Paper · 2019 · Plants

Silicon Promotes Agronomic Performance in Brassica napus Cultivated under Field Conditions with Two Nitrogen Fertilizer Inputs

Philippe Laîné; Cylia Haddad; Mustapha Arkoun; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To limit the environmental pollution associated with intensive nitrogen (N) fertilizer usage, alternative cultural practices must be considered for crops requiring high N inputs such as rapeseed. In this context, the effects of silicon (Si) supply on the agronomic performance of rapeseed cultivated under field conditions with two N fertilizer levels (60 and 160 kg ha−1) were studied. Results showed that Si supplied in the form of silicic acid (12 kg ha−1) has no effect on the agronomic performance of plants cultivated with the lower N input. In contrast, in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1, Si supply promotes the preservation of green leaves (until the flowering stage) and at harvest stage, increases biomass, yield, and seed micronutrient concentrations (especially cobalt and iron). The agronomic indexes show that the increase in seed yield is related to a better uptake of N from the soil by Si-treated plants, but is not an improvement in N mobilization towards the seeds. This study showed that Si supply combined with high N inputs (160 kg ha−1) improves usage of N fertilizer and yield. The possibility that a Si supply could allow for a reduction in N input without altering the yield of rapeseed is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon had no effect on agronomic performance at lower nitrogen input.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Si supplied in the form of silicic acid (12 kg ha−1)e0
Outcome
agronomic performancee0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
lower N inpute0
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si supplied in the form of silicic acid (12 kg ha−1) has no effect on the agronomic performance of plants cultivated with the lower N input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–546 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions with two N fertilizer levels (60 and 160 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high nitrogen input, silicon preserved green leaves through flowering.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
Si supplye0
Outcome
preservation of green leavese0
Direction
promotese0
Qualifier
in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1, Si supply promotes the preservation of green leaves (until the flowering stage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–681 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased biomass at high nitrogen input.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Si supplye0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1, Si supply promotes the preservation of green leaves (until the flowering stage) and at harvest stage, increases biomass, yield, and seed micronutrient concentrations (especially cobalt and iron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased yield at high nitrogen input.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Si supplye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1, Si supply promotes the preservation of green leaves (until the flowering stage) and at harvest stage, increases biomass, yield, and seed micronutrient concentrations (especially cobalt and iron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon increased seed micronutrient concentrations at high nitrogen input.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Si supplye0
Outcome
seed micronutrient concentrationse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plants fertilized with 160 kg N ha−1, Si supply promotes the preservation of green leaves (until the flowering stage) and at harvest stage, increases biomass, yield, and seed micronutrient concentrations (especially cobalt and iron)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–796 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–322 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield increase was related to better nitrogen uptake from soil.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Si-treatede0
Outcome
increase in seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
better uptake of N from the soile0

Verbatim

e0

“the increase in seed yield is related to a better uptake of N from the soil by Si-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–926 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon did not improve nitrogen mobilization toward seeds.

Taxon
rapeseede2
Treatment
Si-treatede1
Outcome
N mobilization towards the seedse0
Direction
not an improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“not an improvement in N mobilization towards the seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–926 · show in text ↑
e2

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon with high nitrogen input improved nitrogen fertilizer use.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Si supply combined with high N inputs (160 kg ha−1)e0
Outcome
usage of N fertilizere0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Si supply combined with high N inputs (160 kg ha−1) improves usage of N fertilizer and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed cultivated under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–322 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.