Abstract
The study was conducted at Mundopasha, Wazirpur, Barisal during Rabi season of 2017 for testing, adoption and popularization of different conservation machinery (CA) such as zero till planter (ZT), strip till planter (ST), bed planter (BP) and power tiller operated seeder (PTOS) along with conventional tilling and of sowing method for planting of mungbean (BARI Mung-6). The soil type was loamy-sand with bulk density 1.41 g/cc. The effective field capacities of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were found to be 0.104, 0.109, 0.084, 0.109, and 0.074 ha/h, respectively. The field efficiency of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were estimated as 74.68, 76.47, 75.84, 78.16 and 71.52%, respectively. Significantly the highest mungbean grain yields were found from ZT and ST planted plots than those of other plots. Significantly the lowest grain yield was obtained from conventional tillage and broadcasting method. The highest benefit cost ratio (BCR) was obtained from ST planted (2.60) and zero till planted (2.40) mungbean followed by PTOS (2.20), conventional tillage cum broadcasting (1.88) and bed planting (1.82) methods. The lowest BCR was found from traditional tillage and manual line sowing method (1.61) of mungbean. CA planting system saved about 50% planting cost and reduced about 76% carbon dioxide emission. Based on the fuel consumption, grain yield and BCR, ZT planter and the strip till planter may be recommended in Barisal region for cultivation of mungbean.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Zero till and strip till planted mungbean plots gave the highest grain yields.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat1 - Treatment
- ZT and ST planted plotse3
- Outcome
- mungbean grain yieldse3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Comparator
- those of other plotse3
- Setting
- Mundopasha, Wazirpur, Barisale6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Significantly the highest mungbean grain yields were found from ZT and ST planted plots than those of other plots”
e6“The study was conducted at Mundopasha, Wazirpur, Barisal during Rabi season of 2017”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage and broadcasting gave the lowest mungbean grain yield.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- conventional tillage and broadcasting methode4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
- Direction
- loweste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Significantly the lowest grain yield was obtained from conventional tillage and broadcasting method”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip till planted mungbean had the highest benefit cost ratio, 2.60.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- ST plantede5
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratio (BCR)e5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 2.60e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The highest benefit cost ratio (BCR) was obtained from ST planted (2.60) and zero till planted (2.40) mungbean”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero till planted mungbean had a benefit cost ratio of 2.40.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- zero till plantede5
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratio (BCR)e5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 2.40e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The highest benefit cost ratio (BCR) was obtained from ST planted (2.60) and zero till planted (2.40) mungbean”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Traditional tillage and manual line sowing gave the lowest benefit cost ratio, 1.61.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- traditional tillage and manual line sowing methode6
- Outcome
- BCRe6
- Direction
- loweste6
- Value
- 1.61e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“The lowest BCR was found from traditional tillage and manual line sowing method (1.61) of mungbean”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
The conservation planting system saved about 50% of planting cost.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- CA planting systeme7
- Outcome
- planting coste7
- Direction
- savede7
- Value
- 50%e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“CA planting system saved about 50% planting cost and reduced about 76% carbon dioxide emission”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
The conservation planting system reduced carbon dioxide emission by about 76%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- CA planting systeme7
- Outcome
- carbon dioxide emissione7
- Direction
- reducede7
- Value
- 76%e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“CA planting system saved about 50% planting cost and reduced about 76% carbon dioxide emission”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero till planter effective field capacity was 0.104 ha/h.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- ZTe1
- Outcome
- effective field capacitiese1
- Value
- 0.104e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effective field capacities of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were found to be 0.104, 0.109, 0.084, 0.109, and 0.074 ha/h, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip till planter effective field capacity was 0.109 ha/h.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- STe1
- Outcome
- effective field capacitiese1
- Value
- 0.109e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effective field capacities of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were found to be 0.104, 0.109, 0.084, 0.109, and 0.074 ha/h, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Bed planter effective field capacity was 0.084 ha/h.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- BPe1
- Outcome
- effective field capacitiese1
- Value
- 0.084e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effective field capacities of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were found to be 0.104, 0.109, 0.084, 0.109, and 0.074 ha/h, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
PTOS seeder effective field capacity was 0.109 ha/h.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- PTOSe1
- Outcome
- effective field capacitiese1
- Value
- 0.109e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effective field capacities of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were found to be 0.104, 0.109, 0.084, 0.109, and 0.074 ha/h, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Power tiller effective field capacity was 0.074 ha/h.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- power tillere1
- Outcome
- effective field capacitiese1
- Value
- 0.074e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The effective field capacities of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were found to be 0.104, 0.109, 0.084, 0.109, and 0.074 ha/h, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero till planter field efficiency was 74.68%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- ZTe2
- Outcome
- field efficiencye2
- Value
- 74.68e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The field efficiency of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were estimated as 74.68, 76.47, 75.84, 78.16 and 71.52%, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Strip till planter field efficiency was 76.47%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- STe2
- Outcome
- field efficiencye2
- Value
- 76.47e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The field efficiency of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were estimated as 74.68, 76.47, 75.84, 78.16 and 71.52%, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Bed planter field efficiency was 75.84%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- BPe2
- Outcome
- field efficiencye2
- Value
- 75.84e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The field efficiency of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were estimated as 74.68, 76.47, 75.84, 78.16 and 71.52%, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
PTOS seeder field efficiency was 78.16%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- PTOSe2
- Outcome
- field efficiencye2
- Value
- 78.16e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The field efficiency of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were estimated as 74.68, 76.47, 75.84, 78.16 and 71.52%, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
Power tiller field efficiency was 71.52%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- power tillere2
- Outcome
- field efficiencye2
- Value
- 71.52%e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The field efficiency of ZT, ST, BP, PTOS and power tiller were estimated as 74.68, 76.47, 75.84, 78.16 and 71.52%, respectively”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend zero till and strip till planters for mungbean cultivation in the Barisal region.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat1
- Treatment
- ZT planter and the strip till plantere7
- Outcome
- cultivation of mungbeane7
- Setting
- Barisal regione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“ZT planter and the strip till planter may be recommended in Barisal region for cultivation of mungbean”
t1“Appropriate Conservation Machinery for Mungbean Cultivation in the Southern Region of Bangladesh”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.