Abstract
Rockwool is an inert growing media popular in the hydroponics industry. Eventually the rockwool fills with plant material and must be replaced and the residuals are disposed. Composting of this material will conserve landfill space. Although the rockwool itself is stable, roots and other plant materials remaining after harvest can decompose. We studied the effect of composting greenwaste feedstock mixed with spent rockwool in the amount of 10% volume on plant growth. A greenhouse experiment was conducted with two types of soils: sandy loam and clay, each with and without rockwool, and applied at rates 0, 25, 50, and 100 t ha−1 to pots which were then seeded with okra, tomato, or chili pepper. Results indicate that plant growth of all three crops was unaffected by the presence of (10% volume) spent rockwool in the compost. In all cases, increase in application rate of compost enhanced plant growth significantly. While the growth of tomato was unaffected by soil type, shoot weights of okra and chili pepper plants were significantly lower in sandy soil compared to clay loam soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Spent rockwool in compost did not affect okra growth.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- (10% volume) spent rockwool in the composte0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“plant growth of all three crops was unaffected by the presence of (10% volume) spent rockwool in the compost.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Spent rockwool in compost did not affect tomato growth.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- (10% volume) spent rockwool in the composte0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“plant growth of all three crops was unaffected by the presence of (10% volume) spent rockwool in the compost.”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Spent rockwool in compost did not affect chili pepper growth.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“plant growth of all three crops was unaffected by the presence of (10% volume) spent rockwool in the compost.”
t0“Chili Peppers”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing compost application rate significantly enhanced growth of all three crops.
- Taxon
- Okra, Tomato, and Chili Peppers
Solanum lycopersicum
Capsicum
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- increase in application rate of composte0
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“In all cases, increase in application rate of compost enhanced plant growth significantly.”
t0“Okra, Tomato, and Chili Peppers”
Claim · model-written summary
Tomato growth was unaffected by soil type.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- growth of tomatoe0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
- Setting
- soil typee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the growth of tomato was unaffected by soil type”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Okra shoot weight was significantly lower in sandy soil than clay loam soil.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- sandy soile0
- Outcome
- shoot weightse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- clay loam soile0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“shoot weights of okra and chili pepper plants were significantly lower in sandy soil compared to clay loam soil.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chili pepper shoot weight was significantly lower in sandy soil than clay loam soil.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“shoot weights of okra and chili pepper plants were significantly lower in sandy soil compared to clay loam soil.”
The same questions in other papers
growing medium · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →growing medium · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →fertilization · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
91 papers more in this group
See all 95 papers →growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
165 papers more in this group
See all 169 papers →fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
203 papers more in this group
See all 207 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.