Paper · 2019 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of Nano-Fertilizer and N-Fertilization Levels on Produc-tivity of Egyptian cotton under Different Sowing Dates

M. Emara; S. Hamoda; Maha Hamad

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out on clay soil in El-Gemmeiza Agric. Res. St., ARC, El-Gharbiya Governorate, during 2016 and 2017 to study the effect of nanofertilizer and N-fertilization levels on productivity of cotton Giza 86 under two sowing dates. The experiment design was a split split-plot. The main plots involved two sowing dates; (Early at 8th April and Late at 8th May). While, the sub plots were allocated to three treatment of nanofertilizer (without, Lithovit 2.5g/L and Lithovit 5g/L). Application three times (at squaring,initiation of flowering and two weeks after flowering). While, the sub sub-plots were allocated to three N-fertilization levels, (50%, 75% and 100% recommended dose). The most importantresults obtained could be summarized as follows: Sowing date had a significant effect on growth, yield and its omponents. Where, the early sowing date surpassed the late sowing date. The levels of N had significant effect on growth, seed cotton yield and its components in both seasons. The rate of N (75%) gave the good averages in this respect. The Nano-fertilizer by Lithovit had significant effect on growth, seed cotton yield and it compounds. All treatments had a not significant effect on fiber properties. Early sowing date in combination with the N fertilizer (45kg N/fad) and foliar application with Lithovit (5g/L water) for obtaining gave the high productivity of Egyptian cotton variety Giza 86.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing significantly surpassed late sowing in cotton growth, yield and yield components.

Material
Giza 86e1
Treatment
early sowing datee0
Outcome
growth, yield and its omponentse0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
late sowing datee0
Setting
El-Gemmeiza Agric. Res. St., ARC, El-Gharbiya Governoratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing date had a significant effect on growth, yield and its omponents. Where, the early sowing date surpassed the late sowing date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–911 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of cotton Giza 86 under two sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–256 · show in text ↑
e2

“El-Gemmeiza Agric. Res. St., ARC, El-Gharbiya Governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 55–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels significantly affected cotton growth, seed cotton yield and components in both seasons.

Material
Giza 86e1
Treatment
levels of Ne0
Outcome
growth, seed cotton yield and its componentse0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of N had significant effect on growth, seed cotton yield and its components in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of cotton Giza 86 under two sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% nitrogen rate gave good averages for growth and seed cotton yield and components.

Material
Giza 86e1
Treatment
rate of N (75%)e0
Outcome
growth, seed cotton yield and its componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of N had significant effect on growth, seed cotton yield and its components in both seasons. The rate of N (75%) gave the good averages in this respect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of cotton Giza 86 under two sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lithovit nanofertilizer significantly affected growth, seed cotton yield and its components.

Material
Giza 86e1
Treatment
Nano-fertilizer by Lithovite0
Outcome
growth, seed cotton yield and it compoundse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Nano-fertilizer by Lithovit had significant effect on growth, seed cotton yield and it compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1177 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of cotton Giza 86 under two sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments did not significantly affect cotton fibre properties.

Material
Giza 86e1
Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
fiber propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments had a not significant effect on fiber properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“productivity of cotton Giza 86 under two sowing dates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing with 45kg N/fad and Lithovit at 5g/L water gave high productivity of Giza 86 cotton.

Taxon
Egyptian cottonGossypium barbadensee0
Material
Giza 86e0
Treatment
Early sowing date in combination with the N fertilizer (45kg N/fad) and foliar application with Lithovit (5g/L water)e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early sowing date in combination with the N fertilizer (45kg N/fad) and foliar application with Lithovit (5g/L water) for obtaining gave the high productivity of Egyptian cotton variety Giza 86.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1437 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

sowing time · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 66 positive, 29 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.