Paper · 2019 · HortScience

Investigation and Prevention of Cork Spot Disorder in ‘Akizuki’ Pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai)

Yan-xin Duan; Ying Xu; Ran Wang; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
17
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

‘Akizuki’ ( Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) is a dominant Asian pear cultivar with gradually increasing cultivation area in Shandong province. However, this cultivar is found susceptible to cork spot disorder in recent years. In this study, we explored the physiological-biochemical mechanism of cork spot disorder in pear fruit, and investigated the effectiveness of spraying calcium (Ca), boron (B) solution or prohexadione calcium (P-Ca) on cork spot incidence. Cork spotted fruit had the characteristics of significantly larger fruit size with shorter fruit pedicels. Compared with normal fruit, cork spotted fruit had lower content of total soluble solids, soluble and reducing sugar, and vitamin C. In addition, cork spotted fruit accumulated much higher levels of N and Mg, and lower levels of K and P. However, Ca deficiency was not observed in cork spotted fruit, on the contrary, we determined high concentrations of Ca and free Ca 2+ in disordered fruit. At the same time, the ratios of K/Ca, Mg/Ca, and (K+Mg)/Ca were significantly lower in cork spotted fruit as compared with normal fruit. Among all treatments, spraying with 3500 times dilution of P-Ca at 15-day intervals from 30 to 90 days after full bloom showed promise for reducing cork spot incidence in ‘Akizuki’ pear without affecting fruit quality attributes. This research herein reveals the physiological-biochemical characteristic of cork spot disorder, and implicates P-Ca as a potential tool to reduce cork spot incidence in Asian pear cultivar Akizuki.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cork spotted fruit were significantly larger.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
normal fruitt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cork spotted fruit had the characteristics of significantly larger fruit size with shorter fruit pedicels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
t1

“Compared with normal fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cork spotted fruit had shorter pedicels.

Organ / stage
fruit pedicelse0
Outcome
fruit pedicelse0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
normal fruitt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cork spotted fruit had the characteristics of significantly larger fruit size with shorter fruit pedicels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
t1

“Compared with normal fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cork spotted fruit had lower soluble solids, sugars and vitamin C.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
content of total soluble solids, soluble and reducing sugar, and vitamin Ce0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
normal fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with normal fruit, cork spotted fruit had lower content of total soluble solids, soluble and reducing sugar, and vitamin C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–695 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cork spotted fruit had higher N and Mg.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
levels of N and Mge0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
normal fruitt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cork spotted fruit accumulated much higher levels of N and Mg, and lower levels of K and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
t1

“Compared with normal fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cork spotted fruit had lower K and P.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
levels of K and Pe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
normal fruitt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cork spotted fruit accumulated much higher levels of N and Mg, and lower levels of K and P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
t1

“Compared with normal fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–589 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium deficiency was absent in cork spotted fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
Ca deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ca deficiency was not observed in cork spotted fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disordered fruit had high Ca and free Ca 2+ concentrations.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
concentrations of Ca and free Ca 2+e0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
normal fruitt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we determined high concentrations of Ca and free Ca 2+ in disordered fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
t1

“Compared with normal fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K/Ca, Mg/Ca and (K+Mg)/Ca ratios were significantly lower in cork spotted fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
ratios of K/Ca, Mg/Ca, and (K+Mg)/Cae0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
normal fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ratios of K/Ca, Mg/Ca, and (K+Mg)/Ca were significantly lower in cork spotted fruit as compared with normal fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-Ca sprays at 15-day intervals reduced cork spot incidence.

Material
‘Akizuki’e0
Treatment
spraying with 3500 times dilution of P-Ca at 15-day intervals from 30 to 90 days after full bloome0
Outcome
cork spot incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with 3500 times dilution of P-Ca at 15-day intervals from 30 to 90 days after full bloom showed promise for reducing cork spot incidence in ‘Akizuki’ pear without affecting fruit quality attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The P-Ca spray did not affect fruit quality attributes.

Material
‘Akizuki’e0
Treatment
spraying with 3500 times dilution of P-Ca at 15-day intervals from 30 to 90 days after full bloome0
Outcome
fruit quality attributese0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying with 3500 times dilution of P-Ca at 15-day intervals from 30 to 90 days after full bloom showed promise for reducing cork spot incidence in ‘Akizuki’ pear without affecting fruit quality attributes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1323 · show in text ↑

prohexadione · quality: grain · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

prohexadione · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: grain · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · disease · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.