Abstract
Variable rainfall, water stress, and spring frost are the main challenges for cereal growers in the Mediterranean region. The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions was investigated through the adoption of no-till, supplemental irrigation and drought tolerant cultivars over a period of three years. Seasonal precipitation was 732, 336 and 685 mm in the first, second and third seasons, respectively. The second and third seasons were characterized by the occurrence of spring frost. No tillage did not affect productivity in either crop, while supplemental irrigation increased yield only in barley. For wheat, the grain yield was 60 and 43% respectively lower in the second and third seasons than in the first season. For barley, grain yield was 43% higher in the first season than the other two. The negative effect of frost on wheat yield was indirectly assessed by crop growth simulation. Principal component analysis shows that freezing temperatures associated with spring frost and rainfall both dictated crop growth and productivity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
No tillage did not affect wheat productivity.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- No tillagee0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“No tillage did not affect productivity in either crop”
t0“Cereal Production Systems”
e1“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
No tillage did not affect barley productivity.
- Taxon
- barley
Hordeum vulgaree1 - Treatment
- No tillagee0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“No tillage did not affect productivity in either crop”
e1“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental irrigation increased barley yield.
- Taxon
- barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- supplemental irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“supplemental irrigation increased yield only in barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental irrigation did not increase wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- supplemental irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“supplemental irrigation increased yield only in barley”
e1“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield was 60% lower in the second than the first season.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 60e0
- Comparator
- first seasone0
- Setting
- seconde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“For wheat, the grain yield was 60 and 43% respectively lower in the second and third seasons than in the first season.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield was 43% lower in the third than the first season.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 43%e0
- Comparator
- first seasone0
- Setting
- third seasonse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“For wheat, the grain yield was 60 and 43% respectively lower in the second and third seasons than in the first season.”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley grain yield was 43% higher in the first season than the other two.
- Taxon
- barley
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 43%e0
- Comparator
- other twoe0
- Setting
- first seasone0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“For barley, grain yield was 43% higher in the first season than the other two.”
Claim · model-written summary
Simulation indicated a negative effect of frost on wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- wheat yielde0
- Direction
- negativee0
- Setting
- froste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The negative effect of frost on wheat yield was indirectly assessed by crop growth simulation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Freezing temperatures and rainfall both dictated crop growth and productivity in principal component analysis.
- Taxon
- wheat and barley
Hordeum vulgare
Triticum aestivume1 - Outcome
- crop growth and productivitye0
- Setting
- freezing temperatures associated with spring frost and rainfalle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e0“Principal component analysis shows that freezing temperatures associated with spring frost and rainfall both dictated crop growth and productivity.”
e1“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 105 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.