Abstract
The field experiments were conducted during kharif season of 2016 and 2017 at Punj ab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Bathinda, Punjab and Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. The experiment was conducted in RCBD and replicated thrice. Biofertilizers, viz. Azotobacter sp., Sphingobacterium sp., Burkholderia sp. and Streptomyces Vadius were used for seed treatment of sorghum before sowing. Total nind treatments were evaluated, Tt : RDF, T2: RDF +Azotobacter sp., T3: RDF+Azotobacter sp.+Sphingobacterium sp., T4: RDF+Azotobacter sp.+Burkholderia sp, T5: RDF + Azotobacter sp.+ Streptomyces badius , T6:75% of RDF + Azotobacter sp., T7:75% of RDF +Azotobacter sp.+ Sphingobacterium sp., Ts : 75% of RDF + Azotobacter sp.+ Burkholderia sp., T9:75% of RDF + Azotobacter sp.+ Streptomyces badius. The result revealed that nonetheless, in all the treatments in which microbial inoculants were applied along with chemical fertilizer, numeric increases were observed. The highest growth and yield attributes were observed in T4 treatment (RDF + Azotobacter sp.+Burkholderia sp.) at both the locations. The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana. This might be because ofmatching beneficial bacteria with their preferred crops, leading to optimized root colonization. Further, HCN content in all the treatments with microbial inoculants were slightly more than control but it was below permissible limit. In light of the results, it is concluded that the application of RDF + Azotobacter sp. + Burkholderia sp. recorded maximum green forage yield with good quality of forage sorghum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial inoculants with fertilizer produced numeric increases across treatments.
- Treatment
- microbial inoculants were applied along with chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- numeric increasese0
- Direction
- increasese0
SorghumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“in all the treatments in which microbial inoculants were applied along with chemical fertilizer, numeric increases were observed”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 had the highest growth attributes at both locations.
- Treatment
- T4 treatment (RDF + Azotobacter sp.+Burkholderia sp.)e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter sp.
Azotobactere0symbiont - Second interactor
- Burkholderia sp.
Burkholderiae0symbiont - Outcome
- growth and yield attributese0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest growth and yield attributes were observed in T4 treatment (RDF + Azotobacter sp.+Burkholderia sp.) at both the locations”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 had the highest yield attributes at both locations.
- Treatment
- T4 treatment (RDF + Azotobacter sp.+Burkholderia sp.)e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Burkholderia sp.Burkholderiae0symbiont
- Outcome
- yield attributese0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest growth and yield attributes were observed in T4 treatment (RDF + Azotobacter sp.+Burkholderia sp.) at both the locations”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased plant height over control by 3.89 at Bathinda and 4.72 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 3.89e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Bathindae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased leaves per plant over control by 11.28 at Bathinda and 12.44 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- leaves per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 11.28e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Bathindae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased tillers per plant over control by 9.6 at Bathinda.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- tillers per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 9.6e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Bathindae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased leaf/root ratio over control by 11.2 at Bathinda.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- leaf/root ratioe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 11.2e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Bathindae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased green fodder yield over control by 4.11 at Bathinda.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4.11e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Bathindae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased dry fodder yield over control by 4.28 at Bathinda.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- dry fodder yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4.28e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Bathindae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased plant height over control by 4.72 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 4.72e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Ludhianae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased leaves per plant over control by 12.44 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- leaves per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 12.44e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Ludhianae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased tillers per plant over control by 8.22 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- tillers per plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 8.22e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Ludhianae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased leaf/root ratio over control by 20.71 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- leaf/root ratioe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 20.71e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Ludhianae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased green fodder yield over control by 6.4 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 6.4e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Ludhianae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 increased dry fodder yield over control by 7.37 at Ludhiana.
- Treatment
- T4 treatmente0
- Outcome
- dry fodder yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 7.37e0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- Ludhianae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentage increase in plant height, leaves per plant, tillers per plant, leaf/root ratio, green fodder yield and dry fodder yield in T4 treatment over control was 3.89,11.28,9.6,11.2,4.11,4.28 and4.72,12.44.8.22,20.71,6.4,7.37, respectively at Bathinda and Ludhiana”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial inoculants slightly increased HCN content while remaining below the permissible limit.
- Treatment
- microbial inoculantse0
- Outcome
- HCN contente0
- Direction
- moree0
- Qualifier
- below permissible limite0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“HCN content in all the treatments with microbial inoculants were slightly more than control but it was below permissible limit”
t0“forage sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude RDF with Azotobacter and Burkholderia gives maximum green forage yield and good quality.
- Taxon
- forage sorghume0
- Treatment
- RDF + Azotobacter sp. + Burkholderia sp.e0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter sp.Azotobactere0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Burkholderia sp.Burkholderiae0symbiont
- Outcome
- maximum green forage yield with good qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of RDF + Azotobacter sp. + Burkholderia sp. recorded maximum green forage yield with good quality of forage sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · molecular: metabolites · SorghumPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.