Paper · 2019 · Precision agriculture '19

Accuracy of crop coefficient estimation methods based on satellite imagery

O. Beeri; R. Pelta; T. Shilo; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The crop coefficient (Kc) is a crucial factor in irrigation decision making. The ability to estimate it directly from satellite imagery can immensely assist growers around the globe in their crop monitoring. Direct estimations of Kc from diverse spectral indices, enable the use of various multi-spectral sensors and increase the ability to map relatively small plots (<1.0 ha). The goal of this study was to examine the accuracy of Kc estimations using different spectral indices with different satellite sensors. To achieve this goal, a database was created. Datasets included 126 satellite images and corresponding Kc from five flux tower sites over four irrigated crops (citrus, corn, alfalfa, and soybean). Kc was estimated remotely from five sensors, by applying previously published indices equations. The results show that the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) achieved the highest accuracy (RMSE<0.1 and nRMSE of 10%) among the indices, characterized by only minor accuracy differences between the sensors. The lowest accuracy among all crops was observed in citrus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI had the highest crop coefficient estimation accuracy among indices, with RMSE below 0.1 and nRMSE of 10%.

Taxon
citrus, corn, alfalfa, and soybeanCitrusGlycine maxMedicago sativaZea mays subsp. mayse1
Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
RMSE<0.1 and nRMSE of 10%e0
Comparator
the indicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) achieved the highest accuracy (RMSE<0.1 and nRMSE of 10%) among the indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“four irrigated crops (citrus, corn, alfalfa, and soybean)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–710 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI accuracy differed only slightly between satellite sensors.

Taxon
citrus, corn, alfalfa, and soybeanCitrusGlycine maxMedicago sativaZea mays subsp. mayse2
Outcome
accuracy differencese0
Qualifier
only minore0
Comparator
the sensorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“characterized by only minor accuracy differences between the sensors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–880 · show in text ↑
e2

“four irrigated crops (citrus, corn, alfalfa, and soybean)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–710 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop coefficient estimation accuracy was lowest in citrus among the crops.

Taxon
citrusCitruse0
Outcome
accuracye0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
all cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest accuracy among all crops was observed in citrus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1087 · show in text ↑