Paper · 2018 · Crop Science

Agronomic Responses of Brassica carinata to Herbicide, Seeding Rate, and Nitrogen on the Northern Great Plains

Zakir Hossain; Eric N. Johnson; Robert E. Blackshaw; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Brassica carinata A. Braun seeds contain high erucic and linolenic acids that are desirable for biofuel and biopolymer products. However, key agronomic practices to maximize carinata productivity on the Northern Great Plains are not well known. Here, we investigated the response of seed yield and quality to three key agronomic factors—herbicide, seeding rate, and N. The factorial experiment, conducted in nine environments (site‐years) on the Canadian prairies from 2014 to 2016, included two weed control options (weedy vs. weed‐controlled), three levels of N application (low = 32–97 kg N ha −1 , medium = 75–198 kg N ha −1 , and high = 117–297 kg N ha −1 ), and five seeding rates (50, 100, 150, 200, and 300 seeds m −2 ). On average, weed biomass with the herbicide‐applied treatment was 245 kg dry matter ha −1 , significantly lower than the 1338 kg dry matter ha −1 with the non‐herbicide treatment, leading to 37% greater seed yield. In four of the nine environments, medium and high N fertilizer rates increased seed yield by 29 and 45%, respectively, compared with the low‐N treatment, but N fertilizer did not affect yield in the remaining five environments. Increasing seeding rates decreased weed biomass and increased seed yield. Seed oil and protein contents ranged from 37.2 to 48.5% and 22.6 to 36.3%, respectively, and these two traits had an inverse linear relationship. These results demonstrate that carinata may be well adapted to the Northern Great Plains as an alternative oilseed crop, and that seed yield and quality responses to key agronomic factors can vary with environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide reduced weed biomass to 245 versus 1338 kg dry matter ha −1 without herbicide.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Treatment
herbicide‐applied treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
245 kg dry matter ha −1e0
Qualifier
1338 kg dry matter ha −1e0
Comparator
non‐herbicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed biomass with the herbicide‐applied treatment was 245 kg dry matter ha −1 , significantly lower than the 1338 kg dry matter ha −1 with the non‐herbicide treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide weed control produced 37% greater carinata seed yield.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Treatment
herbicide‐applied treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
37%e0
Comparator
non‐herbicide treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed biomass with the herbicide‐applied treatment was 245 kg dry matter ha −1 , significantly lower than the 1338 kg dry matter ha −1 with the non‐herbicide treatment, leading to 37% greater seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium nitrogen increased carinata seed yield by 29% versus low nitrogen in four environments.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Treatment
mediume0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29e0
Qualifier
four of the nine environmentse0
Comparator
low‐N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In four of the nine environments, medium and high N fertilizer rates increased seed yield by 29 and 45%, respectively, compared with the low‐N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen increased carinata seed yield by 45% versus low nitrogen in four environments.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Treatment
high N fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45%e0
Qualifier
four of the nine environmentse0
Comparator
low‐N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In four of the nine environments, medium and high N fertilizer rates increased seed yield by 29 and 45%, respectively, compared with the low‐N treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer did not affect yield in the remaining five environments.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Treatment
N fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
remaining five environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilizer did not affect yield in the remaining five environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rates decreased weed biomass.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Treatment
Increasing seeding ratese0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing seeding rates decreased weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding rates increased carinata seed yield.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Treatment
Increasing seeding ratese0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing seeding rates decreased weed biomass and increased seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carinata seed oil content ranged from 37.2 to 48.5%.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Outcome
Seed oile0
Value
37.2 to 48.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed oil and protein contents ranged from 37.2 to 48.5% and 22.6 to 36.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carinata seed protein content ranged from 22.6 to 36.3%.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Outcome
protein contentse0
Value
22.6 to 36.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed oil and protein contents ranged from 37.2 to 48.5% and 22.6 to 36.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed oil and protein contents had an inverse linear relationship.

Taxon
Brassica carinataBrassica carinatat0
Organ / stage
Seede0
Outcome
Seed oil and protein contentse0
Direction
inversee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed oil and protein contents ranged from 37.2 to 48.5% and 22.6 to 36.3%, respectively, and these two traits had an inverse linear relationship.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica carinata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–40 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carinata may be adapted to the Northern Great Plains as an alternative oilseed crop.

Taxon
carinataBrassica carinatae0
Outcome
well adapted to the Northern Great Plains as an alternative oilseed crope0
Setting
Northern Great Plainse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica carinata
Brassica carinata · TaxonZtmcfaul · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carinata may be well adapted to the Northern Great Plains as an alternative oilseed crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1511 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

density · yield · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Brassica carinata (Ethiopian mustard)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.