Paper · 2019 · Food Science and Technology

Coating based on breadfruit starch (Artocarpus altilis) for fruit conservation: influence of glycerol, sorbitol, and mannitol as plasticizers

Erick dos Anjos BEZERRA; Edilayane da Nóbrega SANTOS; Natália Silva de FARIAS; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Polysaccharide-based coatings are an alternative to synthetic coatings for fruit conservation. On this study, we aim to evaluate the physical and chemical characteristics of breadfruit starch for coating using glycerol, sorbitol, and mannitol as plasticizers. We applied coatings composed of 7% starch and 2% plasticizers to cherry tomatoes, and evaluated the storage during 12 days at a temperature of 18 C. The breadfruit starch had an amylose content of 27.17%, granular size of 0.85-0.87, a gelatinization temperature of 75.10 C, characteristics of standard starch type B and low syneresis. Coatings composed of glycerol and sorbitol showed a reduction in mass loss and delayed ripening. Glycerol and sorbitol are recommended for preparing coatings based on breadfruit starch for post-harvest storage of tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breadfruit starch had 27.17% amylose.

Taxon
breadfruitArtocarpus altilist0
Outcome
amylose contente0
Value
27.17%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Artocarpus altilis
Artocarpus altilis · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The breadfruit starch had an amylose content of 27.17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“breadfruit starch (Artocarpus altilis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breadfruit starch granules measured 0.85-0.87.

Taxon
breadfruitArtocarpus altilist0
Outcome
granular sizee0
Value
0.85-0.87e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Artocarpus altilis
Artocarpus altilis · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“granular size of 0.85-0.87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“breadfruit starch (Artocarpus altilis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breadfruit starch gelatinized at 75.10 C.

Taxon
breadfruitArtocarpus altilist0
Outcome
gelatinization temperaturee0
Value
75.10 Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Artocarpus altilis
Artocarpus altilis · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a gelatinization temperature of 75.10 C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“breadfruit starch (Artocarpus altilis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–55 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Breadfruit starch had type B characteristics and low syneresis.

Taxon
breadfruitArtocarpus altilist0
Outcome
characteristics of standard starch type B and low syneresise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Artocarpus altilis
Artocarpus altilis · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“characteristics of standard starch type B and low syneresis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“breadfruit starch (Artocarpus altilis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycerol coating reduced cherry tomato mass loss.

Treatment
glycerole0
Outcome
mass losse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings composed of glycerol and sorbitol showed a reduction in mass loss and delayed ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–691 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol coating reduced cherry tomato mass loss.

Treatment
sorbitole0
Outcome
mass losse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings composed of glycerol and sorbitol showed a reduction in mass loss and delayed ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–691 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycerol coating delayed cherry tomato ripening.

Treatment
glycerole0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings composed of glycerol and sorbitol showed a reduction in mass loss and delayed ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–691 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol coating delayed cherry tomato ripening.

Treatment
sorbitole0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme · TaxonJS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings composed of glycerol and sorbitol showed a reduction in mass loss and delayed ripening.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–691 · show in text ↑
e1

“cherry tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–340 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended glycerol and sorbitol for breadfruit starch coatings for tomato storage.

Outcome
Glycerol and sorbitol are recommended for preparing coatings based on breadfruit starch for post-harvest storage of tomatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glycerol and sorbitol are recommended for preparing coatings based on breadfruit starch for post-harvest storage of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–817 · show in text ↑

glucitol · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glycerol · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.