Paper · 2018 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Response of growth, yield, and quality of pea shoots to supplemental light-emitting diode lighting during winter greenhouse production

Yun Kong; Dave Llewellyn; Youbin Zheng

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Low natural light levels during the winter months are a major limiting factor for greenhouse production in northern regions. To determine the effects of supplemental lighting (SL) on winter greenhouse production of pea shoots, crop growth, yield, and quality were investigated under the treatments of supplemental photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 50, 80, 110, and 140 μmol m −2 s −1 , all with a 16 h photoperiod, plus a no-SL control treatment, inside a Canadian greenhouse from December to March. Light-emitting diodes with a red to blue PPFD ratio of 4:1 and peak wavelengths at 665 and 440 nm were used for the lighting treatment. During the trial period, the average natural daily light integral (DLI) inside the greenhouse was 5.3 mol m −2 d −1 and the average daily temperature was around 13 °C. Compared with the no-SL control, SL of 50–140 μmol m −2 s −1 increased stem length and leaf number before the first harvest and promoted the cumulative yield (kg m −2 ) of pea shoots throughout the five harvest times. The total yield (kg m −2 ) of five harvests and weekly average stem extension rate were proportional to supplemental PPFD within the range of 0–140 μmol m −2 s −1 ; however, SL of 50–80 μmol m −2 s −1 , corresponding to total (natural + supplemental) DLI of 8.1–9.8 mol m −2 d −1 , resulted in the best integrated quality based on the evaluation of individual fresh mass, soluble solids content, succulence, and firmness. Therefore, a total DLI ranging between 8.1 and 9.8 mol m −2 d −1 can be suggested as a target for winter greenhouse production of pea shoots under conditions similar to this trial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental light increased stem length and leaf number before first harvest.

Taxon
pea shootse0t0
Treatment
SL of 50–140 μmol m −2 s −1e0t0
Outcome
stem length and leaf numbere0t0
Direction
increasede0t0
Comparator
no-SL controle0t0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the no-SL control, SL of 50–140 μmol m −2 s −1 increased stem length and leaf number before the first harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental light promoted cumulative pea shoot yield over five harvests.

Taxon
pea shootse0t0
Treatment
SL of 50–140 μmol m −2 s −1e0t0
Outcome
cumulative yielde0t0
Direction
promotede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SL of 50–140 μmol m −2 s −1 increased stem length and leaf number before the first harvest and promoted the cumulative yield (kg m −2 ) of pea shoots throughout the five harvest times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total five-harvest yield rose proportionally with supplemental PPFD.

Taxon
pea shootse0t0
Treatment
supplemental PPFDe0t0
Outcome
total yielde0t0
Direction
proportionale0t0
Qualifier
0–140 μmol m −2 s −1e0t0

Verbatim

e0

“The total yield (kg m −2 ) of five harvests and weekly average stem extension rate were proportional to supplemental PPFD within the range of 0–140 μmol m −2 s −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly stem extension rate rose proportionally with supplemental PPFD.

Taxon
pea shootse0t0
Treatment
supplemental PPFDe0t0
Outcome
weekly average stem extension ratee0t0
Direction
proportionale0t0
Qualifier
0–140 μmol m −2 s −1e0t0

Verbatim

e0

“The total yield (kg m −2 ) of five harvests and weekly average stem extension rate were proportional to supplemental PPFD within the range of 0–140 μmol m −2 s −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50–80 supplemental PPFD produced the best integrated quality.

Taxon
pea shootse0t0
Treatment
SL of 50–80 μmol m −2 s −1e0t0
Outcome
integrated qualitye0t0
Direction
beste0t0
Value
8.1–9.8 mol m −2 d −1e0t0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SL of 50–80 μmol m −2 s −1 , corresponding to total (natural + supplemental) DLI of 8.1–9.8 mol m −2 d −1 , resulted in the best integrated quality based on the evaluation of individual fresh mass, soluble solids content, succulence, and firmness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested total DLI 8.1–9.8 as a winter pea shoot production target.

Taxon
pea shootse0t0
Outcome
total DLIe0t0
Value
8.1 and 9.8 mol m −2 d −1e0t0
Setting
greenhousee0t0

Verbatim

e0

“a total DLI ranging between 8.1 and 9.8 mol m −2 d −1 can be suggested as a target for winter greenhouse production of pea shoots under conditions similar to this trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–52 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 33 positive, 26 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

light · quality: general · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.