEET POTATO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a 0.075% chitosan dip plus three sprays at 15-day intervals beginning 25 days after transplanting for sweet potato growth, yield, quality and storability.

Taxon
sweet potato plantsIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
dipping the base of the stem cutting in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution three times at 15 days intervals beginning 25 days after transplantinge0
Outcome
plant growth, yield and its components, tuber roots quality and storabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conclusively, from the foregoing results of this study, it could be concluded that, under the same conditions, dipping the base of the stem cutting in 0.075 % chitosan solution before planting + spraying plants with 0.075 % chitosan solution three times at 15 days intervals beginning 25 days after transplanting gave the best interaction treatment for increasing plant growth, yield and its components, tuber roots quality and storability of sweet potato plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1796–2259 · show in text ↑

chitosan · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · quality: postharvest · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · physiology: pigments · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · disease · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.