Paper · 2018 · University writing server of the University of Hohenheim (Universität Hohenheim)

Biochar amendment for C sequestration in a temperate agroecosystem : implications for microbial C- and N-cycling

Chris Bamminger

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Climate warming will have great impact on terrestrial ecosystems. Different soil properties such as temperature and moisture will be altered, thereby influencing C- and N-cycles, microbial activity as well as plant growth. This may contribute to the observed increase in soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under climate change. Therefore, new options are needed to mitigate theses projected consequences. Biochar is primarily suggested to be effective in long-term C sequestration in agricultural soils due to its long-term stability. In addition, it could be applied to improve various soil properties, plant growth and to reduce soil GHG emissions. To date, knowledge about such beneficial biochar effects in soil under predicted warming climate is extremely scarce. In the first study, a slow-pyrolysis biochar from Miscanthus x giganteus feedstock (600 °C, 30 Min.) was incubated for short time (37d) under controlled laboratory conditions in agricultural soil in the presence of earthworms and N-rich litter (Phacelia tanacetifolia Benth.). Biochar increased microbial abundances and the fungal-to-bacterial PLFA ratio after 37 days in arable soil applied with litter suggesting improved living conditions for microorganisms with biochar. Fungi may benefit most from newly created habitats due to colonizable biochar pores and surfaces. Additionally, fungi could have also mineralized small amounts of recalcitrant biochar-C during plant litter decomposition. Without litter, biochar led to interactions between earthworms and soil microorganisms resulting in enhanced bacterial and fungal abundances. This indicates better growth habitats for soil microbes in earthworm casts containing biochar. Soil respiration and metabolic quotients (qCO2) and N2O emissions (in litter treatments) were decreased after biochar application suggesting a more efficient microbial community and underscoring the GHG mitigation potential of the used biochar. The field experiment, investigated in the second and third study, focused on the stability and long-term soil C sequestration potential of comparable Miscanthus biochar (850 °C, 30 Min.). Related effects on soil GHG emissions, physical, chemical and microbiological soil properties as well as plant growth were determined in an agroecosystem at year-round elevated soil temperature (+2.5 °C, since 2008). The second study investigated the short-term effects of biochar on microbial abundances and growth of winter rapeseed during the first year after field application to a warmed temperate arable soil. It was found that fungal biomass and the fungal-to-bacterial ratio were increased in the warmed biochar plots only after three months in the presence of spring barley litter from the previous growing season. The disappearance of this effect points to an overall high stability of the investigated biochar. Moreover, biochar proved to be effective in mitigating negative effects of seasonal dryness on microbial abundances and early plant growth in the dry spring period in 2014. However, biochar had no effect on final aboveground biomass of winter rapeseed at harvest in the first growing season. As shown in the third study, after two vegetation periods of winter rapeseed and spring wheat, the assumption that plant productivity in already fertile temperate arable soils is unlikely to be further enhanced with biochar amendment, was confirmed. Total CO2 emissions after two years were not reduced by biochar and remained unchanged even under warming suggesting a high degradation stability of the used biochar. N2O emissions were increased in biochar-amended soil at elevated soil temperature, presumably due to enhanced water and fertilizer retention with biochar. By using the global warming potential (GWP100) of total soil GHG emissions, the storage of biochar-C in soil was estimated to compensate warming-induced elevated soil GHG emissions for 20 years. To conclude, this thesis revealed that biochar may have only minor influence on soil microorganisms and crop growth in temperate, fertile arable field soils. However, it was shown that biochar could be a valuable tool for C sequestration in temperate arable soils, thus potentially offsetting a warming-induced increase in GHG emissions. In order to face climate change impacts, more long-term studies on microbiological effects and the C sequestration potential of biochar in cultivated soil under warming are urgently needed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar mitigated seasonal dryness effects on early plant growth.

Taxon
winter rapeseede1
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
early plant growthe0
Direction
mitigating negative effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biochar proved to be effective in mitigating negative effects of seasonal dryness on microbial abundances and early plant growth in the dry spring period in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2868–3029 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of winter rapeseed during the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2445–2492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar had no effect on final winter rapeseed aboveground biomass.

Taxon
winter rapeseede0
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
final aboveground biomasse0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“biochar had no effect on final aboveground biomass of winter rapeseed at harvest in the first growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3040–3148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar did not enhance productivity after rapeseed and spring wheat rotations.

Taxon
winter rapeseede0
Treatment
biochar amendmente0
Outcome
plant productivitye0
Direction
unlikely to be further enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“after two vegetation periods of winter rapeseed and spring wheat, the assumption that plant productivity in already fertile temperate arable soils is unlikely to be further enhanced with biochar amendment, was confirmed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3179–3398 · show in text ↑

biochar · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

biochar · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

other · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.