Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Effect of Date of Sowing and Nutrient Management on Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica L.)

P. Mubeena; A. S. Halepyati; B. M. Chittapur

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications. The treatments consisted of four sowing dates (second fortnight of June, first fortnight of July, second fortnight of July and first fortnight of August) and three levels of RDF (75%, 100% and 125% RDF). The results revealed that, early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46). However, it was found to be on par with first fortnight of July. A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively) and it was in turn on par with 125% RDF. But, interaction effect of date of sowing and nutrient management was found to be non significant with respect to nutrient uptake and yield. Sowing during second fortnight of June in combination with application of 100% RDF noted significantly higher grain yield (2424 kg ha-1), stover yield (9350 kg ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.51).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June recorded higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
uptake of nitrogene1
Direction
highere1
Value
112.12 kg ha-1e1
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June recorded higher phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
phosphoruse1
Direction
highere1
Value
10.82 kg ha-1e1
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June recorded higher potassium (60.66 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
highere1
Value
60.66 kg ha-1e1
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June recorded higher grain yield (2368 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
2368 kg ha-1e1
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June recorded higher stover yield (8916 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
8916 kg ha-1e1
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June recorded higher net returns (` 24978 ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
net returnse1
Direction
highere1
Value
` 24978 ha-1e1
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June recorded higher benefit cost ratio (2.46).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
2.46e1
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF application recorded higher nitrogen (99.74 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
nitrogene2
Direction
highere2
Value
99.74 kg ha-1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF application recorded higher phosphorus (9.19 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
phosphoruse2
Direction
highere2
Value
9.19 kg ha-1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF application recorded higher potassium (44.86 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
potassiume2
Direction
highere2
Value
44.86 kg ha-1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF application recorded higher grain yield (2140 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
2140 kg ha-1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF application recorded higher stover yield (7176 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
stover yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
7176 kg ha-1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF application recorded higher net return (` 19394 ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
net returne2
Direction
highere2
Value
` 19394 ha-1e2
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF application recorded higher benefit cost ratio (2.13).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe2
Direction
highere2
Value
2.13e2
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing in the second fortnight of June was on par with sowing in the first fortnight of July for nutrient uptake and yield.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
early sowing during second fortnight of Junee1
Outcome
nutrient uptake and yielde0
Direction
on pare3
Comparator
first fortnight of Julye3
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“early sowing during second fortnight of June recorded significantly higher uptake of nitrogen (112.12 kg ha-1), phosphorus (10.82 kg ha-1), potassium (60.66 kg ha-1), grain yield (2368 kg ha-1), stover yield (8916 kg ha-1) net returns (` 24978 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–829 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, it was found to be on par with first fortnight of July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF was on par with 125% RDF for nutrient uptake, yield and economics.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
application of 100% RDFe2
Outcome
nutrient uptake, yield and economicse2
Direction
on pare4
Comparator
125% RDFe4
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e2

“A higher nutrient uptake, yield and economics were recorded by the application of 100% RDF (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, grain yield, stover yield, net return, benefit cost ratio; 99.74 kg ha-1, 9.19 kg ha-1, 44.86 kg ha-1, 2140 kg ha-1 7176 kg ha-1, ` 19394 ha-1 and 2.13, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1187 · show in text ↑
e4

“and it was in turn on par with 125% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1227 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of date of sowing and nutrient management was non significant for nutrient uptake and yield.

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
date of sowing and nutrient managemente5
Outcome
nutrient uptake and yielde5
Direction
non significante5

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e5

“interaction effect of date of sowing and nutrient management was found to be non significant with respect to nutrient uptake and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the second fortnight of June with 100% RDF gave higher grain yield (2424 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
Sowing during second fortnight of June in combination with application of 100% RDFe6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
2424 kg ha-1e6
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sowing during second fortnight of June in combination with application of 100% RDF noted significantly higher grain yield (2424 kg ha-1), stover yield (9350 kg ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.51)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the second fortnight of June with 100% RDF gave higher stover yield (9350 kg ha-1).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
Sowing during second fortnight of June in combination with application of 100% RDFe6
Outcome
stover yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
9350 kg ha-1e6
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sowing during second fortnight of June in combination with application of 100% RDF noted significantly higher grain yield (2424 kg ha-1), stover yield (9350 kg ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.51)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the second fortnight of June with 100% RDF gave higher benefit cost ratio (2.51).

Taxon
foxtail milletSetaria italicae0
Treatment
Sowing during second fortnight of June in combination with application of 100% RDFe6
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe6
Direction
highere6
Value
2.51e6
Setting
College of Agriculture Farm, Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria italica
Setaria italica · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Marknesbitt assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment was conducted at College of Agriculture Farm, Raichur on medium black soil during kharif, 2017 to study the effect of date of sowing and nutrient management on nutrient uptake and yield of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–243 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sowing during second fortnight of June in combination with application of 100% RDF noted significantly higher grain yield (2424 kg ha-1), stover yield (9350 kg ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.51)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1565 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · yield · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 53 positive, 2 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Setaria italica (foxtail millet)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.