Paper · 2019 · Asian Plant Research Journal

Population Incidence and Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder (Cnaphnalocrocis medinalis Guenee) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera)

Muhammad Bilal; Mubashar Hussain; Muhammad Umer; et al.

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Rice leaffolder has become a serious pest in the last two decades. It causes up to 50 to 70 percent leaf damage and consequently up to 46 percent yield losses in case of severe infestation. A field experiment was conducted at Rice Research Institute, Kala Shah Kaku Punjab Pakistan in which population incidence of rice leaffolder and efficacy of different insecticides evaluated. Population observed form end August to termination of Kharif season. Highest population of rice leaffolder was recorded in September and October. Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective. Insecticide treatedplots yielded higher than the control. Highest 3.62 t/ha was recorded with Hoopoe 4G and lowest with Star 4G 2.99 t/ha as compared to 1.95 t/ha of control. All treatments were statistically at par with each other but significantly different from control. In case of yield benefits, 34.78 percent to 46.27 percent increase was recorded. All the treatments were proved statistically at par against beneficial fauna.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice leaffolder population was highest in September and October.

Interactor
rice leaffolderCnaphalocrocis medinalise1pest
Outcome
population of rice leaffoldere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cnaphalocrocis medinalis
Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · InteractorQuartl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Population Incidence and Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest population of rice leaffolder was recorded in September and October”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–525 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide-treated rice plots yielded higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Insecticide treatedplotse2
Interactor
rice leaffolderCnaphalocrocis medinalist0pest
Outcome
yieldede2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cnaphalocrocis medinalis
Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · InteractorQuartl · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“Insecticide treatedplots yielded higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoopoe 4G gave the highest rice yield, 3.62 t/ha, against 1.95 t/ha in the control.

Treatment
Hoopoe 4Ge3
Outcome
Higheste3
Direction
Higheste3
Value
3.62 t/hae3
Qualifier
1.95 t/ha of controle3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest 3.62 t/ha was recorded with Hoopoe 4G and lowest with Star 4G 2.99 t/ha as compared to 1.95 t/ha of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Star 4G gave the lowest rice yield among the insecticide treatments, 2.99 t/ha.

Treatment
Star 4Ge3
Outcome
loweste3
Direction
loweste3
Value
2.99 t/hae3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest 3.62 t/ha was recorded with Hoopoe 4G and lowest with Star 4G 2.99 t/ha as compared to 1.95 t/ha of control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide treatment increased rice yield benefits by 34.78 to 46.27 percent over the control.

Treatment
Insecticide treatedplotse2
Outcome
yield benefitse4
Direction
increasee4
Value
34.78 percent to 46.27 percente4
Comparator
the controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“Insecticide treatedplots yielded higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1124 · show in text ↑
e4

“In case of yield benefits, 34.78 percent to 46.27 percent increase was recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticide treatments were significantly different from the control, though statistically at par with each other.

Treatment
All treatmentse5
Outcome
significantly different from controle5
Direction
significantly differente5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e5

“All treatments were statistically at par with each other but significantly different from control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1340 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide treatments were statistically at par against beneficial fauna.

Treatment
All the treatmentse6
Outcome
statistically at par against beneficial faunae6
Direction
at pare6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“All the treatments were proved statistically at par against beneficial fauna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) gave 86.65% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
86.65%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) gave 85.25% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
85.25%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) gave 85.85 efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
85.85e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) gave 89.53% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
89.53%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) gave 82.77% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
82.77%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) gave 78.40% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
78.40%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) gave 86.83% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
86.83%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) gave 72.05% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
72.05%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) gave 91.21% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
91.21%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) gave 84.18% efficacy against rice leaffolder.

Treatment
Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride)e7
Outcome
effectivee7
Direction
increaseinferrede7
Value
84.18%e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficacy of Chemical Control against Rice Leaffolder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“Insecticides, proved, viz., Karate 2.5EC (Lambda cyhalothrin) @ 160ml 86.65%, Pravo 10EC (fipronil +lambda cyhalothrin) @ 300 ml 85.25%, Hoopoe 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 85.85, Oncol 3G (Benfuracarb) @8 Kg 89.53%, Mover Plus 4.3G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 4.5 Kg 82.77%, Star 4G (cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 78.40%, Padan 4G(cartap hydrochloride) @ 9 kg 86.83%, Virtako 0.6G (thiamethoxam + chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 72.05%, Ferterra 0.4G (Chlorantraniliprole) @ 4 kg 91.21%, Paidan 8G (Cartap hydrochloride) 8 kg 84.18% effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–1066 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

60 papers: 50 positive, 10 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

insecticide · Cnaphalocrocis medinalis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.