Paper · 2018 · Applied and Environmental Soil Science

Plant Growth Response ofPinus patulaandP. maximinoiSeedlings at Nursery to Three Types of Ectomycorrhizal Inocula

Manuel F. Restrepo-Llano; Nelson W. Osorio-Vega; Juan D. León-Peláez

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the response in seedling growth, root colonization, and P content of seedlings of Pinus maximinoi and P. patula to the inoculation with three types of ectomycorrhizal inocula with three doses (17.5, 35, and 70 kg·m −3 ) in nursery. The first inoculum was soil from a Pinus plantations that contained three ectomycorrhizal fungi ( Amanita muscaria, Amanita sp ., and Suillus luteus ); the second was a crude inoculum composed by root fragments of Pinus seedlings colonized by S. luteus suspended in a sterile matrix soil-sand; the third inoculum was a mixture of two ectomycorrhizal fungi A. muscaria and S. luteus produced under in vitro conditions in the potato-dextrose-agar medium. The results showed that the inoculum produced in vitro was most effective to promote plant growth and ectomycorrhizal colonization of roots in both plant species. Also, the effects on seedlings were significantly higher with the increase of the doses. In P. patula there were not significant effects on foliar P content with type and dose of inocula, whereas in P. maximinoi there were interactive effects of both factors. In this case, better results were obtained with the inoculum produced under in vitro conditions and with the highest dose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro inoculum most effectively promoted growth in both pine species.

Taxon
Pinus maximinoi and P. patulaPinus patulaPinus maximinoie1
Treatment
inoculum produced in vitroe0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pinus maximinoi
Pinus maximinoi · Taxontian2992 from Guatemala, Guatemala · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the inoculum produced in vitro was most effective to promote plant growth and ectomycorrhizal colonization of roots in both plant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedlings of Pinus maximinoi and P. patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro inoculum most effectively promoted root ectomycorrhizal colonization in both pine species.

Taxon
Pinus maximinoi and P. patulaPinus patulaPinus maximinoie1
Treatment
inoculum produced in vitroe0
Outcome
ectomycorrhizal colonization of rootse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pinus maximinoi
Pinus maximinoi · Taxontian2992 from Guatemala, Guatemala · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the inoculum produced in vitro was most effective to promote plant growth and ectomycorrhizal colonization of roots in both plant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedlings of Pinus maximinoi and P. patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher inoculum doses produced significantly greater seedling effects.

Taxon
Pinus maximinoi and P. patulaPinus patulaPinus maximinoie1
Treatment
increase of the dosese0
Outcome
effects on seedlingse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pinus maximinoi
Pinus maximinoi · Taxontian2992 from Guatemala, Guatemala · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects on seedlings were significantly higher with the increase of the doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“seedlings of Pinus maximinoi and P. patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum type and dose had no significant effect on P. patula foliar P.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae0
Treatment
type and dose of inoculae0
Outcome
foliar P contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In P. patula there were not significant effects on foliar P content with type and dose of inocula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1076 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculum type and dose interacted for P. maximinoi foliar P.

Taxon
P. maximinoiPinus maximinoie0
Treatment
inoculum produced under in vitro conditionse0
Outcome
interactive effects of both factorse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus maximinoi
Pinus maximinoi · Taxontian2992 from Guatemala, Guatemala · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas in P. maximinoi there were interactive effects of both factors. In this case, better results were obtained with the inoculum produced under in vitro conditions and with the highest dose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1272 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.