Paper · 2018 · Pest Management Science

Mixed effects of landscape complexity and insecticide use on ladybeetle abundance in wheat fields

Long Yang; Qian Zhang; Bing Liu; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the abundance of insect natural enemies in crop fields may be influenced by the surrounding landscape and local field management, particularly insecticide use at the local scale, few studies have examined these factors simultaneously. In this study, we investigated the effects of landscape context and insecticide use in local fields on ladybeetle abundance in wheat fields in northern China. RESULTS: Woodlots and fallow land were the most important landscape variables enhancing ladybeetle abundance. We used the cumulative percentage of these land types to characterize landscape complexity. Comparing the change in ladybeetle abundance in wheat fields within different landscapes and with different in-field insecticide regimes, we found that although more complex landscapes enhanced ladybeetle abundance, the negative effects of insecticide use on ladybeetle populations were not offset by landscape complexity. Additionally, the positive effects of more complex landscapes on ladybeetle abundance were not significant in wheat fields subjected to high insecticide use. CONCLUSION: Ladybeetle abundance is enhanced by landscape complexity, but this is modified by insecticide use in local fields. Within-field efforts to maximize the conservation biological control of pests to improve crop yield should take into account the influence of the surrounding landscape. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Woodlots enhanced ladybeetle abundance.

Interactor
ladybeetlee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
ladybeetle abundancee0
Direction
enhancinge0
Setting
Woodlotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Woodlots and fallow land were the most important landscape variables enhancing ladybeetle abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–523 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow land enhanced ladybeetle abundance.

Interactor
ladybeetlee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
ladybeetle abundancee0
Direction
enhancinge0
Setting
fallow lande0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Woodlots and fallow land were the most important landscape variables enhancing ladybeetle abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide use reduced ladybeetle populations despite landscape complexity.

Treatment
insecticide usee1
Interactor
ladybeetlee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
ladybeetle populationse1
Direction
negative effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ladybeetle abundance in wheat fields within different landscapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“the negative effects of insecticide use on ladybeetle populations were not offset by landscape complexity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–938 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive landscape association was nonsignificant under high insecticide use.

Treatment
high insecticide usee0
Interactor
ladybeetlee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
ladybeetle abundancee1
Direction
positive effectse1
Setting
more complex landscapese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat fields subjected to high insecticide use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“the positive effects of more complex landscapes on ladybeetle abundance were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1046 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation biocontrol efforts should account for the surrounding landscape.

Outcome
take into account the influence of the surrounding landscapee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insecticide use in local fields on ladybeetle abundance in wheat fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–395 · show in text ↑
e1

“Within-field efforts to maximize the conservation biological control of pests to improve crop yield should take into account the influence of the surrounding landscape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1392 · show in text ↑

insecticide · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.