Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Performance of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) Intercropping as Influenced by Row Ratios and Nutri Cereal Crops

Mallik arjun; B. G. Koppalkar; B. K. Desai; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted during the rainy season of 2015 and 2016 at UAS, Raichur to evaluate the production potential of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) under sole and intercropping with nutri cereal crops under two row proportions of 1:1 and 1:2. Ten treatments consisted of intercropping of pigeonpea with millets (nutri cereals) sorghum, pearl millet and foxtail millet in single and double row proportions and their respective sole stand were evaluated. The pooled mean of yield and yield related attributes of pigeonpea increased when intercropping with foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratio (964 and 1017 kg ha-1 in 2015 and 2016) was found at par with pigeonpea + sorghum (1:1) (889 and 930 kg ha-1), pigeonpea + foxtail millet (1:2) (834 and 861 kg ha-1) and pigeonpea + pearl millet (1:1) (788 and 836 kg ha-1), respectively. Intercropping of pigeonpea with either sorghum or foxtail millet irrespective of row proportions recorded significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield. However intercropping of pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportions was most remunerative with net returns and B: C ratio of 46,597 Rs ha-1 and 2.74 and 44,068 Rs ha-1 and 2.63 respectively and ensured higher land equivalent ratio of 1.40 and 1.45 respectively indicating higher biological efficiency of systems. Sole stand of pigeonpea were superior in terms yield and yield attributes and pigeonpea equivalent yield over intercropped treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea yield and yield attributes increased when intercropped with foxtail millet in a 1:1 row ratio.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
intercropping with foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratioe1
Outcome
yield and yield related attributese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
964 and 1017 kg ha-1e1
Setting
Raichure0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Field experiment was conducted during the rainy season of 2015 and 2016 at UAS, Raichur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pooled mean of yield and yield related attributes of pigeonpea increased when intercropping with foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratio (964 and 1017 kg ha-1 in 2015 and 2016)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea intercropped with sorghum in a 1:1 row ratio yielded at par with pigeonpea intercropped with foxtail millet in a 1:1 row ratio.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + sorghum (1:1)e2
Outcome
pooled mean of yielde1
Direction
at par withe2
Value
889 and 930 kg ha-1e2
Comparator
foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratioe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pooled mean of yield and yield related attributes of pigeonpea increased when intercropping with foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratio (964 and 1017 kg ha-1 in 2015 and 2016)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–635 · show in text ↑
e2

“was found at par with pigeonpea + sorghum (1:1) (889 and 930 kg ha-1), pigeonpea + foxtail millet (1:2) (834 and 861 kg ha-1) and pigeonpea + pearl millet (1:1) (788 and 836 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea intercropped with foxtail millet in a 1:2 row ratio yielded at par with pigeonpea intercropped with foxtail millet in a 1:1 row ratio.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + foxtail millet (1:2)e2
Outcome
pooled mean of yielde1
Direction
at par withe2
Value
834 and 861 kg ha-1e2
Comparator
foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratioe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pooled mean of yield and yield related attributes of pigeonpea increased when intercropping with foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratio (964 and 1017 kg ha-1 in 2015 and 2016)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–635 · show in text ↑
e2

“was found at par with pigeonpea + sorghum (1:1) (889 and 930 kg ha-1), pigeonpea + foxtail millet (1:2) (834 and 861 kg ha-1) and pigeonpea + pearl millet (1:1) (788 and 836 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea intercropped with pearl millet in a 1:1 row ratio yielded at par with pigeonpea intercropped with foxtail millet in a 1:1 row ratio.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + pearl millet (1:1)e2
Outcome
pooled mean of yielde1
Direction
at par withe2
Value
788 and 836 kg ha-1e2
Comparator
foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratioe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“The pooled mean of yield and yield related attributes of pigeonpea increased when intercropping with foxtail millet in 1:1 row ratio (964 and 1017 kg ha-1 in 2015 and 2016)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–635 · show in text ↑
e2

“was found at par with pigeonpea + sorghum (1:1) (889 and 930 kg ha-1), pigeonpea + foxtail millet (1:2) (834 and 861 kg ha-1) and pigeonpea + pearl millet (1:1) (788 and 836 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping pigeonpea with sorghum or foxtail millet significantly increased pigeonpea equivalent yield regardless of row proportion.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Intercropping of pigeonpea with either sorghum or foxtail millete3
Outcome
pigeonpea equivalent yielde3
Direction
significantly highere3
Qualifier
irrespective of row proportionse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“Intercropping of pigeonpea with either sorghum or foxtail millet irrespective of row proportions recorded significantly higher pigeonpea equivalent yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + sorghum intercropping was most remunerative in net returns (46,597 Rs ha-1 at 1:1).

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportionse4
Outcome
net returnse4
Direction
most remunerativee4
Value
46,597 Rs ha-1e4
Qualifier
44,068 Rs ha-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e4

“intercropping of pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportions was most remunerative with net returns and B: C ratio of 46,597 Rs ha-1 and 2.74 and 44,068 Rs ha-1 and 2.63 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + sorghum intercropping was most remunerative in B: C ratio (2.74 at 1:1).

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportionse4
Outcome
B: C ratioe4
Direction
most remunerativee4
Value
2.74e4
Qualifier
2.63e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e4

“intercropping of pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportions was most remunerative with net returns and B: C ratio of 46,597 Rs ha-1 and 2.74 and 44,068 Rs ha-1 and 2.63 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea + sorghum intercropping had higher land equivalent ratio (1.40 and 1.45).

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportionse4
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe5
Direction
highere5
Value
1.40 and 1.45e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e4

“intercropping of pigeonpea + sorghum in both 1:1 and 1:2 row proportions was most remunerative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1091 · show in text ↑
e5

“ensured higher land equivalent ratio of 1.40 and 1.45 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole stand of pigeonpea was superior to intercropped treatments in yield and yield attributes and pigeonpea equivalent yield.

Taxon
Cajanus cajanCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Sole stand of pigeonpeae6
Outcome
yield and yield attributese6
Direction
superiore6
Comparator
intercropped treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–40 · show in text ↑
e6

“Sole stand of pigeonpea were superior in terms yield and yield attributes and pigeonpea equivalent yield over intercropped treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1448 · show in text ↑

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Sorghum · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Setaria italica · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.