Paper · 2019 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Postharvest application of potassium silicate improves keeping quality of banana

N. G. D. N. Nikagolla; M. Y. Udugala-Ganehenege; W. A. M. Daundasekera

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

GRAS (General-Regarded-As-Safe) compounds play a considerable role in food industry to secure the food safety and environmental sustainability. Soluble silicon (Si) acts as a disease control agent for many plants. Climacteric pattern of ripening and postharvest diseases limit the shelf life of banana during transportation to local and overseas destinations. The ability of banana fruit to absorb Si upon postharvest dip treatment and if so, the absorption of Si confers any effects on disease reduction and keeping quality, were investigated. Banana dipped in 1500 µg mL−1 silicon for 20 minutes showed longer shelf life among different Si concentration × dipping time treatment combinations. Si treatment resulted significantly lower rates of ethylene production, respiration and delayed time taken for fungal rot development compared to non Si-treated (control) fruit. Total soluble silicon content in peel tissues was significantly higher [0.54% dry weight (dw)] in Si-treated versus control fruit (0.13% dw). Si treatment had no effect on total Si content, total soluble solids (TSS) content, titratable acidity (TA) or antioxidant activity in banana fruit pulp. This indicates that dip-treatment allowed Si to penetrate and remain in peel without reaching fruit pulp while extending the shelf life without altering the organoleptic properties of banana fruit pulp.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 1500 µg mL−1 silicon dip for 20 minutes gave the longest banana shelf life among tested combinations.

Taxon
Bananae0
Treatment
1500 µg mL−1 silicon for 20 minutese0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
different Si concentration × dipping time treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Banana dipped in 1500 µg mL−1 silicon for 20 minutes showed longer shelf life among different Si concentration × dipping time treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–693 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon treatment lowered banana ethylene production and respiration rates.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Si treatmente0
Outcome
rates of ethylene production, respiratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
non Si-treated (control) fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“Si treatment resulted significantly lower rates of ethylene production, respiration and delayed time taken for fungal rot development compared to non Si-treated (control) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon treatment delayed fungal rot development.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Si treatmente0
Outcome
fungal rot developmente0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
non Si-treated (control) fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“Si treatment resulted significantly lower rates of ethylene production, respiration and delayed time taken for fungal rot development compared to non Si-treated (control) fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble silicon in treated peel was 0.54% dry weight versus 0.13% in controls.

Taxon
bananat0
Organ / stage
peel tissuese0
Treatment
Si-treatede0
Outcome
Total soluble silicon contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.54% dry weight (dw)e0
Qualifier
0.13% dwe0
Comparator
control fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“Total soluble silicon content in peel tissues was significantly higher [0.54% dry weight (dw)] in Si-treated versus control fruit (0.13% dw)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon treatment had no effect on pulp silicon, soluble solids, acidity, or antioxidant activity.

Taxon
bananae0
Organ / stage
fruit pulpe0
Treatment
Si treatmente0
Outcome
total Si content, total soluble solids (TSS) content, titratable acidity (TA) or antioxidant activitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si treatment had no effect on total Si content, total soluble solids (TSS) content, titratable acidity (TA) or antioxidant activity in banana fruit pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1167 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · quality: sugar starch · MusaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · disease · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.