Paper · 2019 · Open Agriculture

Stimulation Effects of Foliar Applied Glycine and Glutamine Amino Acids on Lettuce Growth

Yaghoub Aghaye Noroozlo; Mohammad Kazem Souri; Mojtaba Delshad

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
152
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Amino acids have various roles in plant metabolism, and exogenous application of amino acids may have benefits and stimulation effects on plant growth and quality. In this study, the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine at different concentrations of 0 (as control), 250, 500 and 1000 mg.L -1 , as well as a treatment of 250 mg.L -1 glycine+250 mg.L -1 glutamine. The results showed that there was significant increase in leaf total chlorophyll content under Gly250+Glu250, Gly250 and Glu1000 mg.L -1 treatments, and in leaf carotenoids content under 250 mg.L -1 glutamine spray compared with the control plants. Shoot fresh and dry weights were highest under 500 mg.L -1 glycine, whereas root fresh weight was highest under 250 mg.L -1 glycine spray. Foliar application of glycine and glutamine had no significant increase in leaf mineral concentrations except for iron, in which 1000 mg.L -1 Gly spray resulted in significantly higher leaf Fe concentration compared with the control plants. Leaf vitamin C was increased at 250 and particularly 500 mg.L -1 spray of glycine and glutamine compared with the control. Nevertheless, different amino acid treatments had no significant effect on plant height, leaf SPAD value, root dry weight, and leaf concentrations of N, K, Ca, Mg and Zn. The results indicate that foliar application of glycine and glutamine amino acids can have beneficial effects on lettuce growth, as higher fresh yield, leaf chlorophyll content and vitamin C were obtained by low to moderate concentrations of glycine and/or glutamine amino acids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gly250+Glu250 foliar spray significantly increased leaf total chlorophyll content of lettuce compared with control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Gly250+Glu250e1
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll contente1
Direction
significant increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that there was significant increase in leaf total chlorophyll content under Gly250+Glu250, Gly250 and Glu1000 mg.L -1 treatments, and in leaf carotenoids content under 250 mg.L -1 glutamine spray compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gly250 foliar spray significantly increased leaf total chlorophyll content of lettuce compared with control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Gly250e1
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll contente1
Direction
significant increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that there was significant increase in leaf total chlorophyll content under Gly250+Glu250, Gly250 and Glu1000 mg.L -1 treatments, and in leaf carotenoids content under 250 mg.L -1 glutamine spray compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glu1000 foliar spray significantly increased leaf total chlorophyll content of lettuce compared with control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Glu1000e1
Outcome
leaf total chlorophyll contente1
Direction
significant increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that there was significant increase in leaf total chlorophyll content under Gly250+Glu250, Gly250 and Glu1000 mg.L -1 treatments, and in leaf carotenoids content under 250 mg.L -1 glutamine spray compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

250 mg/L glutamine spray significantly increased leaf carotenoid content of lettuce compared with control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
250 mg.L -1 glutamine spraye1
Outcome
leaf carotenoids contente1
Direction
significant increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that there was significant increase in leaf total chlorophyll content under Gly250+Glu250, Gly250 and Glu1000 mg.L -1 treatments, and in leaf carotenoids content under 250 mg.L -1 glutamine spray compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 mg/L glycine spray gave the highest shoot fresh and dry weights of lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
500 mg.L -1 glycinee2
Outcome
Shoot fresh and dry weightse2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shoot fresh and dry weights were highest under 500 mg.L -1 glycine, whereas root fresh weight was highest under 250 mg.L -1 glycine spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

250 mg/L glycine spray gave the highest root fresh weight of lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
250 mg.L -1 glycine spraye2
Outcome
root fresh weighte2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shoot fresh and dry weights were highest under 500 mg.L -1 glycine, whereas root fresh weight was highest under 250 mg.L -1 glycine spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

1000 mg/L glycine spray significantly increased leaf Fe concentration compared with control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
1000 mg.L -1 Gly spraye3
Outcome
leaf Fe concentratione3
Direction
significantly highere3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar application of glycine and glutamine had no significant increase in leaf mineral concentrations except for iron, in which 1000 mg.L -1 Gly spray resulted in significantly higher leaf Fe concentration compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar glycine and glutamine did not significantly increase leaf mineral concentrations, except iron.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Foliar application of glycine and glutaminee3
Outcome
leaf mineral concentrationse3
Direction
no significant increasee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e3

“Foliar application of glycine and glutamine had no significant increase in leaf mineral concentrations except for iron, in which 1000 mg.L -1 Gly spray resulted in significantly higher leaf Fe concentration compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycine and glutamine sprays at 250 and 500 mg/L increased leaf vitamin C compared with control.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
250 and particularly 500 mg.L -1 spray of glycine and glutaminee4
Outcome
Leaf vitamin Ce4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e4

“Leaf vitamin C was increased at 250 and particularly 500 mg.L -1 spray of glycine and glutamine compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid treatments had no significant effect on plant height, leaf SPAD value or root dry weight of lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
different amino acid treatmentse5
Outcome
plant height, leaf SPAD value, root dry weighte5
Direction
no significant effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e5

“different amino acid treatments had no significant effect on plant height, leaf SPAD value, root dry weight, and leaf concentrations of N, K, Ca, Mg and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid treatments had no significant effect on leaf N, K and Ca concentrations of lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
different amino acid treatmentse5
Outcome
leaf concentrations of N, K, Cae5
Direction
no significant effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e5

“different amino acid treatments had no significant effect on plant height, leaf SPAD value, root dry weight, and leaf concentrations of N, K, Ca, Mg and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid treatments had no significant effect on leaf Mg and Zn concentrations of lettuce.

Taxon
Lactuca sativa subvar SaharaLactuca sativae0
Treatment
different amino acid treatmentse5
Outcome
Mg and Zne5
Direction
no significant effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and nutrient uptake of Romain lettuce ( Lactuca sativa subvar Sahara ) were evaluated under spray of glycine or glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–320 · show in text ↑
e5

“different amino acid treatments had no significant effect on plant height, leaf SPAD value, root dry weight, and leaf concentrations of N, K, Ca, Mg and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1386 · show in text ↑

glycine · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glycine · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

amino acid · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

glycine · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 64 positive, 8 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.