Paper · 1985 · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)

Development Of Cassava (Manihot Esculenta Crantz) Leaf Meal As An Animal Feed

V. Ravindran

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Research was conducted in Sri Lanka to evaluate the feasibility of developing cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) leaf meal as an animal feed. In feeding trials with broilers, improvements in performance were observed at 10% inclusion of cassava leaf meal (CLM). High levels (20 and 30%) of CLM depressed gain, feed intake and feed per gain. Weights of spleen and liver (% of body weight) linearly increased with increasing levels of CLM. Carcass pigmentation values favored the CLM-based diets. Dietary additives (methionine, sodium thiosulfate or soybean oil plus methionine) improved the growth of broilers fed 20% CLM diet without, however, having any beneficial effect when added to the basal diet. Gain of broilers tended to decrease with increasing dietary levels of cyanide. Feeding trials with growing pigs showed that CLM can be included up to 26.7% level without any effect on performance. Gain and feed per gain were improved at 13.3% CLM level, whereas marked depressions were noted at 40% CLM level. Results of the balance trials indicated that cassava leaf protein is utilized more efficiently by the pigs, although the nutrients in CLM are not as digestible as those in coconut oil meal. The overall results suggest that bulkiness, low energy content, methionine deficiency and presence of anti-nutritional factors, are the major factors limiting the high level use of CLM in non-ruminant diets. Studies on the processing of CLM revealed that simple drying is sufficient to eliminate almost 90% of the initial cyanide level in the fresh cassava leaves. A combination of chopping and 3-day wilting prior to drying proved most effective in lowering the cyanide level of CLM. Field trials conducted with a short-age cassava variety, MU 22, demonstrated that it is possible to increase cassava leaf dry matter yields by defoliating once during the growing season and to produce within 86% of the normal yield of roots. Two defoliations during the growing season depressed the root crop by more than half.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One defoliation increased cassava leaf dry matter yield.

Material
MU 22e0
Treatment
defoliating once during the growing seasone0
Outcome
cassava leaf dry matter yieldse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field trials conducted with a short-age cassava variety, MU 22, demonstrated that it is possible to increase cassava leaf dry matter yields by defoliating once during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1873 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One defoliation retained root yield within 86% of normal yield.

Treatment
defoliating oncee1
Outcome
yield of rootse0
Value
86%e0
Comparator
normal yield of rootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“produce within 86% of the normal yield of roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1881–1928 · show in text ↑
e1

“defoliating once during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two defoliations reduced the cassava root crop by more than half.

Treatment
Two defoliations during the growing seasone0
Outcome
root crope0
Direction
depressede0
Value
more than halfe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two defoliations during the growing season depressed the root crop by more than half”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1930–2014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results differ

26 papers: 13 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

climate site · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.