Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Assessing the Potential of Cereal Production Systems to Adapt to Contrasting Weather Conditions in the Mediterranean Region

Marie Therese Abi Saab; Mohamed Houssemeddine Sellami; Pasquale Giorio; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Variable rainfall, water stress, and spring frost are the main challenges for cereal growers in the Mediterranean region. The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions was investigated through the adoption of no-till, supplemental irrigation and drought tolerant cultivars over a period of three years. Seasonal precipitation was 732, 336 and 685 mm in the first, second and third seasons, respectively. The second and third seasons were characterized by the occurrence of spring frost. No tillage did not affect productivity in either crop, while supplemental irrigation increased yield only in barley. For wheat, the grain yield was 60 and 43% respectively lower in the second and third seasons than in the first season. For barley, grain yield was 43% higher in the first season than the other two. The negative effect of frost on wheat yield was indirectly assessed by crop growth simulation. Principal component analysis shows that freezing temperatures associated with spring frost and rainfall both dictated crop growth and productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage did not affect wheat productivity.

Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tillage did not affect productivity in either crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cereal Production Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52 · show in text ↑
e1

“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage did not affect barley productivity.

Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tillage did not affect productivity in either crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–571 · show in text ↑
e1

“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation increased barley yield.

Treatment
supplemental irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplemental irrigation increased yield only in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation did not increase wheat yield.

Treatment
supplemental irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplemental irrigation increased yield only in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was 60% lower in the second than the first season.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
60e0
Comparator
first seasone0
Setting
seconde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat, the grain yield was 60 and 43% respectively lower in the second and third seasons than in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield was 43% lower in the third than the first season.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
first seasone0
Setting
third seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For wheat, the grain yield was 60 and 43% respectively lower in the second and third seasons than in the first season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield was 43% higher in the first season than the other two.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
other twoe0
Setting
first seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For barley, grain yield was 43% higher in the first season than the other two.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–832 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulation indicated a negative effect of frost on wheat yield.

Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
negativee0
Setting
froste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The negative effect of frost on wheat yield was indirectly assessed by crop growth simulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–927 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing temperatures and rainfall both dictated crop growth and productivity in principal component analysis.

Outcome
crop growth and productivitye0
Setting
freezing temperatures associated with spring frost and rainfalle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal component analysis shows that freezing temperatures associated with spring frost and rainfall both dictated crop growth and productivity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“The potential of wheat and barley to adapt to contrasting weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–198 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

109 papers: 83 positive, 26 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 105 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.