Paper · 2000 · International Journal of Horticultural Science

What mechanisms are involved in cabbage-clover intercropping and a further proof of the 'host plant quality' hypothesis

Z. Seress; R. G. McKinlay; B. Pénzes; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Over 10 years of field trials show reductions of most of the pests in Brassicas undersown by clover. The pest-reducing effects are due to the 'appropriate / inappropriate landings' hypothesis (Finch, 1996), and the 'host plant quality' hypothesis (Theunissen, 1994). To find out the mechanisms within the 'host plant quality' hypothesis in the most promising intercropping (collards undersown by clover) glasshouse experiments were conducted to see whether intercropping influences the mean relative growth rate, fecundity and time of maturity of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae) a common pest of Brassicas. The treatment modelling intercropping showed the smallest mean relative growth rate, delayed the maturity and slowed down the growth of cabbages. The treatment modelling monocropping showed the highest mean relative growth rate and the maturity was reached earlier. These results may indicate that intercropping delays the growth of settled aphid populations, giving another proof that in the case of clover undersown cabbages the 'host plant quality' hypothesis is likely to be acting. The differences between treatments where the roots of clover and cabbages were separated and allowed to grow together suggest that the effect is via the roots by competition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clover undersowing reduced most Brassica pests.

Taxon
BrassicasBrassicae0
Treatment
undersown by clovere0
Interactor
cloverTrifoliume0weed
Outcome
most of the pestse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium
Trifolium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field trials show reductions of most of the pests in Brassicas undersown by clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping model gave the smallest aphid relative growth rate.

Treatment
modelling intercroppinge0
Interactor
cloverTrifoliumt1weed
Outcome
mean relative growth ratee0
Direction
smalleste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trifolium
Trifolium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment modelling intercropping showed the smallest mean relative growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
t1

“clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping model delayed aphid maturity.

Treatment
intercroppingt0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delayed the maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage-clover intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercropping model slowed cabbage growth.

Treatment
intercroppingt0
Outcome
growth of cabbagese0
Direction
slowed downe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slowed down the growth of cabbages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–766 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage-clover intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The monocropping model gave the highest aphid growth rate.

Treatment
modelling monocroppinge0
Outcome
mean relative growth ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment modelling monocropping showed the highest mean relative growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The monocropping model led to earlier aphid maturity.

Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maturity was reached earlier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred root competition as the likely mechanism.

Outcome
effecte0
Qualifier
via the roots by competitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect is via the roots by competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“cabbage-clover intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60 · show in text ↑

intercropping · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

intercropping · phenology · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.