Paper · 2018 · Experimental Agriculture

CARBON AND NUTRIENT LOSSES THROUGH BIOMASS BURNING, AND LINKS WITH SOIL FERTILITY AND YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA) PRODUCTION

AYA B. N'DRI; ARMAND W. KONE; SEBASTIEN K. K. LOUKOU; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Biomass burning has links with a number of global concerns including soil health, food security and climate change. In central Côte d'Ivoire (West Africa), we conducted a field study to compare nutrient losses, soil fertility and yam yield in slash-and-burn versus slash-and-mulch agriculture. Trials involved five sites established in the dominant Chromolaena odorata fallows of the region, each consisting of paired plots: slash and burnt biomass (SB) versus slashed and unburnt biomass, but left to serve as mulch (SM). Carbon and five elemental nutrients were assessed in the aboveground biomass prior to burning and in ash after fires; losses were assessed by subtraction. The greatest proportions of loss occurred with C (95%), N (95%) and K (74%), corresponding to losses into the atmosphere of 3532 ± 408, 200 ± 36, 132 ± 36 kg ha −1 . Six weeks after the fire, soil properties were assessed: soil organic C, total N and Mg 2+ were higher in SM than in SB sites. At final harvest, yam tuber yield was twice as large in SM as in SB (18 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 2 Mg ha −1 ) with soil C, total N and K + as the main influential soil parameters. The key finding was that the elements lost in greatest proportion during burning were those mostly influencing yam yields. Because a clear negative relationship between biomass burning and yam production has been established the promotion of the more productive, alternate slash-and-mulch system compared to slash-and-burn system, is warranted. The findings of our research can be used in support of developing a sustainable yam production system in the region and in West Africa more generally.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning lost 95% of biomass carbon.

Taxon
YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)Dioscorea alatat0
Outcome
loss occurred with Ce0
Value
95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest proportions of loss occurred with C (95%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning lost 95% of biomass nitrogen.

Taxon
YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)Dioscorea alatat0
Outcome
Ne0
Value
95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N (95%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning lost 74% of biomass potassium.

Taxon
YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)Dioscorea alatat0
Outcome
Ke0
Value
74%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K (74%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon, nitrogen and magnesium were higher with mulch than burning.

Taxon
YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)Dioscorea alatat0
Treatment
SMe0
Outcome
soil organic C, total N and Mg 2+e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil organic C, total N and Mg 2+ were higher in SM than in SB sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yam tuber yield was twice as large with mulch as with burning.

Taxon
yame0
Treatment
SMe0
Outcome
yam tuber yielde0
Direction
twice as largee0
Value
18 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 2 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
SBe0

Verbatim

e0

“yam tuber yield was twice as large in SM as in SB (18 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 2 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1075 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil carbon, nitrogen and potassium were main influential parameters for yam yield.

Taxon
YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)Dioscorea alatat0
Compound
soil C, total N and K +e0
Outcome
yam tuber yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At final harvest, yam tuber yield was twice as large in SM as in SB (18 ± 4 vs. 9 ± 2 Mg ha −1 ) with soil C, total N and K + as the main influential soil parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–107 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elements lost most during burning mostly influenced yam yields.

Taxon
yame0
Treatment
burninge0
Outcome
yam yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the elements lost in greatest proportion during burning were those mostly influencing yam yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1267 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend slash-and-mulch over slash-and-burn for yam production.

Taxon
YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)Dioscorea alatat0
Outcome
promotion of the more productive, alternate slash-and-mulch system compared to slash-and-burn systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dioscorea alata
Dioscorea alata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the promotion of the more productive, alternate slash-and-mulch system compared to slash-and-burn system, is warranted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1489 · show in text ↑
t0

“YAM (DIOSCOREA ALATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–107 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · DioscoreaResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.