Paper · 2019 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Effect of Some Fertilization Treatments on Growth, Yield, Fruit Quality and Nutritional Status of Banana Grande Naine Cultivar

Hamed albadawy

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This work was carried out at the sandy soil of El-Khatatba region, Minofia Governorate, Egypt, through the two successive seasons of 2016 and 2017 to study the effect of organic fertilization combined with chemical fertilizer in presence of bio fertilizer on growth, yield, quality and nutritional status of banana Grande Naine cultivar. Mother plants were planted at 3×2 m apart in March 2015 and two suckers were selected per each hole and the others were removed. The obtained results showed that, the highest values of pseudostem height, pseudostem circumference, leaf area and assimilation area per plants were scored by T1 recommended dose of chemical fertilization (RD), followed in descending order by T4 treatment (75% RD+21kg compost+5ml bio./plant) with non-significant differences between them in the two seasons. The highest values of bunch length, fruits yield per fed., the thickest bunch, the heaviest bunch, the highest number of fingers/hand and the heaviest hand were scored by T1 treatment, followed in descending order by T4 treatment in the two seasons. The highest values of finger length, finger diameter and finger weight as well as the richest fruit pulp total sugars % and T.S.S. % were recorded by T4, followed by T7 (75% RD+45g humic+ 5ml bio./plant) in the two seasons. The heaviest pulp weight was obtained by those received T4 treatment, followed in descending order by T7 treatments, whereas the highest pulp/peel ratio was registered by T7 and T4 treatments in the two seasons. Banana plants received the full dose of chemical fertilization (100% RD) is being the most promising one for inducing the greatest leaf total carbohydrates, N, P and K percentage, followed in descending order by T4 and T7 treatments without significant difference between them in the two seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 gave the highest pseudostem height, pseudostem circumference; T4 followed without a significant difference.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T1 recommended dose of chemical fertilization (RD)e0
Outcome
pseudostem height, pseudostem circumferencee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T4 treatment (75% RD+21kg compost+5ml bio./plant)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest values of pseudostem height, pseudostem circumference, leaf area and assimilation area per plants were scored by T1 recommended dose of chemical fertilization (RD), followed in descending order by T4 treatment (75% RD+21kg compost+5ml bio./plant) with non-significant differences between them in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 gave the highest leaf area and assimilation area per plants; T4 followed without a significant difference.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T1 recommended dose of chemical fertilization (RD)e0
Outcome
leaf area and assimilation area per plantse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T4 treatment (75% RD+21kg compost+5ml bio./plant)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest values of pseudostem height, pseudostem circumference, leaf area and assimilation area per plants were scored by T1 recommended dose of chemical fertilization (RD), followed in descending order by T4 treatment (75% RD+21kg compost+5ml bio./plant) with non-significant differences between them in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 ranked highest for bunch length, fruits yield per fed.; T4 ranked second.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T1 treatmente0
Outcome
bunch length, fruits yield per fed.e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T4 treatmente0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest values of bunch length, fruits yield per fed., the thickest bunch, the heaviest bunch, the highest number of fingers/hand and the heaviest hand were scored by T1 treatment, followed in descending order by T4 treatment in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 ranked highest for the thickest bunch, the heaviest bunch; T4 ranked second.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T1 treatmente0
Outcome
the thickest bunch, the heaviest bunche0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T4 treatmente0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest values of bunch length, fruits yield per fed., the thickest bunch, the heaviest bunch, the highest number of fingers/hand and the heaviest hand were scored by T1 treatment, followed in descending order by T4 treatment in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 ranked highest for the highest number of fingers/hand and the heaviest hand; T4 ranked second.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T1 treatmente0
Outcome
the highest number of fingers/hand and the heaviest hande0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T4 treatmente0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest values of bunch length, fruits yield per fed., the thickest bunch, the heaviest bunch, the highest number of fingers/hand and the heaviest hand were scored by T1 treatment, followed in descending order by T4 treatment in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 ranked highest for finger length, finger diameter and finger weight; T7 followed.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
finger length, finger diameter and finger weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T7 (75% RD+45g humic+ 5ml bio./plant)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest values of finger length, finger diameter and finger weight as well as the richest fruit pulp total sugars % and T.S.S. % were recorded by T4, followed by T7 (75% RD+45g humic+ 5ml bio./plant) in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 ranked highest for fruit pulp total sugars % and T.S.S. %; T7 followed.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
fruit pulp total sugars % and T.S.S. %e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T7 (75% RD+45g humic+ 5ml bio./plant)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest values of finger length, finger diameter and finger weight as well as the richest fruit pulp total sugars % and T.S.S. % were recorded by T4, followed by T7 (75% RD+45g humic+ 5ml bio./plant) in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the heaviest pulp weight, followed by T7.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T4 treatmente0
Outcome
pulp weighte0
Direction
heavieste0
Comparator
T7 treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The heaviest pulp weight was obtained by those received T4 treatment, followed in descending order by T7 treatments, whereas the highest pulp/peel ratio was registered by T7 and T4 treatments in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1511 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 and T4 gave the highest pulp-to-peel ratio.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
T7 and T4 treatmentse0
Outcome
pulp/peel ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The heaviest pulp weight was obtained by those received T4 treatment, followed in descending order by T7 treatments, whereas the highest pulp/peel ratio was registered by T7 and T4 treatments in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full chemical fertilization gave the greatest leaf total carbohydrates; T4 and T7 followed without a significant difference between them.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
full dose of chemical fertilization (100% RD)e0
Outcome
leaf total carbohydratese0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T4 and T7 treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Banana plants received the full dose of chemical fertilization (100% RD) is being the most promising one for inducing the greatest leaf total carbohydrates, N, P and K percentage, followed in descending order by T4 and T7 treatments without significant difference between them in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full chemical fertilization gave the greatest N, P and K percentage; T4 and T7 followed without a significant difference between them.

Taxon
Bananat0
Material
Grande Nainet0
Treatment
full dose of chemical fertilization (100% RD)e0
Outcome
N, P and K percentagee0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
in the two seasonse0
Comparator
T4 and T7 treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Banana Grande Naine Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Banana plants received the full dose of chemical fertilization (100% RD) is being the most promising one for inducing the greatest leaf total carbohydrates, N, P and K percentage, followed in descending order by T4 and T7 treatments without significant difference between them in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1808 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · MusaPositive and negative results

41 papers: 36 positive, 5 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

91 papers: 80 positive, 11 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

87 papers more in this group

See all 91 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.