Paper · 1960 · The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico

The Influence of Fertilizers on Cigar-Filler Tobacco Quality

George Samuels

15
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The influence of fertilizers on cigar-filler tobacco quality, as judged by price per pound, was investigated, using three crops of a major-element fertilizer (N-P2O5-K2O) experiment at Aibonito on a Juncos clay and a source-of-nitrogen experiment at Caguas clay. The results obtained were as follows: 1. The use of 50 pounds per acre of nitrogen increased the quality of the tobacco significantly when compared to the no-nitrogen treatment. 2. Rates up to 150 pounds per acre of nitrogen did not increase significantly either yield or quality of tobacco per acre over the 50-pound-per-acre nitrogen treatment. However, the quality of the tobacco was not reduced by the high nitrogen applications. 3. Phosphates and potash failed to increase the quality of the tobacco. 4. Lime and magnesium oxide increased the quality of the tobacco. 5. The other sources of nitrogen used failed to increase the quality of the tobacco, as far as price per pound was concerned, beyond the price of the tobacco produced with ammonium sulfate. 6. The burning rates of cigars made with tobacco fertilized with various nitrogen sources showed urea to give the slowest rate of burning, and a mixture of urea and cottonseed meal the most rapid. Ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen source was about intermediate between these. 7. The nicotine content of the tobacco increased with applications of nitrogen up to the 100-pound-per-acre level. Phosphate and potash applications tended to lower the nicotine content of the tobacco leaf. 8. A discussion of the influence of fertilizers on quality of the tobacco is presented to aid the farmer in his use of fertilizer to increase tobacco quality. Warning is also given that these relationships on the relation between yield and quality of tobacco cannot be regarded as applicable to all commercial tobacco-growing in Puerto Rico until further work is done on other tobacco soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50 pounds per acre of nitrogen significantly increased tobacco quality versus no nitrogen.

Treatment
50 pounds per acre of nitrogene0
Outcome
quality of the tobaccoe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no-nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of 50 pounds per acre of nitrogen increased the quality of the tobacco significantly when compared to the no-nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 304–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen up to 150 pounds per acre did not significantly raise yield above 50 pounds per acre.

Treatment
Rates up to 150 pounds per acre of nitrogene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
50-pound-per-acre nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates up to 150 pounds per acre of nitrogen did not increase significantly either yield or quality of tobacco per acre over the 50-pound-per-acre nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen up to 150 pounds per acre did not significantly raise tobacco quality above 50 pounds per acre.

Treatment
Rates up to 150 pounds per acre of nitrogene0
Outcome
quality of tobacco per acree0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
50-pound-per-acre nitrogen treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rates up to 150 pounds per acre of nitrogen did not increase significantly either yield or quality of tobacco per acre over the 50-pound-per-acre nitrogen treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen applications did not reduce tobacco quality.

Treatment
high nitrogen applicationse0
Outcome
quality of the tobaccoe0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of the tobacco was not reduced by the high nitrogen applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphates failed to increase tobacco quality.

Treatment
Phosphatese0
Outcome
quality of the tobaccoe0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphates and potash failed to increase the quality of the tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash failed to increase tobacco quality.

Treatment
potashe0
Outcome
quality of the tobaccoe0
Direction
failed to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphates and potash failed to increase the quality of the tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime increased tobacco quality.

Treatment
Limee0
Outcome
quality of the tobaccoe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lime and magnesium oxide increased the quality of the tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium oxide increased tobacco quality.

Treatment
magnesium oxidee0
Outcome
quality of the tobaccoe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lime and magnesium oxide increased the quality of the tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–833 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other nitrogen sources did not improve tobacco price per pound beyond ammonium sulfate.

Treatment
other sources of nitrogene0
Outcome
price per pounde0
Direction
failed to increasee0
Comparator
ammonium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other sources of nitrogen used failed to increase the quality of the tobacco, as far as price per pound was concerned, beyond the price of the tobacco produced with ammonium sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea yielded the slowest cigar burning rate.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
rate of burninge0
Direction
sloweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea to give the slowest rate of burning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea with cottonseed meal yielded the most rapid cigar burning rate.

Treatment
a mixture of urea and cottonseed meale0
Outcome
most rapide0
Direction
most rapide0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a mixture of urea and cottonseed meal the most rapid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate yielded an intermediate cigar burning rate.

Treatment
Ammonium sulfatee0
Outcome
about intermediatee0
Direction
about intermediatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen source was about intermediate between these”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased tobacco nicotine content through 100 pounds per acre.

Treatment
applications of nitrogen up to the 100-pound-per-acre levele0
Outcome
nicotine content of the tobaccoe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nicotine content of the tobacco increased with applications of nitrogen up to the 100-pound-per-acre level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate tended to lower tobacco leaf nicotine content.

Treatment
Phosphatee0
Outcome
nicotine content of the tobacco leafe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate and potash applications tended to lower the nicotine content of the tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash tended to lower tobacco leaf nicotine content.

Treatment
potashe0
Outcome
nicotine content of the tobacco leafe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate and potash applications tended to lower the nicotine content of the tobacco leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1503 · show in text ↑

phosphate · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

magnesium oxide · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ

103 papers: 85 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

lime · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 28 positive, 11 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.