Paper · 2018 · Tree Physiology

Moderate water stress does not inhibit nitrogen remobilization, allowing fast growth in high nitrogen content Quercus variabilis seedlings under dry conditions

Jiaxi Wang; Pedro Villar-Salvador; Guolei Li; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Remobilization of stored nitrogen (N) plays an important role in the early growth of deciduous trees in spring. Several environmental factors can modulate N remobilization, but whether water stress is one such factors is unknown. This study analyzes how the size of N storage in Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings interacts with water stress to affect N remobilization, uptake and new growth. This information is important for improving success of forest tree plantations under dry spring conditions. During the first growing season, we produced seedlings with distinct N content by applying two fall N fertilization rates (12 or 24 mg N per seedling) using 15N-enriched fertilizer. At the beginning of the second growing season, a new experiment was started where seedlings were transplanted into larger pots and subjected to two watering levels (85 or 40% of field capacity). The plants were sampled at 4 weeks (T1), 8 weeks (T2) and 12 weeks (T3) after transplanting. Low watering reduced the growth of high and low N seedlings, but high N seedlings showed greater growth than low N seedlings. During bud burst and initial shoot elongation (T1), restricted watering, which induced a moderate water stress, did not affect the amount of N remobilized from roots, the major source of stored N source at this growth stage. This suggests that high N storage can partially counteract the negative effect of moderate water stress on early growth. At T1, water stress did not affect N uptake, and high N content seedlings absorbed significantly less soil N than did low N content seedlings. At T3, in contrast, water stress was the main determinant for N uptake, with drought-stressed plants showing lower uptake than well-watered plants. We conclude that moderate drought does not inhibit N remobilization from the major storage organ at early growth stages in spring, and that increasing N storage of planted seedlings through fall fertilization can mitigate the negative effect of moderate spring drought on growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low watering reduced growth in both high and low nitrogen seedlings.

Taxon
Quercus variabilis BlumeQuercus variabilise1
Treatment
Low wateringe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low watering reduced the growth of high and low N seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1030 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen seedlings grew more than low nitrogen seedlings.

Taxon
Quercus variabilis BlumeQuercus variabilise1
Treatment
high N seedlingse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
low N seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high N seedlings showed greater growth than low N seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Restricted watering did not affect nitrogen remobilization from roots during bud burst and initial shoot elongation.

Taxon
Quercus variabilis BlumeQuercus variabilise1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
restricted wateringe0
Outcome
amount of N remobilized from rootse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
During bud burst and initial shoot elongation (T1)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During bud burst and initial shoot elongation (T1), restricted watering, which induced a moderate water stress, did not affect the amount of N remobilized from roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T1, water stress did not affect nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
Quercus variabilis BlumeQuercus variabilise1
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
At T1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At T1, water stress did not affect N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1486 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At T1, high nitrogen seedlings absorbed significantly less soil nitrogen than low nitrogen seedlings.

Taxon
Quercus variabilis BlumeQuercus variabilise1
Treatment
high N content seedlingse0
Outcome
soil Ne0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
low N content seedlingse0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high N content seedlings absorbed significantly less soil N than did low N content seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1584 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At T3, drought stressed plants had lower nitrogen uptake than well watered plants.

Taxon
Quercus variabilis BlumeQuercus variabilise1
Treatment
drought-stressed plantse0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
At T3e0
Comparator
well-watered plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At T3, in contrast, water stress was the main determinant for N uptake, with drought-stressed plants showing lower uptake than well-watered plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1733 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–313 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that fall nitrogen fertilization to increase stored nitrogen can mitigate moderate spring drought effects on growth.

Taxon
Quercus variabilis BlumeQuercus variabilise1
Treatment
fall fertilizatione0
Outcome
mitigate the negative effect of moderate spring drought on growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus variabilis
Quercus variabilis · TaxonVelela · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing N storage of planted seedlings through fall fertilization can mitigate the negative effect of moderate spring drought on growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2012 · show in text ↑
e1

“Quercus variabilis Blume seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–313 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: content · Quercus variabilisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.