Paper · 2019 · Weed Technology

Dicamba-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) in Kansas: characterization and management with fall- or spring-applied PRE herbicides

Vipan Kumar; Ryan P. Engel; Randall Currie; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Dicamba-resistant (DR) kochia is an increasing concern for growers in the US Great Plains, including Kansas. Greenhouse and field experiments (Garden City and Tribune, KS, in the 2014 to 2015 growing season) were conducted to characterize the dicamba resistance levels in two recently evolved DR kochia accessions collected from fallow fields (wheat–sorghum–fallow rotation) near Hays, KS, and to determine the effectiveness of various PRE herbicide tank mixtures applied in fall or spring prior to the fallow year. Dicamba dose–response studies indicated that the KS-110 and KS-113 accessions had 5- to 8-fold resistance to dicamba, respectively, relative to a dicamba-susceptible (DS) accession. In separate field studies, atrazine-based PRE herbicide tank mixtures, dicamba + pendimethalin + sulfentrazone, and metribuzin + sulfentrazone when applied in the spring had excellent kochia control (85% to 95%) for 3 to 4 mo at the Garden City and Tribune sites. In contrast, kochia control with those PRE herbicide tank mixtures when applied in the fall did not exceed 79% at the later evaluation dates. In conclusion, the tested kochia accessions from western Kansas had evolved moderate to high levels of resistance to dicamba. Growers should utilize these effective PRE herbicide tank mixtures (multiple sites of action) in early spring to manage kochia seed bank during the summer fallow phase of this 3-yr crop rotation (wheat–corn/sorghum–fallow) in the Central Great Plains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KS-110 kochia showed 5-fold dicamba resistance relative to a susceptible accession.

Material
KS-110e0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae2weed
Outcome
resistance to dicambae0
Direction
resistancee0
Value
5- to 8-folde0
Comparator
dicamba-susceptible (DS) accessione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the KS-110 and KS-113 accessions had 5- to 8-fold resistance to dicamba, respectively, relative to a dicamba-susceptible (DS) accession”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“fallow fields (wheat–sorghum–fallow rotation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–383 · show in text ↑
e2

“DR kochia accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–322 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KS-113 kochia showed 8-fold dicamba resistance relative to a susceptible accession.

Material
KS-113e0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae2weed
Outcome
resistance to dicambae0
Direction
resistancee0
Value
5- to 8-folde0
Comparator
dicamba-susceptible (DS) accessione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the KS-110 and KS-113 accessions had 5- to 8-fold resistance to dicamba, respectively, relative to a dicamba-susceptible (DS) accession”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“fallow fields (wheat–sorghum–fallow rotation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–383 · show in text ↑
e2

“DR kochia accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring atrazine-based PRE mixtures controlled kochia at 85% to 95% for 3 to 4 months.

Treatment
atrazine-based PRE herbicide tank mixturese0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae0weed
Outcome
kochia controle0
Direction
excellente0
Value
85% to 95%e0
Setting
Garden City and Tribunee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“atrazine-based PRE herbicide tank mixtures, dicamba + pendimethalin + sulfentrazone, and metribuzin + sulfentrazone when applied in the spring had excellent kochia control (85% to 95%) for 3 to 4 mo at the Garden City and Tribune sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“fallow fields (wheat–sorghum–fallow rotation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring dicamba + pendimethalin + sulfentrazone controlled kochia at 85% to 95%.

Treatment
dicamba + pendimethalin + sulfentrazonee0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae0weed
Outcome
kochia controle0
Direction
excellente0
Value
85% to 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dicamba + pendimethalin + sulfentrazone, and metribuzin + sulfentrazone when applied in the spring had excellent kochia control (85% to 95%) for 3 to 4 mo at the Garden City and Tribune sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“fallow fields (wheat–sorghum–fallow rotation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring metribuzin + sulfentrazone controlled kochia at 85% to 95%.

Treatment
metribuzin + sulfentrazonee0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae0weed
Outcome
kochia controle0
Direction
excellente0
Value
85% to 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metribuzin + sulfentrazone when applied in the spring had excellent kochia control (85% to 95%) for 3 to 4 mo at the Garden City and Tribune sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“fallow fields (wheat–sorghum–fallow rotation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–383 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall application of those mixtures did not exceed 79% kochia control at later dates.

Treatment
those PRE herbicide tank mixtures when applied in the falle0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae0weed
Outcome
kochia controle0
Direction
did not exceede0
Value
79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kochia control with those PRE herbicide tank mixtures when applied in the fall did not exceed 79% at the later evaluation dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1111 · show in text ↑
e1

“fallow fields (wheat–sorghum–fallow rotation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–383 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growers should apply effective PRE mixtures in early spring to manage the kochia seed bank.

Treatment
effective PRE herbicide tank mixturese0
Interactor
kochiaBassiae0weed
Outcome
manage kochia seed banke0
Setting
Central Great Plainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bassia
Bassia · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Felagund · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growers should utilize these effective PRE herbicide tank mixtures (multiple sites of action) in early spring to manage kochia seed bank during the summer fallow phase of this 3-yr crop rotation (wheat–corn/sorghum–fallow) in the Central Great Plains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1489 · show in text ↑

sulfentrazone · Bassia · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dicamba · Bassia · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · Bassia · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.