Paper · 2017 · Agriculture (Pol nohospodárstvo)

Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Chemical Constituents in Cotton/Alfalfa Mixed Culture

Mazen Ibrahim

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract A pot experiment was conducted to study the extent of changes occurring in the nutrients, chlorophyll and protein of plants grown in cotton/alfalfa mixed culture as affected by inoculation with indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The experiment consisted of mycorrhizal treatments (with and without AMF inoculation) and three planting patterns (cotton monoculture, alfalfa monoculture, cotton/alfalfa mixed culture). Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) inoculum previously isolated from a rhizospheric soil of cotton, was a mixture of Glomus intraradices , G. viscosum , and G. mosseae . Results showed that total chlorophyll and protein concentrations, and nutrients content were higher in AM cotton plants compared with the non-AM control. Mixed culture had a positive effect on all the above parameters in cotton shoot. The highest values were noted in AM plants in the mixed culture. Improved chemicals and biochemical constituents in cotton led to an increase in dry matter production. The highest dry matter was observed in the AM mixed culture, and was significantly higher by 1.4 times than that of non-AM monoculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM cotton had higher chlorophyll, protein and nutrient content than non-AM cotton.

Treatment
AMe0
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungit0symbiont
Outcome
total chlorophyll and protein concentrations, and nutrients contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non-AM controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll and protein concentrations, and nutrients content were higher in AM cotton plants compared with the non-AM control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed culture positively affected cotton shoot chlorophyll, protein and nutrients.

Organ / stage
cotton shoote0
Treatment
Mixed culturee0
Outcome
all the above parameterse0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mixed culture had a positive effect on all the above parameters in cotton shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–833 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AM cotton in mixed culture had the highest chemical and biochemical values.

Treatment
AM plants in the mixed culturee0
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungit0symbiont
Outcome
highest valuese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values were noted in AM plants in the mixed culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Chemical Constituents in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved cotton chemical and biochemical constituents led to increased dry matter production.

Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
Improved chemicals and biochemical constituentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Improved chemicals and biochemical constituents in cotton led to an increase in dry matter production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM mixed culture produced the highest dry matter, 1.4 times non-AM monoculture.

Treatment
AM mixed culturee0
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungit0symbiont
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.4 timese0
Comparator
non-AM monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest dry matter was observed in the AM mixed culture, and was significantly higher by 1.4 times than that of non-AM monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Chemical Constituents in Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–73 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: pigments · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.