Paper · 2013

Nut production in response to thinning and fertilization for planted walnut

Felix Ponder; Steve Rutledge; J. W. Van Sambeek

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nut production from nursery-run black walnuts grown on 225 acres at the Hammons Products Company's Sho-Neff Black Walnut Farm in Stockton, MO, was evaluated from 1995 to 2010 to determine if nut production increased after thinning and fertilization in 2001. The farm consists of 11 upland and 10 bottomland plantings on sites ranging from unsuitable to well suited for growth of walnut. All 21 stands were thinned in 2001, removing about one-third of the trees, and fertilized with 60, 20, and 60 pounds per acre of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, respectively. Nine stands were limed to raise pH to 5.5 or higher. Five stands received an additional spring and fall application of nitrogen. Milled walnut shells and husk waste were periodically applied to 11 stands. Hay was harvested between rows 40 feet apart both before and after thinning and fertilization. Nut production increased on average 20 pounds per acre with one-third fewer trees over the 9-year post-treatment period compared to the 7-year pretreatment period. The modest gain in nut production suggests that competition between trees and low soil nutrients were not the major factors limiting nut production. These results cause us to wonder: can a grower expect early economic returns from nut production on an investment made in the culture of young black walnut from nursery-run or unimproved seedlings?

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nut production rose on average 20 pounds per acre after thinning and fertilization, despite one-third fewer trees.

Taxon
black walnutsJuglans nigrat0
Treatment
thinning and fertilizationt1
Outcome
Nut productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 pounds per acree0
Qualifier
one-third fewer treese0
Comparator
7-year pretreatment periode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juglans nigra
Juglans nigra · TaxonPhoto by and (c)2007 Derek Ramsey ( Ram-Man ). Location credit to the Chanticleer Garden. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nut production increased on average 20 pounds per acre with one-third fewer trees over the 9-year post-treatment period compared to the 7-year pretreatment period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“black walnuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑
t1

“thinning and fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–56 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The modest production gain suggests tree competition and low soil nutrients were not the main limits on nut output.

Taxon
black walnutsJuglans nigrat0
Outcome
nut productione0
Qualifier
competition between trees and low soil nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Juglans nigra
Juglans nigra · TaxonPhoto by and (c)2007 Derek Ramsey ( Ram-Man ). Location credit to the Chanticleer Garden. · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The modest gain in nut production suggests that competition between trees and low soil nutrients were not the major factors limiting nut production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“black walnuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–45 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Juglans nigra (black walnut)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.