Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Genetic Divergence Studies in Marigold (Tagetes erecta)

Sangita Mahanta; Madhumita Choudhury Talukdar; Pranab Talukdar

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was laid out in a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications to evaluate genetic diversity of 12 varieties of marigold using Multivariate genetic divergence analysis (Mahalanobis, 1936). Based on D2 values, all the 12 marigold varieties were grouped into two clusters. Cluster I consisted of 11 varieties, viz., Pusa Narangi Gainda, Pusa Basanti Gainda, Pusa Arpita, Hajo Orange, Mumbai Orange, Hajo Yellow, Sunrise Orange, Hawaii Orange, Calcutta Orange, Calcutta Yellow, Yellow Babuda; while cluster II consisted of only Seracole. The inter-cluster distance between the two clusters I and II was found to be 190.58. The cluster means for most of the characters differed considerably. The intra- cluster distance of cluster I was 42.09 while it was zero for cluster II being with only one variety. The inter-cluster distance being larger than the intra cluster distance suggested wider genetic diversity among the varieties at the two different clusters indicating that crosses may be attempted between the varieties of the cluster I with that of Seracole, the only variety of cluster II to obtain new desirable recombinants in marigold.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 12 marigold varieties were grouped into two clusters, with cluster II consisting only of Seracole.

Taxon
Tagetes erectaTagetes erectat0
Outcome
grouped into two clusterse1
Qualifier
cluster II consisted of only Seracolee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes erecta
Tagetes erecta · TaxonHitroMilanese · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Marigold (Tagetes erecta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Based on D2 values, all the 12 marigold varieties were grouped into two clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–292 · show in text ↑
e2

“while cluster II consisted of only Seracole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–556 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inter-cluster distance (190.58) was larger than the intra cluster distance of cluster I (42.09) among marigold varieties.

Taxon
Tagetes erectaTagetes erectat0
Outcome
inter-cluster distancee1
Direction
largere2
Value
190.58e1
Qualifier
42.09e3
Comparator
intra cluster distancee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes erecta
Tagetes erecta · TaxonHitroMilanese · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Marigold (Tagetes erecta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The inter-cluster distance between the two clusters I and II was found to be 190.58”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–641 · show in text ↑
e2

“The inter-cluster distance being larger than the intra cluster distance suggested wider genetic diversity among the varieties at the two different clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–979 · show in text ↑
e3

“The intra- cluster distance of cluster I was 42.09”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster means differed considerably for most characters among marigold varieties.

Taxon
Tagetes erectaTagetes erectat0
Outcome
cluster means for most of the characterse1
Qualifier
differed considerablye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes erecta
Tagetes erecta · TaxonHitroMilanese · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Marigold (Tagetes erecta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cluster means for most of the characters differed considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–709 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend crossing cluster I varieties with Seracole to obtain new desirable marigold recombinants.

Taxon
Tagetes erectaTagetes erectat0
Outcome
new desirable recombinantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tagetes erecta
Tagetes erecta · TaxonHitroMilanese · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Marigold (Tagetes erecta)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“indicating that crosses may be attempted between the varieties of the cluster I with that of Seracole, the only variety of cluster II to obtain new desirable recombinants in marigold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1162 · show in text ↑