Paper · 2017

Effect of organic manure (cow manure) addition and soil moisture variation on the growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) on BRIS Soil.

Noor Syazwani Smail

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BRIS soil is a problematically abundance sandy soil especially in the coastal area of Peninsular Malaysia. The poor structure, low water retention and insufficient of nutrients content of BRIS soil can be improved through the addition of organic matter. The best and affordable organic matter for soil amendment is cow manure and it has been known as an improving element in agriculture for the sandy soil texture. In this study, three different ratio of soil media and two levels of soil moisture were used to determine the effect on the growth of Arachis hypogaea. The three different ratio of BRIS soil and cow manure were 1:0, 1:1, and 1:3. The two level of soil moisture were 30% and 80%. Number of leaves, plant height, diameter of stem, and relative growth rate were calculated. The result was subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the mean obtained was compared in Tukey’s Test. Throughout the 8 weeks of study, the best treatment that contributes to the most successful plant growth performance was Media 3 (1 BRIS soil: 3 Cow Manure) with interaction of 80% Soil Moisture. Result showed that Media 3 Soil Moisture 80% had the highest significance effect towards the growth of A.hypogaea. For number of leaves, media had the highest significance effect (p=0.000), soil moisture (p=0.017) and interaction of both (p=0.033). For the height of plant, media and soil moisture were significantly higher (p=0.000) and no significance effect for both interaction (p=0.779). For stem diameter, media was highly significant (p=0.000), no significance effect for soil moisture (p=0.517) and interaction of both (p=0.412). These results suggested that crops can be cultivated on BRIS soil after improving the properties of BRIS soil by applying cow manure.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 BRIS soil to cow manure medium with 80% moisture gave the best groundnut growth.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Media 3 (1 BRIS soil: 3 Cow Manure) with interaction of 80% Soil Moisturee0
Outcome
plant growth performancee0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“the best treatment that contributes to the most successful plant growth performance was Media 3 (1 BRIS soil: 3 Cow Manure) with interaction of 80% Soil Moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 manure medium with 80% moisture had a significant effect on groundnut growth.

Taxon
A.hypogaeaArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Media 3 Soil Moisture 80%e0
Outcome
growth of A.hypogaeae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Media 3 Soil Moisture 80% had the highest significance effect towards the growth of A.hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing medium significantly affected leaf number.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
mediae0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
p=0.000e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For number of leaves, media had the highest significance effect (p=0.000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture significantly affected leaf number.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil moisturee0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
p=0.017e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For number of leaves, media had the highest significance effect (p=0.000), soil moisture (p=0.017)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and soil moisture interacted significantly for leaf number.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
interaction of bothe0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
p=0.033e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For number of leaves, media had the highest significance effect (p=0.000), soil moisture (p=0.017) and interaction of both (p=0.033)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing medium significantly affected plant height.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
mediae0
Outcome
height of plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
p=0.000e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the height of plant, media and soil moisture were significantly higher (p=0.000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture significantly affected plant height.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil moisturee0
Outcome
height of plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
p=0.000e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the height of plant, media and soil moisture were significantly higher (p=0.000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and moisture interaction had no significant effect on plant height.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
both interactione0
Outcome
height of plante0
Value
p=0.779e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For the height of plant, media and soil moisture were significantly higher (p=0.000) and no significance effect for both interaction (p=0.779)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing medium significantly affected stem diameter.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
mediae0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Value
p=0.000e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For stem diameter, media was highly significant (p=0.000)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil moisture had no significant effect on stem diameter.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
soil moisturee0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Value
p=0.517e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For stem diameter, media was highly significant (p=0.000), no significance effect for soil moisture (p=0.517)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and moisture interaction had no significant effect on stem diameter.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
interaction of bothe0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Value
p=0.412e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“For stem diameter, media was highly significant (p=0.000), no significance effect for soil moisture (p=0.517) and interaction of both (p=0.412)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1627 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest cow manure amendment to cultivate crops on BRIS soil.

Taxon
Arachis hypogaeaArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
applying cow manuree0
Outcome
crops can be cultivated on BRIS soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Arachis hypogaea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“crops can be cultivated on BRIS soil after improving the properties of BRIS soil by applying cow manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1761 · show in text ↑

soil water · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

in vitro · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 41 positive, 3 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.