Paper · 2018 · Crop and Pasture Science

Crop responses to subsoil manuring. I. Results in south-western Victoria from 2009 to 2012

Peter W. Sale; Jaikirat S. Gill; Renick R. Peries; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Subsoil manuring is a practice that involves placing high rates of organic amendments in bands at the base of rip-lines that extend down into the subsoil to a depth of 30–40 cm, in order to ameliorate poorly structured clay subsoils. The objective of this study was to determine whether the increases in crop yield from this practice, which occurred at one site in the high-rainfall zone in Victoria from 2005 to 2007, would occur at other sites and in other seasons in south-western Victoria. On-farm field experiments were therefore carried out at three sites in south-western Victoria between 2009 and 2012 to measure the yield responses to subsoil manuring. The study found that subsoil manuring with poultry litter resulted in consistent and recurring increases in estimated grain yield at these sites, with responses occurring with consecutive crops. Increases in estimated grain yield continued for 4 years, with average increases in hand-harvested yield of 3.5 t ha–1 for wheat, 1.6 t ha–1 for canola and 2.3 t ha–1 for faba beans. The estimated increases in grain yield were frequently associated with the increased extraction of deep subsoil water after anthesis. A treatment involving deep-banded nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilisers and additional in-crop N, which matched the N and P in the poultry litter, yielded less than the full rate of subsoil manuring in seven of the eight site-years. This suggests that yield responses from subsoil manuring were not solely due to the release of N and P from the deep-banded poultry litter.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry litter subsoil manuring repeatedly increased estimated grain yield across consecutive crops.

Taxon
Cropt0
Treatment
subsoil manuring with poultry littere0
Outcome
estimated grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“subsoil manuring with poultry litter resulted in consistent and recurring increases in estimated grain yield at these sites, with responses occurring with consecutive crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat hand-harvested yield increased by an average 3.5 t ha–1 over four years.

Treatment
subsoil manuring with poultry littere1
Outcome
hand-harvested yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
3.5 t ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in estimated grain yield continued for 4 years, with average increases in hand-harvested yield of 3.5 t ha–1 for wheat, 1.6 t ha–1 for canola and 2.3 t ha–1 for faba beans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil manuring with poultry litter resulted in consistent and recurring increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola hand-harvested yield increased by an average 1.6 t ha–1 over four years.

Treatment
subsoil manuring with poultry littere1
Outcome
hand-harvested yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
1.6 t ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in estimated grain yield continued for 4 years, with average increases in hand-harvested yield of 3.5 t ha–1 for wheat, 1.6 t ha–1 for canola and 2.3 t ha–1 for faba beans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil manuring with poultry litter resulted in consistent and recurring increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean hand-harvested yield increased by an average 2.3 t ha–1 over four years.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae0
Treatment
subsoil manuring with poultry littere1
Outcome
hand-harvested yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.3 t ha–1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increases in estimated grain yield continued for 4 years, with average increases in hand-harvested yield of 3.5 t ha–1 for wheat, 1.6 t ha–1 for canola and 2.3 t ha–1 for faba beans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“subsoil manuring with poultry litter resulted in consistent and recurring increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–766 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater grain yield was frequently associated with greater deep subsoil water extraction after anthesis.

Taxon
Cropt0
Organ / stage
anthesise0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
frequently associated with the increased extraction of deep subsoil water after anthesise0

Verbatim

e0

“The estimated increases in grain yield were frequently associated with the increased extraction of deep subsoil water after anthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1173 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matched deep-banded nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer yielded less than full-rate subsoil manuring in seven of eight site-years.

Taxon
Cropt0
Treatment
deep-banded nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilisers and additional in-crop Ne0
Outcome
yielded lesse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
seven of the eight site-yearse0
Comparator
full rate of subsoil manuringe0

Verbatim

e0

“A treatment involving deep-banded nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilisers and additional in-crop N, which matched the N and P in the poultry litter, yielded less than the full rate of subsoil manuring in seven of the eight site-years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield responses were not solely attributable to nitrogen and phosphorus release from deep-banded poultry litter.

Taxon
Cropt0
Outcome
yield responsese0
Qualifier
not solely due to the release of N and P from the deep-banded poultry littere0

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests that yield responses from subsoil manuring were not solely due to the release of N and P from the deep-banded poultry litter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

tillage · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 42 positive, 8 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

336 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.