Paper · 2023 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Agar-agar a promising edible coating agent for management of postharvest diseases and improving banana fruit quality

El Sayed Hussein Ziedan; Hassan Mohamed El Zahaby; Hanafey Farouk Maswada; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This study was executed to investigate the potential of agar-agar, a nontoxic and non-degradable gelling agent, as a promising coating agent to improve and protect banana fruit against fungal postharvest diseases i.e., crown, finger, neck and flower end rots which are caused by fungal isolates of Colletotrichum musae and Fusarium moniliforme. Coated-ba-nana fruit samples with different concentrations of agar-agar suspension particularly at 2.0 g · l−1 exhibited a significant reduction in incidence and severity of postharvest diseases compared to untreated fruit. Banana fruits dipped in agar suspension at 2.0 g · l−1 for 5, 10 and 15 min showed significant reduction in disease incidence and severity. Moreover, application of agar suspension as a coating agent at 2.0 g · l−1 significantly decreased weight loss (%), firmness loss (%), and soluble solid concentration of banana fruit for 15 days at 25 ± 2°C. Scanning electron microscopy observation confirmed that the fruit coated with agar colloid at 2.0 g · l−1 had significantly fewer cracks and showed smoother surfaces than untreated fruit. This explains the quality improvement in agar-coated fruit compared to uncoated fruit. Overall, agar colloid, a safe coating agent, could be used to protect banana fruit against postharvest rot diseases and extend fruit storage life during ripening and storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar coating at 2.0 g · l−1 reduced postharvest disease incidence in banana fruit compared with untreated fruit.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
agar-agar suspension particularly at 2.0 g · l−1e0
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“Coated-ba-nana fruit samples with different concentrations of agar-agar suspension particularly at 2.0 g · l−1 exhibited a significant reduction in incidence and severity of postharvest diseases compared to untreated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar coating at 2.0 g · l−1 reduced postharvest disease severity in banana fruit compared with untreated fruit.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
agar-agar suspension particularly at 2.0 g · l−1e0
Outcome
severity of postharvest diseasese0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“Coated-ba-nana fruit samples with different concentrations of agar-agar suspension particularly at 2.0 g · l−1 exhibited a significant reduction in incidence and severity of postharvest diseases compared to untreated fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping banana fruit in agar for 5, 10, or 15 minutes reduced disease incidence and severity.

Taxon
Bananae0
Treatment
agar suspension at 2.0 g · l−1 for 5, 10 and 15 mine0
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Banana fruits dipped in agar suspension at 2.0 g · l−1 for 5, 10 and 15 min showed significant reduction in disease incidence and severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar coating reduced banana fruit weight loss during storage.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
agar suspension as a coating agent at 2.0 g · l−1e0
Outcome
weight loss (%)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
for 15 days at 25 ± 2°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of agar suspension as a coating agent at 2.0 g · l−1 significantly decreased weight loss (%), firmness loss (%), and soluble solid concentration of banana fruit for 15 days at 25 ± 2°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar coating reduced banana fruit firmness loss during storage.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
agar suspension as a coating agent at 2.0 g · l−1e0
Outcome
firmness loss (%)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
for 15 days at 25 ± 2°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of agar suspension as a coating agent at 2.0 g · l−1 significantly decreased weight loss (%), firmness loss (%), and soluble solid concentration of banana fruit for 15 days at 25 ± 2°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar coating decreased banana fruit soluble solid concentration during storage.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
agar suspension as a coating agent at 2.0 g · l−1e0
Outcome
soluble solid concentration of banana fruite0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
for 15 days at 25 ± 2°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“application of agar suspension as a coating agent at 2.0 g · l−1 significantly decreased weight loss (%), firmness loss (%), and soluble solid concentration of banana fruit for 15 days at 25 ± 2°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar coated banana fruit had fewer cracks and smoother surfaces than untreated fruit.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
agar colloid at 2.0 g · l−1e0
Outcome
cracks and showed smoother surfacese0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
untreated fruite0

Verbatim

e0

“fruit coated with agar colloid at 2.0 g · l−1 had significantly fewer cracks and showed smoother surfaces than untreated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose agar colloid to protect banana fruit from postharvest rot and extend storage life.

Taxon
bananae0
Outcome
protect banana fruit against postharvest rot diseases and extend fruit storage lifee0

Verbatim

e0

“agar colloid, a safe coating agent, could be used to protect banana fruit against postharvest rot diseases and extend fruit storage life during ripening and storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1366 · show in text ↑

agar · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

agar · disease · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · molecular: metabolites · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

82 papers: 70 positive, 12 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.