Paper · 2019 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Evaluation of Different Organic Fertilizers in the Sustainable Cultive of Coriander

Rafael Santiago da Costa; Letícia Kenia Bessa de Oliveira; José Lucas Guedes dos Santos; et al.

8
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The excessive use of agrochemicals in agriculture has been causing irreversible environmental impacts, from this point of view, organic farming appears as an economically viable alternative to minimize these impacts. So, the objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs. The experiment was conducted during the period from August to October 2016, in an area of the experimental farm of University of International Integration of Afro-Brazilian Lusophony. The experimental design was a randomized complete block design, in a 5 × 4 factorial scheme, consisting of five organic fertilizers and four harvesting epochs (28, 35, 42 and 49 days after planting-DAP) and five blocks. The variables stem diameter, plant height, root size, number of leaves, leaf length and productivity were evaluated. All the analyzed variables responded significantly by the F test, either for the qualitative factor, fertilizer sources, or the quantitative, epochs of evaluation. Regarding the cultivation epochs, when the first evaluation period (28 DAP) was compared with the last (49 DAP), it was verified that the variables presented linear responses over time, with increases of 34.4% for height , 29.5% for stem diameter, 37.07% for root length and 64.44% for production. In relation to the fertilizer sources, in general, the cattle manure provided a greater growth and production of the coriander plants, being therefore the most suitable for the cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer sources significantly affected stem diameter, plant height and root size of coriander.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
different types organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
stem diameter, plant height, root sizee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e2

“stem diameter, plant height, root size, number of leaves, leaf length and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–896 · show in text ↑
e3

“All the analyzed variables responded significantly by the F test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer sources significantly affected number of leaves, leaf length and productivity of coriander.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
different types organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
number of leaves, leaf length and productivitye2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e2

“stem diameter, plant height, root size, number of leaves, leaf length and productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–896 · show in text ↑
e3

“All the analyzed variables responded significantly by the F test”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriander height increased by 34.4% from 28 DAP to 49 DAP.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
harvesting epochse1
Outcome
heighte5
Direction
increasese5
Value
34.4%e5
Qualifier
linear responses over timee5
Comparator
first evaluation period (28 DAP)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“consisting of five organic fertilizers and four harvesting epochs (28, 35, 42 and 49 days after planting-DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–778 · show in text ↑
e4

“the first evaluation period (28 DAP) was compared with the last (49 DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1188 · show in text ↑
e5

“the variables presented linear responses over time, with increases of 34.4% for height , 29.5% for stem diameter, 37.07% for root length and 64.44% for production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriander stem diameter increased by 29.5% from 28 DAP to 49 DAP.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
harvesting epochse1
Outcome
stem diametere5
Direction
increasese5
Value
29.5%e5
Qualifier
linear responses over timee5
Comparator
first evaluation period (28 DAP)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“consisting of five organic fertilizers and four harvesting epochs (28, 35, 42 and 49 days after planting-DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–778 · show in text ↑
e4

“the first evaluation period (28 DAP) was compared with the last (49 DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1188 · show in text ↑
e5

“the variables presented linear responses over time, with increases of 34.4% for height , 29.5% for stem diameter, 37.07% for root length and 64.44% for production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriander root length increased by 37.07% from 28 DAP to 49 DAP.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
harvesting epochse1
Outcome
root lengthe5
Direction
increasese5
Value
37.07%e5
Qualifier
linear responses over timee5
Comparator
first evaluation period (28 DAP)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“consisting of five organic fertilizers and four harvesting epochs (28, 35, 42 and 49 days after planting-DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–778 · show in text ↑
e4

“the first evaluation period (28 DAP) was compared with the last (49 DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1188 · show in text ↑
e5

“the variables presented linear responses over time, with increases of 34.4% for height , 29.5% for stem diameter, 37.07% for root length and 64.44% for production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coriander production increased by 64.44% from 28 DAP to 49 DAP.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
harvesting epochse1
Outcome
productione5
Direction
increasese5
Value
64.44%e5
Qualifier
linear responses over timee5
Comparator
first evaluation period (28 DAP)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“consisting of five organic fertilizers and four harvesting epochs (28, 35, 42 and 49 days after planting-DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–778 · show in text ↑
e4

“the first evaluation period (28 DAP) was compared with the last (49 DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1188 · show in text ↑
e5

“the variables presented linear responses over time, with increases of 34.4% for height , 29.5% for stem diameter, 37.07% for root length and 64.44% for production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure gave greater growth and production of coriander than the other fertilizer sources.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
cattle manuree6
Outcome
growth and productione6
Direction
greatere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e6

“the cattle manure provided a greater growth and production of the coriander plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1508 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider cattle manure the most suitable organic fertilizer for coriander cultivation.

Taxon
corianderCoriandrum sativume0
Treatment
cattle manuree6
Outcome
the most suitable for the cultivatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Coriandrum sativum
Coriandrum sativum · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of different types organic fertilizers in the development and production of coriander harvested at different epochs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–390 · show in text ↑
e6

“the cattle manure provided a greater growth and production of the coriander plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1508 · show in text ↑
e7

“being therefore the most suitable for the cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1563 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Coriandrum sativum (coriander)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.