Abstract
The efficacy of dinotefuran 20% SG was evaluated against white backed planthopper (WBPH) and brown planthopper (BPH) in rice during 2016 and 2017. Doses of 30, 40 and 50 g a.i. along with imidacloprid 17.8 SL and quinalphos 25 EC @ 20 and 500 g a.i. ha−1, respectively were compared. The results revealed that dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1 proved significantly better(1.70–2.04 WBPH/hill; 2.02–2.61 BPH/hill) at 5, 7 and 10 days after spray as compared to imidacloprid (2.75–4.29 hoppers/hill), quinalphos (3.32–4.91 hoppers/hill) and untreated control (17.78–26.67 hoppers/hill) across all locations evaluated. The grain yield ha−1 was also significantly more with these treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Dinotefuran at 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1 yielded significantly lower white backed planthopper counts than comparison insecticides and untreated control.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1 - Treatment
- dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1e0
- Interactor
- white backed planthopper (WBPH)Sogatella furciferae1peste0
- Outcome
- WBPH/hille0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 1.70–2.04 WBPH/hille0
- Qualifier
- at 5, 7 and 10 days after spraye0
- Comparator
- imidaclopride0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1 proved significantly better(1.70–2.04 WBPH/hill; 2.02–2.61 BPH/hill) at 5, 7 and 10 days after spray as compared to imidacloprid (2.75–4.29 hoppers/hill), quinalphos (3.32–4.91 hoppers/hill) and untreated control (17.78–26.67 hoppers/hill)”
e1“The efficacy of dinotefuran 20% SG was evaluated against white backed planthopper (WBPH) and brown planthopper (BPH) in rice during 2016 and 2017. Doses of 30, 40 and 50 g a.i. along with imidacloprid 17.8 SL and quinalphos 25 EC @ 20 and 500 g a.i. ha−1, respectively were compared. The results revealed that dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
Dinotefuran at 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1 yielded significantly lower brown planthopper counts than comparison insecticides and untreated control.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1e0
- Interactor
- brown planthopper (BPH)
Nilaparvata lugense1peste0 - Outcome
- BPH/hille0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 2.02–2.61 BPH/hille0
- Qualifier
- at 5, 7 and 10 days after spraye0
- Comparator
- quinalphose0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1 proved significantly better(1.70–2.04 WBPH/hill; 2.02–2.61 BPH/hill) at 5, 7 and 10 days after spray as compared to imidacloprid (2.75–4.29 hoppers/hill), quinalphos (3.32–4.91 hoppers/hill) and untreated control (17.78–26.67 hoppers/hill)”
e1“The efficacy of dinotefuran 20% SG was evaluated against white backed planthopper (WBPH) and brown planthopper (BPH) in rice during 2016 and 2017. Doses of 30, 40 and 50 g a.i. along with imidacloprid 17.8 SL and quinalphos 25 EC @ 20 and 500 g a.i. ha−1, respectively were compared. The results revealed that dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1”
Claim · model-written summary
Dinotefuran treatments significantly increased rice grain yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae1
- Treatment
- dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1e1
- Outcome
- grain yield ha−1e0
- Direction
- moree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield ha−1 was also significantly more with these treatments”
e1“The efficacy of dinotefuran 20% SG was evaluated against white backed planthopper (WBPH) and brown planthopper (BPH) in rice during 2016 and 2017. Doses of 30, 40 and 50 g a.i. along with imidacloprid 17.8 SL and quinalphos 25 EC @ 20 and 500 g a.i. ha−1, respectively were compared. The results revealed that dinotefuran @ 40 and 50 g a.i. ha−1”
The same questions in other papers
dinotefuran · Nilaparvata lugens · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →dinotefuran · Sogatella furcifera · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
dinotefuran · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.