Paper · 2019 · Scholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)

Going back to the soil: An integrated approach to farming.

Renée Christie

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Agricultural productivity is often constrained by nutrient availability; as such, copious amounts of synthetic fertilizers are applied to maintain productivity. However, the intensive use of synthetic fertilizers has reduced the capacity of the soil to carry out crucial roles such as nutrient cycling because of shifts in the microbial community composition and structure. In addition, much of the applied synthetic fertilizers become lost to the environment through run-off, which contributes to soil degradation. With the increasing demand on agricultural systems to provide food and fibre and the adverse impacts of agricultural production on the soil resource, amendments that support soil productivity are required to supply plant nutrients. One way of sustainably improving nutrient acquisition and retention is by improving soil fertility; this can be achieved through integrative farming strategies that increase organic matter levels and stimulate the microbial community. In this greenhouse study, an integrative approach that relied on plant-soil-microbe interactions was used to evaluate the usage of an agromineral as a slow-release fertilizer. This assessment was done by comparing the effects of an agromineral, the Spanish River Carbonatite (SRC), and a synthetic fertilizer (Nitrogen-Phosphorus-Potassium (NPK), 20-20-20) on soil pH, microbial abundance and respiration, as well as on the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. I hypothesized that the SRC, rich in calcium and other essential plant nutrients, would raise soil pH, stimulate microbial abundance and respiration, and enhance the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis in comparison to the synthetic fertilizer. In addition, the microbial abundance and respiration would differ depending on the plants grown. A mix of leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops was grown for 56 days in soils treated with three soil amendments: SRC, ammonium nitrate, and NPK synthetic fertilizer. The cover crops were grown in the following pairs: 1) alfalfa and chicory and 2) red clover and oilseed radish. At harvest, soil treated with SRC had higher pH values (pH raised by 1.2 units) and exhibited a higher abundance of heterotrophic and symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria than those soils lacking the SRC amendment. This effect of SRC was observed in the rhizosphere of both cover crop combinations. However, the effect of soil amendments on the phosphate-solubilizing bacteria varied between cover crop combinations. The relative abundance of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria was enhanced by the SRC amendment in the rhizosphere of red clover and oilseed radish plants; in contrast, in the rhizosphere of intercropped alfalfa and chicory, the NPK fertilizer was the amendment that stimulated the abundance of the phosphate-solubilizer bacteria. Additionally, microbial respiration was reduced in soils treated with SRC compared to that of ammonia nitrate- and NPK fertilizer-treated soils. The results indicate that soil amendments were the drivers of soil pH and abundance of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing and heterotrophic microorganisms, as well as the drivers of microbial respiration, while the plant combination had more pronounced effects on the abundance of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Furthermore, the SRC amendment appeared to have enhanced the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis compared to amendments lacking SRC. These preliminary findings suggest that SRC as a slow-release fertilizer may be useful as part of an integrative strategy to improve soil fertility by stimulating microbial activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRC raised soil pH by 1.2 units.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
SRCe0
Outcome
soil treated with SRC had higher pH valuese0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.2 unitse0
Comparator
soils lacking the SRC amendmente0

Verbatim

e0

“soil treated with SRC had higher pH values (pH raised by 1.2 units) and exhibited a higher abundance of heterotrophic and symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria than those soils lacking the SRC amendment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2263 · show in text ↑
t0

“A mix of leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops was grown for 56 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRC increased heterotrophic bacterial abundance.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
SRCe0
Interactor
heterotrophice0
Outcome
abundance of heterotrophice0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
soils lacking the SRC amendmente0

Not reportedInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“soil treated with SRC had higher pH values (pH raised by 1.2 units) and exhibited a higher abundance of heterotrophic and symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria than those soils lacking the SRC amendment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2263 · show in text ↑
t0

“A mix of leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops was grown for 56 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRC increased symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
SRCe0
Interactor
symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0
Outcome
symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
soils lacking the SRC amendmente0

Not reportedInteractor role

Verbatim

e0

“soil treated with SRC had higher pH values (pH raised by 1.2 units) and exhibited a higher abundance of heterotrophic and symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria than those soils lacking the SRC amendment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2063–2263 · show in text ↑
t0

“A mix of leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops was grown for 56 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRC enhanced phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in red clover and oilseed radish rhizosphere.

Taxon
red clover and oilseed radish plantse0
Treatment
SRC amendmente0
Interactor
phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0
Outcome
relative abundance of phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The relative abundance of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria was enhanced by the SRC amendment in the rhizosphere of red clover and oilseed radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2466–2616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK stimulated phosphate-solubilizing bacteria in alfalfa and chicory rhizosphere.

Taxon
alfalfa and chicoryMedicago sativaCichorium intybuse0
Treatment
NPK fertilizere0
Interactor
phosphate-solubilizer bacteriae0
Outcome
abundance of the phosphate-solubilizer bacteriae0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the rhizosphere of intercropped alfalfa and chicory, the NPK fertilizer was the amendment that stimulated the abundance of the phosphate-solubilizer bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2631–2792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRC reduced soil microbial respiration compared with ammonium nitrate and NPK.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Treatment
SRCe0
Outcome
microbial respiratione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
ammonia nitrate- and NPK fertilizer-treated soilse0

Verbatim

e0

“microbial respiration was reduced in soils treated with SRC compared to that of ammonia nitrate- and NPK fertilizer-treated soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2807–2937 · show in text ↑
t0

“A mix of leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops was grown for 56 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1840 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant combination influenced phosphate-solubilizing bacterial abundance more than other measured microbial outcomes.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Interactor
phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0
Outcome
abundance of phosphate-solubilizing bacteriae0
Setting
plant combinatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the plant combination had more pronounced effects on the abundance of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3140–3242 · show in text ↑
t0

“A mix of leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops was grown for 56 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRC appeared to enhance legume-Rhizobium symbiosis over amendments without SRC.

Taxon
legumee0
Treatment
SRC amendmente0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0
Outcome
legume-Rhizobium symbiosise0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
amendments lacking SRCe0

Not reportedInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the SRC amendment appeared to have enhanced the legume-Rhizobium symbiosis compared to amendments lacking SRC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3256–3366 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Preliminary findings suggest SRC may be useful as a slow-release soil fertility amendment.

Taxon
cover cropst0
Outcome
SRC as a slow-release fertilizer may be useful as part of an integrative strategy to improve soil fertilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“These preliminary findings suggest that SRC as a slow-release fertilizer may be useful as part of an integrative strategy to improve soil fertility by stimulating microbial activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3367–3549 · show in text ↑
t0

“A mix of leguminous and non-leguminous cover crops was grown for 56 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1840 · show in text ↑

fertilization · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.