Paper · 2019 · Irrigation and Drainage

Deficit Irrigation Scheduling and Superabsorbent Polymer‐ Hydrogel Enhance Seed Yield, Water Productivity and Economics of Indian Mustard Under Semi‐Arid Ecologies

S.S. Rathore; Kapila Shekhawat; Anchal Dass; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Oilseed brassicas are extensively grown in the water‐stressed ecologies of India. Sufficient irrigation, deficit irrigation scheduling (DIS) with limited irrigation water and rainfed (no irrigation) conditions were assessed with and without the use of superabsorbent polymer‐hydrogel (SAP‐hydrogel) under a micro‐sprinkler irrigation system (MIS) for Indian mustard. Irrigation scheduling at an irrigation water/cumulative pan evaporation ratio (IW/CPE) of 0.8, 0.6 and 0.4, along with use of SAP‐hydrogel, produced almost equal dry matter per plant (113, 115 and 109 g plant −1 ), which was, however, significantly higher ( P ≤ 0.05) over rainfed (86 g plant −1 ). The seed yield under DIS (0.6 IW/CPE) increased by 39.3% over rainfed + hydrogel (HG). Also, the seed yield obtained under irrigation scheduling at a ratio of 0.4 IW/CPE was found to be similar to that obtained in rainfed + HG treatment. A similar water productivity (WP) of 10 kg ha −1 mm −1 was obtained with DIS at 0.4 IW/CPE + HG and at 0.8 IW/CPE‐HG; however, a higher total water productivity (WP t ) was recorded under DIS at 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE + HG (23 and 29 kg ha −1 mm −1 , respectively) over the same irrigation schedules excluding HG. The economics of HG application under DIS was better due to higher net returns, although the highest B : C ratio (1.92) was recorded in DIS (0.4 IW/CPE), trailed by irrigation scheduling at IW/CPE 0.8 and 0.6. Overall, it could be concluded that DIS through micro‐sprinkler and use of HG enhanced seed, oil, water productivity and energy dynamics under water‐constrained conditions in semi‐arid ecologies. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.8 IW/CPE with hydrogel produced 113 g plant −1 dry matter.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
0.8e0
Outcome
dry matter per plante0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
113e0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation scheduling at an irrigation water/cumulative pan evaporation ratio (IW/CPE) of 0.8, 0.6 and 0.4, along with use of SAP‐hydrogel, produced almost equal dry matter per plant (113, 115 and 109 g plant −1 ), which was, however, significantly higher ( P ≤ 0.05) over rainfed (86 g plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE with hydrogel produced 115 g plant −1 dry matter.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
0.6e0
Outcome
dry matter per plante0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
115e0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation scheduling at an irrigation water/cumulative pan evaporation ratio (IW/CPE) of 0.8, 0.6 and 0.4, along with use of SAP‐hydrogel, produced almost equal dry matter per plant (113, 115 and 109 g plant −1 ), which was, however, significantly higher ( P ≤ 0.05) over rainfed (86 g plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE with hydrogel produced 109 g plant −1 dry matter.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
0.4e0
Outcome
dry matter per plante0
Direction
significantly highere0
Value
109e0
Comparator
rainfede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation scheduling at an irrigation water/cumulative pan evaporation ratio (IW/CPE) of 0.8, 0.6 and 0.4, along with use of SAP‐hydrogel, produced almost equal dry matter per plant (113, 115 and 109 g plant −1 ), which was, however, significantly higher ( P ≤ 0.05) over rainfed (86 g plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE raised seed yield by 39.3% over rainfed plus hydrogel.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
DIS (0.6 IW/CPE)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.3%e0
Comparator
rainfed + hydrogel (HG)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The seed yield under DIS (0.6 IW/CPE) increased by 39.3% over rainfed + hydrogel (HG).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield under 0.4 IW/CPE was similar to rainfed plus hydrogel.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
irrigation scheduling at a ratio of 0.4 IW/CPEe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
rainfed + HG treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seed yield obtained under irrigation scheduling at a ratio of 0.4 IW/CPE was found to be similar to that obtained in rainfed + HG treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity was 10 kg ha −1 mm −1 under deficit irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE with hydrogel.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
DIS at 0.4 IW/CPE + HGe0
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e0
Direction
similare0
Value
10 kg ha −1 mm −1e0
Comparator
0.8 IW/CPE‐HGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar water productivity (WP) of 10 kg ha −1 mm −1 was obtained with DIS at 0.4 IW/CPE + HG and at 0.8 IW/CPE‐HG;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total water productivity reached 23 kg ha −1 mm −1 at 0.6 IW/CPE with hydrogel, above without hydrogel.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
0.6e0
Outcome
total water productivity (WP t )e0
Direction
highere0
Value
23e0
Comparator
the same irrigation schedules excluding HGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher total water productivity (WP t ) was recorded under DIS at 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE + HG (23 and 29 kg ha −1 mm −1 , respectively) over the same irrigation schedules excluding HG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total water productivity reached 29 kg ha −1 mm −1 at 0.4 IW/CPE with hydrogel, above without hydrogel.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
0.4e0
Outcome
total water productivity (WP t )e0
Direction
highere0
Value
29e0
Comparator
the same irrigation schedules excluding HGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher total water productivity (WP t ) was recorded under DIS at 0.6 and 0.4 IW/CPE + HG (23 and 29 kg ha −1 mm −1 , respectively) over the same irrigation schedules excluding HG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel improved economic returns under deficit irrigation.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
HG application under DISe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The economics of HG application under DIS was better due to higher net returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest benefit-cost ratio was 1.92 under deficit irrigation at 0.4 IW/CPE.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
DIS (0.4 IW/CPE)e0
Outcome
B : C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.92e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest B : C ratio (1.92) was recorded in DIS (0.4 IW/CPE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded deficit irrigation and hydrogel improved seed, oil, water productivity and energy dynamics.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Outcome
DIS through micro‐sprinkler and use of HGe0
Qualifier
under water‐constrained conditions in semi‐arid ecologiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, it could be concluded that DIS through micro‐sprinkler and use of HG enhanced seed, oil, water productivity and energy dynamics under water‐constrained conditions in semi‐arid ecologies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1628 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian Mustard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–137 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 47 positive, 2 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

other · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.