Abstract
Productivity of plants is determined by multiple factors that directly affect one another, therefore yield variability may be high and difficult to predict. Most often, how- ever, a lower crop yield is achieved in the no-tillage system than in the ploughing system. The reported study evaluated the yielding of pea under conventional (ploughing) tillage (shallow ploughing and harrowing after harvest of the previous crop, ploughing in the au- tumn), reduced tillage (only cultivator after harvest of the previous crop) and herbicide tillage (only Roundup 360 SL after harvest of the previous crop). The highest pea yield was achieved in the conventional tillage, whereas a lower one - by 40.8% - in the herbi- cide tillage. The conventional tillage system increased the number of pods per 1 m 2 , the number of grains per 1 m 2 , and grain weight per plant, compared to the herbicide tillage. The yield of pea was correlated with pod number per 1 m 2 , grain number per 1 m 2 , grain weight per plant, and plant number per 1 m 2 . Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m 2 and grain number per 1 m 2 , as well as between plant number per 1 m 2 and pod number per 1 m 2 , and between plant number per 1 m 2 and grain number per plant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave the highest pea yield, 40.8% above herbicide tillage.
- Taxon
- PEA
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- pea yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 40.8%e0
- Comparator
- herbi- cide tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“The highest pea yield was achieved in the conventional tillage, whereas a lower one - by 40.8% - in the herbi- cide tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage increased pod and grain number per square metre and grain weight per plant versus herbicide tillage.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- conventional tillage systeme0
- Outcome
- number of pods per 1 m 2 , the number of grains per 1 m 2 , and grain weight per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- herbicide tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“The conventional tillage system increased the number of pods per 1 m 2 , the number of grains per 1 m 2 , and grain weight per plant, compared to the herbicide tillage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea yield correlated with pod number, grain number, grain weight per plant and plant number per square metre.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- plante0
- Outcome
- yield of peae0
- Qualifier
- correlated with pod number per 1 m 2 , grain number per 1 m 2 , grain weight per plant, and plant number per 1 m 2e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“The yield of pea was correlated with pod number per 1 m 2 , grain number per 1 m 2 , grain weight per plant, and plant number per 1 m 2 .”
Claim · model-written summary
Pod number correlated with grain number per square metre.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- plante0
- Outcome
- pod number per 1 m 2e0
- Qualifier
- grain number per 1 m 2e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m 2 and grain number per 1 m 2 , as well as between plant number per 1 m 2 and pod number per 1 m 2 , and between plant number per 1 m 2 and grain number per plant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant number correlated with pod number per square metre.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- plante0
- Outcome
- plant number per 1 m 2e0
- Qualifier
- pod number per 1 m 2e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m 2 and grain number per 1 m 2 , as well as between plant number per 1 m 2 and pod number per 1 m 2 , and between plant number per 1 m 2 and grain number per plant.”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant number correlated with grain number per plant.
- Taxon
- PEALathyrus oleraceust0
- Organ / stage
- plante0
- Outcome
- plant number per 1 m 2e0
- Qualifier
- grain number per plante0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“PEA (Pisum sativum L.)”
e0“Correlations were also confirmed between pod number per 1 m 2 and grain number per 1 m 2 , as well as between plant number per 1 m 2 and pod number per 1 m 2 , and between plant number per 1 m 2 and grain number per plant.”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- positive
- positive
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.