Paper · 2018 · Acta Horticulturae

Absorption of foliar applied micronutrients by apple leaves

G. Kurešová; A. Neumannová; P. Svoboda

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Foliar fertilization is used to correct nutritional deficiencies in plants. Nutrient concentration and combinations of elements are important for the use and efficiency of fertilizers. The aim of the experiment was to investigate how nutrients, in the form of one-component solutions, are absorbed by leaves and how the combination of multiple elements in the solution affect nutrient uptake. The experiment was carried out on the 20-year-old apple tree 'Selena', in the beginning of August 2016, in the experimental orchard of Crop Research Institute in Prague - Ruzyně. Defined solutions of micronutrients (Fe, Zn, Mn, B) and their mixture were applied in spots (5 μL by micropipette) on marked leaves of apple trees in the orchard. Leaves (4 repetitions, 12 leaves in each variant) were harvested, washed and analyzed five days after application. The increase of studied nutrients concentration in a leaf depended on the concentration of the applied solution. An observed higher content of the nutrients in leaf petioles indicates transport of applied nutrients (including slowly - moving Mn and Fe) from leaves to another place of consumption. Zinc showed the best absorption among the observed elements. Nutrient combination (application of all tested nutrients in one solution) positively influenced the iron intake. Foliar application of investigated elements increased their concentration in leaves from low to optimum levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nutrient concentration increased depending on applied solution concentration.

Treatment
concentration of the applied solutione0
Outcome
nutrients concentration in a leafe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of studied nutrients concentration in a leaf depended on the concentration of the applied solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nutrient content in petioles indicated transport from leaves.

Organ / stage
leaf petiolese0
Outcome
transport of applied nutrientse0
Qualifier
including slowly - moving Mn and Fee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An observed higher content of the nutrients in leaf petioles indicates transport of applied nutrients (including slowly - moving Mn and Fe) from leaves to another place of consumption.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc had the best absorption among tested elements.

Outcome
Zinc showed the best absorptione0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
observed elementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc showed the best absorption among the observed elements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining tested nutrients increased iron intake.

Treatment
application of all tested nutrients in one solutione0
Outcome
iron intakee0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient combination (application of all tested nutrients in one solution) positively influenced the iron intake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application increased leaf element concentrations from low to optimum levels.

Treatment
Foliar application of investigated elementse0
Outcome
their concentration in leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
optimum levelse0
Comparator
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of investigated elements increased their concentration in leaves from low to optimum levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–59 · show in text ↑

application · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 47 positive, 14 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.