Paper · 2011 · Czech Journal of Food Sciences

Quality of winter wheat in relation to heat and drought shock after anthesis

Krisztina Balla; Mariann Rakszegi; Zhongy Li; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
214
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Raw material quality, which is influenced not only by the protein content, insoluble protein polymers, and glutenin-to-gliadin ratio but also by the starch granule size, is very important for the quality of bakery products. This study investigated the effect of high temperature and drought (during grain-filling) on the quality and components yield of five winter wheat varieties. Drought and drought + heat were found to have a much greater influence on the yield and quality than heat stress alone. Averaged over the varieties, the yield losses were 57% after drought, 76% after drought + heat, and only 31% after heat stresses. The reductions in the unextractable polymeric protein fraction and glutenin-to-gliadin ratio indicated a poorer grain yield quality, despite the higher protein content. Quality deterioration was observed after drought or drought + heat, while high temperatures alone resulted in no change or in a better ratio of protein components. A significant negative correlation was observed between starch granule size and relative protein content after drought, demonstrating that this parameter contributes, together with protein, to the baking quality of the flour.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced winter wheat yield by 57% averaged over varieties.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“the yield losses were 57% after drought, 76% after drought + heat, and only 31% after heat stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drought and heat reduced winter wheat yield by 76% averaged over varieties.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought + heate0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“the yield losses were 57% after drought, 76% after drought + heat, and only 31% after heat stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress reduced winter wheat yield by 31% averaged over varieties.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
heat stressese0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0
Value
31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“the yield losses were 57% after drought, 76% after drought + heat, and only 31% after heat stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and combined drought and heat affected winter wheat yield and quality more than heat alone.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Drought and drought + heate0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0
Direction
much greater influencee0
Comparator
heat stress alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought and drought + heat were found to have a much greater influence on the yield and quality than heat stress alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought treatments reduced the unextractable polymeric protein fraction and glutenin-to-gliadin ratio in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
unextractable polymeric protein fraction and glutenin-to-gliadin ratioe0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“The reductions in the unextractable polymeric protein fraction and glutenin-to-gliadin ratio indicated a poorer grain yield quality, despite the higher protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–799 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat had higher protein content despite poorer grain quality under stress.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“a poorer grain yield quality, despite the higher protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought or combined drought and heat deteriorated winter wheat quality.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
drought or drought + heate0
Outcome
Qualitye0
Direction
deterioratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“Quality deterioration was observed after drought or drought + heat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat alone caused no change or improved the ratio of protein components in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high temperatures alonee0
Outcome
ratio of protein componentse0
Direction
no change or in a bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“high temperatures alone resulted in no change or in a better ratio of protein components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–963 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After drought, winter wheat starch granule size was negatively correlated with relative protein content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
starch granule sizee0
Direction
negative correlatione0
Qualifier
relative protein contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
e0

“A significant negative correlation was observed between starch granule size and relative protein content after drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1083 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

drought · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 4 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.