Abstract
Clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub] popularly known as “Guar” is an important leguminous crop of kharif season in arid and semi-arid region of the Indian subcontinent. In the present investigation efficacy of thirteen different treatments alone and with combination were tested against bacterial blight of clusterbean [Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. cyamopsidis (XAC)]. Among the treatments, lowest bacterial blight PDI (8.5, 7.5 and 5.83) were observed in treatment T2; (Streptocycline (250 ppm) + Blitox (0.2%) two sprayed at 15 days interval) followed by (11.0, 11.83 and 8.16 PDI) in treatment T11; (Streptocycline 150 ppm + Carbendazim 12% + Mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% two sprayed at 15 days interval). The seed yield, per cent disease reduction and per cent yield increase over control were also highest (1560 kgha-1, 83.27 and 79.51% respectively) in the treatment (T2) followed by in treatment (T11) (1390 kg ha-1, 76.37 and 59.95% respectively) which were the most effective as well as economically and beneficial treatments to manage the bacterial blight of clusterbean under epiphytotic conditions
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
T2 had the lowest bacterial blight PDI.
- Taxon
- clusterbean
Cyamopsis tetragonolobat0 - Treatment
- Streptocycline (250 ppm) + Blitox (0.2%) two sprayed at 15 days intervale0
- Outcome
- bacterial blight PDIe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 8.5, 7.5 and 5.83e0
Not reportedInteractorComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lowest bacterial blight PDI (8.5, 7.5 and 5.83) were observed in treatment T2; (Streptocycline (250 ppm) + Blitox (0.2%) two sprayed at 15 days interval)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 followed T2 for bacterial blight PDI.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
- Treatment
- Streptocycline 150 ppm + Carbendazim 12% + Mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% two sprayed at 15 days intervale0
- Outcome
- PDIe0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 11.0, 11.83 and 8.16e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by (11.0, 11.83 and 8.16 PDI) in treatment T11; (Streptocycline 150 ppm + Carbendazim 12% + Mancozeb 63% @ 0.2% two sprayed at 15 days interval)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 produced the highest seed yield.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
- Treatment
- treatment (T2)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1560 kgha-1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seed yield, per cent disease reduction and per cent yield increase over control were also highest (1560 kgha-1, 83.27 and 79.51% respectively) in the treatment (T2)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 had the highest disease reduction.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
- Treatment
- treatment (T2)e0
- Outcome
- per cent disease reductione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 83.27e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seed yield, per cent disease reduction and per cent yield increase over control were also highest (1560 kgha-1, 83.27 and 79.51% respectively) in the treatment (T2)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 had the highest yield increase over control.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
- Treatment
- treatment (T2)e0
- Outcome
- per cent yield increasee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 79.51%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The seed yield, per cent disease reduction and per cent yield increase over control were also highest (1560 kgha-1, 83.27 and 79.51% respectively) in the treatment (T2)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 produced seed yield of 1390 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
- Treatment
- treatment (T11)e0
- Outcome
- treatment (T11)e0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1390 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by in treatment (T11) (1390 kg ha-1, 76.37 and 59.95% respectively)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 gave 76.37 percent disease reduction.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
- Treatment
- treatment (T11)e0
- Outcome
- treatment (T11)e0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 76.37e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by in treatment (T11) (1390 kg ha-1, 76.37 and 59.95% respectively)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
Claim · model-written summary
T11 gave 59.95% yield increase.
- Taxon
- clusterbeanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
- Treatment
- treatment (T11)e0
- Outcome
- treatment (T11)e0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 59.95%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“followed by in treatment (T11) (1390 kg ha-1, 76.37 and 59.95% respectively)”
t0“bacterial blight of clusterbean”
The same questions in other papers
application · disease · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.