Abstract
In a modern and sustainable agriculture, the use of biofertilizers, soil amendments and suitable plant geometry with mechanization are eligible to increase plant production and to meet economic criteria to enhance soil fertility and to minimize environmental damage. A field experiment for consecutive two years i.e. 2014-16 and 2015-17 was conducted at research farm of Genda Singh Sugarcane Breeding and Research Institute, Seorahi, Kushinagar in autumn season to find out optimum plant geometry and nutrients management for efficient use of machinery with economics. The soil of the experimental plot was medium in organic carbon, medium in available phosphorus and low in potash with pH 8.2. The experiment consisting of four plant geometry i.e. S 1 -90 cm row spacing (conventional method), S 2 -Trench planting in paired row at 120 (90:30) cm. S 3 -Trench planting in paired row at 150 (120:30) cm. S 4 -Trench planting in paired row at 180 (150:30) cm and two nutrient management practices i.e. F 1 -100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics F 2 -100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizers (Azotobacter + P.S.B. @ 10 kg/ha each) was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design with three replications. On the basis of pooled data of two years, S 2 treated plot produced significantly higher cane yield (104.72 t/ha) over other geometry operations. Gross income, net return (Rs. 175593/ha) and B: C ratios (1.50) were recorded significantly higher in S 2 plant geometry treatment compared with remaining geometry treatments. Effect of nutrient management on gross return, net return, B: C ratio (1.44) and cane productivity (100.72 t/ha) were calculated significantly higher in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizers (Azotobacter + P.S.B. @ 10 kg/ha treated plots (F 2 ) but effects on plant height and cane length were non significant. Sucrose per cent was not affected significantly with different treatments of plant geometry and nutrient managements operations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Trench planting in paired row at 120 (90:30) cm produced significantly higher cane yield than other geometry operations.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e1“S 2 -Trench planting in paired row at 120 (90:30) cm”
e2“S 2 treated plot produced significantly higher cane yield (104.72 t/ha) over other geometry operations”
Claim · model-written summary
Net return was significantly higher in the 120 cm paired-row trench planting than in the remaining geometry treatments.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e3“Gross income, net return (Rs. 175593/ha) and B: C ratios (1.50) were recorded significantly higher in S 2 plant geometry treatment compared with remaining geometry treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
B:C ratio was significantly higher in the 120 cm paired-row trench planting than in the remaining geometry treatments.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e3“Gross income, net return (Rs. 175593/ha) and B: C ratios (1.50) were recorded significantly higher in S 2 plant geometry treatment compared with remaining geometry treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross income was significantly higher in the 120 cm paired-row trench planting than in the remaining geometry treatments.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e3“Gross income, net return (Rs. 175593/ha) and B: C ratios (1.50) were recorded significantly higher in S 2 plant geometry treatment compared with remaining geometry treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane productivity was significantly higher under 100% recommended fertilizer plus 25% N as organic manure with biofertilizers than under the other nutrient practice.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizerse4
- Outcome
- cane productivitye4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 100.72 t/hae4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e4“Effect of nutrient management on gross return, net return, B: C ratio (1.44) and cane productivity (100.72 t/ha) were calculated significantly higher in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizers (Azotobacter + P.S.B. @ 10 kg/ha treated plots (F 2 )”
Claim · model-written summary
B:C ratio was significantly higher under the 100% recommended fertilizer plus 25% N as organic manure with biofertilizers treatment.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizerse4
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe4
- Direction
- highere4
- Value
- 1.44e4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e4“Effect of nutrient management on gross return, net return, B: C ratio (1.44) and cane productivity (100.72 t/ha) were calculated significantly higher in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizers (Azotobacter + P.S.B. @ 10 kg/ha treated plots (F 2 )”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross return and net return were significantly higher under the combined nutrient management treatment.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizerse4
- Outcome
- gross return, net returne4
- Direction
- highere4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e4“Effect of nutrient management on gross return, net return, B: C ratio (1.44) and cane productivity (100.72 t/ha) were calculated significantly higher in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizers (Azotobacter + P.S.B. @ 10 kg/ha treated plots (F 2 )”
Claim · model-written summary
Sucrose percentage was not significantly affected by plant geometry or nutrient management.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- different treatments of plant geometry and nutrient managements operationse6
- Outcome
- Sucrose per cente6
- Direction
- not affectede6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e6“Sucrose per cent was not affected significantly with different treatments of plant geometry and nutrient managements operations”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management did not significantly affect plant height or cane length.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- nutrient managemente4
- Outcome
- plant height and cane lengthe7
- Direction
- non significante7
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane”
e4“Effect of nutrient management on gross return, net return, B: C ratio (1.44) and cane productivity (100.72 t/ha) were calculated significantly higher in 100% recommended dose of fertilizers through inorganics and 25 % N through organic manures along with biofertilizers (Azotobacter + P.S.B. @ 10 kg/ha treated plots (F 2 )”
e7“effects on plant height and cane length were non significant”
The same questions in other papers
inorganic molecular entity · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
143 papers more in this group
See all 147 papers →fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
342 papers more in this group
See all 346 papers →organic · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.