Paper · 2018 · Journal of Economic Entomology

A Comparative Assessment of the Response of Two Species of Cucumber Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to Visual and Olfactory Cues and Prospects for Mass Trapping

Jaime C Piñero

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Spotted (Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardii) and striped (Acalymma vittatum) cucumber beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) are serious pests of field-grown cucurbits in most areas of the United States where these crops are grown. This study aimed at quantifying, using a comparative approach, the behavioral response of A. vittatum and D. u. howardii to visual and olfactory cues associated with different trap types. In a first field study, Pherocon corn rootworm (CRW) traps baited with a 5-component floral-based lure (= AgBio lure) captured significantly more A. vittatum than traps baited with any other commercial lure. When used in combination with yellow sticky cards, the AgBio lure outperformed the other lures except for the Trécé lure TRE8274. Subsequent tests revealed that the response of both cucumber beetle species to the AgBio lure was positively associated with increases in the amount of lure used. In the last series of tests that involved color discrimination by the beetles, traps constructed using 3.8-liter jugs painted yellow outperformed the CRW trap. Results from on-farm research, conducted at a commercial vegetable farm, confirmed the beetles' visual preference for yellow, and also revealed an excellent performance of the mass trapping system, which kept cucumber beetle densities in the cash crop below economic thresholds. Combined findings indicate that the mass trapping system developed can be implemented as part of a broader IPM program aimed at managing cucumber beetles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AgBio-baited traps captured significantly more A. vittatum than traps with other commercial lures.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
AgBio luree0
Interactor
A. vittatumAcalymma vittatume0pest
Outcome
captured significantly more A. vittatume0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
any other commercial luree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acalymma vittatum
Acalymma vittatum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pherocon corn rootworm (CRW) traps baited with a 5-component floral-based lure (= AgBio lure) captured significantly more A. vittatum than traps baited with any other commercial lure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With yellow cards, AgBio outperformed other lures except Trécé TRE8274.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
AgBio luree0
Interactor
cucumber beetle speciese1pest
Outcome
outperformed the other lurese0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
other lures except for the Trécé lure TRE8274e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When used in combination with yellow sticky cards, the AgBio lure outperformed the other lures except for the Trécé lure TRE8274”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“both cucumber beetle species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–831 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both beetle species responded more to larger amounts of AgBio lure.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
AgBio luree0
Interactor
cucumber beetle speciese0pest
Outcome
response of both cucumber beetle speciese0
Direction
positively associatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of both cucumber beetle species to the AgBio lure was positively associated with increases in the amount of lure used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow jug traps outperformed CRW traps.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
traps constructed using 3.8-liter jugs painted yellowe0
Interactor
beetlesColeopterae1pest
Outcome
outperformed the CRW trape0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
CRW trape0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“traps constructed using 3.8-liter jugs painted yellow outperformed the CRW trap”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“color discrimination by the beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–996 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On-farm research confirmed cucumber beetles preferred yellow.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
beetlesColeopterae0pest
Outcome
beetles' visual preference for yellowe0
Setting
commercial vegetable farme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results from on-farm research, conducted at a commercial vegetable farm, confirmed the beetles' visual preference for yellow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mass trapping kept cucumber beetle density in the cash crop below economic thresholds.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
mass trapping systeme0
Interactor
cucumber beetlee0pest
Outcome
cucumber beetle densities in the cash crope0
Direction
belowe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mass trapping system, which kept cucumber beetle densities in the cash crop below economic thresholds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend including the mass trapping system in cucumber beetle IPM.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Interactor
cucumber beetlese0pest
Outcome
implemented as part of a broader IPM program aimed at managing cucumber beetlese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mass trapping system developed can be implemented as part of a broader IPM program aimed at managing cucumber beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber Beetles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–75 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.