Paper · 2018 · Scientia Agricola

Winery distillery waste compost effect on the performance of melon crop under field conditions

Raquel Villena; María Teresa Castellanos; María Carmen Cartagena; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The substantial generation of organic waste together with increasing interest in developing sustainable agriculture heralds an opportunity for mobilizing the recycling of these materials as a source of organic matter and nutrients into a viable management strategy option. A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the use of compost derived from waste produced by the winery and distillery industries in a drip-irrigated melon crop traditionally grown in the area where these wastes are generated. A randomized complete block design was used with four treatments consisting of three different dose levels of compost: 7 (D1), 13 (D2) and 20 (D3) t ha−1 and a control (D0) without the application of compost. The effects of these treatments on plant growth, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) accumulation as well as fruit yield and quality were studied. The application of compost produced a slight increase in plant biomass accompanied by changes in the relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR). As a result, a significant improvement in fruit yield was observed in the plots amended with D2, which met all the requirements to obtain elevated yields. In terms of environmental correctness applications were below the limits established by a number of impact indexes. Additionally, the application of compost improved fruit quality resulting in an enhancement of Brix degrees. Although the potential effects of N and P derived from compost were partially masked by other inputs of these nutrients into the system (N in irrigation water, P supplied through fertigation), an effect of P was observed resulting in an increase in the number of individual fruits in the plots amended with compost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost slightly increased melon biomass.

Taxon
melon cropCucumis melot0
Treatment
application of composte0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
slighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of compost produced a slight increase in plant biomass accompanied by changes in the relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost changed melon relative growth rate.

Taxon
melon cropCucumis melot0
Treatment
application of composte0
Outcome
relative growth rate (RGR)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of compost produced a slight increase in plant biomass accompanied by changes in the relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost changed melon net assimilation rate.

Taxon
melon cropCucumis melot0
Treatment
application of composte0
Outcome
net assimilation rate (NAR)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of compost produced a slight increase in plant biomass accompanied by changes in the relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

D2 compost significantly improved melon fruit yield.

Taxon
melon cropCucumis melot0
Treatment
D2e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant improvement in fruit yield was observed in the plots amended with D2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost applications remained below impact-index limits.

Taxon
melon cropCucumis melot0
Outcome
applicationse0
Direction
belowe0
Comparator
limits established by a number of impact indexese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applications were below the limits established by a number of impact indexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased melon Brix degrees.

Taxon
melon cropCucumis melot0
Treatment
application of composte0
Outcome
Brix degreese0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of compost improved fruit quality resulting in an enhancement of Brix degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost-derived phosphorus increased the number of individual melon fruits.

Taxon
melon cropCucumis melot0
Treatment
composte0
Compound
Pe0
Outcome
number of individual fruitse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an effect of P was observed resulting in an increase in the number of individual fruits in the plots amended with compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1709 · show in text ↑
t0

“melon crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–71 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 57 positive, 17 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.