Paper · 2019 · Crop Science

Mixture Mixed Models: Biennial Growth as a Latent Variable in Coffee Bean Progenies

Indalécio Cunha Vieira Júnior; Carlos Pereira da Silva; Joel Jorge Nuvunga; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Statistical analysis of Coffea arabica L. progeny production has been a great challenge. In this species, genotypes may present differential biennial behaviors due to different physiological responses to the environmental conditions, indicating a mixture of two subpopulations in the tested progenies. Previously proposed statistical methods are unable to handle data overdispersion and/or bimodality because they assume the same stochastic process generating different phenotypes. This study proposes a finite mixture mixed model for modeling the biennial patterns. Production data for 21 S 0:1 progenies, evaluated through eight harvests, were used. Individual (per harvest) and repeated measures analyses were performed using conventional mixed models and Gaussian mixture mixed models. The proposed methodology is also illustrated in a simulation study. On a real dataset, the approximated prediction error variance, CV, and residual variance were drastically reduced using mixture mixed models, resulting in a higher estimated heritability and expected gain from selection. Residual dependence across years was lower for the mixture model, but no differences were observed in genetic correlations. The posterior probability matrix captured the biennial pattern, which indicates the probability of a progeny's physiological stage. The Spearman correlation coefficient (0.87) indicates that selection based on grouped means may not be efficient. In general, the proposed model was more efficient for higher subpopulations means differences. The results suggest that for analysis of C. arabica progenies exhibiting different biennial patterns, mixture mixed models are superior to traditional mixed models and to models that structure biennial effects using covariance matrices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixture models drastically reduced prediction error variance, CV and residual variance on real coffee data.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
prediction error variance, CV, and residual variancee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
mixture mixed modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“approximated prediction error variance, CV, and residual variance were drastically reduced using mixture mixed models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixture models produced higher estimated heritability.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
estimated heritabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
selectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher estimated heritability and expected gain from selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixture models produced higher expected gain from selection.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
expected gain from selectione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
estimated heritabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher estimated heritability and expected gain from selection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual dependence across years was lower for the mixture model.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
Residual dependence across yearse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
mixture modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residual dependence across years was lower for the mixture model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic correlations did not differ between models.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
genetic correlationse0
Direction
no differencese0
Value
no differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences were observed in genetic correlations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1210 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The posterior probability matrix captured progeny biennial patterns.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
biennial patterne0
Value
probabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“posterior probability matrix captured the biennial pattern, which indicates the probability of a progeny's physiological stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spearman correlation of 0.87 suggested grouped-mean selection may be inefficient.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
selection based on grouped meanse0
Value
0.87e0
Qualifier
may not be efficiente0

Not reportedMaterialDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spearman correlation coefficient (0.87) indicates that selection based on grouped means may not be efficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The proposed model was more efficient when subpopulation means differed more.

Taxon
CoffeeCoffeat0
Outcome
more efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
higher subpopulations means differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea
Coffea · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proposed model was more efficient for higher subpopulations means differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Coffee Bean Progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–83 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude mixture mixed models are superior for progenies with distinct biennial patterns.

Taxon
C. arabicaCoffea arabicae0
Outcome
mixture mixed models are superiore0
Comparator
traditional mixed modelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coffea arabica
Coffea arabica · TaxonMarcelo Corrêa · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for analysis of C. arabica progenies exhibiting different biennial patterns, mixture mixed models are superior to traditional mixed models and to models that structure biennial effects using covariance matrices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1788 · show in text ↑