Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

Biological and chemical protection of melon crops against Myiopardalis pardalina Bigot

Bayan Toyzhigitova; Saparbek Yskak; Bożena Łozowicka; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The aim of this project was to explore the cycle of the pest’s development and to evaluate the efficacy of insecticides from the pyrethroid, organophosphate and neonicotinoids groups in controlling Myiopardalis pardalina Bigot in melon plantations under the conditions of Southeast Asia. Three kinds of traps were tested (pheromone, stick and feeding) for monitoring quarantine flies. The application of thiamethoxam/cyhalothrin (A) and chlorpyrifos/cypermethrin (B) in variant A, B, A in dose 0,2; 0,5; 0,2 l/ha was more effective than threefold applications of chlorpyrifos/cypermethrin in variant B, B, B in dose 0,7; 0,7; 0,7 l/ha during the growing season. Among all traps used, the lowest degree of melon damage (8.8%) was noted only for the variant with 10 pheromone traps per hectare, where the crop yield of melon was slightly higher than in the case of the other traps (16.63 t/ha). The combination A, B, A improved the quality of fruit, decreased melon infestation with ovipositor marks and significantly reduced fly population up to 14 days. Only chlorpyrifos residues were determined in melon after harvesting at an acceptable level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The A, B, A insecticide sequence was more effective than the B, B, B sequence.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
variant A, B, A in dose 0,2; 0,5; 0,2 l/hae1
Outcome
more effectivee1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
variant B, B, B in dose 0,7; 0,7; 0,7 l/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“melon plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–247 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of thiamethoxam/cyhalothrin (A) and chlorpyrifos/cypermethrin (B) in variant A, B, A in dose 0,2; 0,5; 0,2 l/ha was more effective than threefold applications of chlorpyrifos/cypermethrin in variant B, B, B in dose 0,7; 0,7; 0,7 l/ha during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten pheromone traps per hectare had the lowest melon damage, 8.8%.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
10 pheromone traps per hectaree0
Outcome
melon damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
8.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest degree of melon damage (8.8%) was noted only for the variant with 10 pheromone traps per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon yield with ten pheromone traps per hectare was slightly higher than with other traps, at 16.63 t/ha.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
10 pheromone traps per hectaree0
Outcome
crop yield of melone0
Direction
slightly highere0
Value
16.63 t/hae0
Comparator
the other trapse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the variant with 10 pheromone traps per hectare, where the crop yield of melon was slightly higher than in the case of the other traps (16.63 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The A, B, A sequence improved melon fruit quality.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
A, B, Ae1
Outcome
quality of fruite1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“melon plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–247 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination A, B, A improved the quality of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–946 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The A, B, A sequence decreased melon infestation with ovipositor marks.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
A, B, Ae0
Outcome
melon infestation with ovipositor markse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination A, B, A improved the quality of fruit, decreased melon infestation with ovipositor marks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The A, B, A sequence significantly reduced fly population for up to 14 days.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
A, B, Ae1
Interactor
flye1pest
Outcome
fly populatione1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
up to 14 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“melon plantations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–247 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination A, B, A improved the quality of fruit, decreased melon infestation with ovipositor marks and significantly reduced fly population up to 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only chlorpyrifos residues were detected in harvested melon, at an acceptable level.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Organ / stage
after harvestinge0
Outcome
chlorpyrifos residuese0
Qualifier
at an acceptable levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only chlorpyrifos residues were determined in melon after harvesting at an acceptable level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1145 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · pest · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.